ForArgyll.com: Argyll's online broadsheet.

My firm, evidence backed, viewpoint is: 1. The Earth’s …

Comment posted Question: How can we license fracking when we have permanent drought? by W.S..

My firm, evidence backed, viewpoint is:
1. The Earth’s climate fluctuates cyclically, always has done, always will. Sometimes it warms, sometimes it cools.
2. These climate cycles are perfectly natural.
3. The overwhelming driver of climate on the Earth is the energy we receive from the sun.
4. There is nothing we can do against the power of the sun.
5. CO2 is a red herring, it has had no discernable influence on temperature for two decades now, and the theory of mmgw is promulgated for political purposes.
If you’re worried about natural warming cycles then we should do what we have always done, extremely successfuly…adapt.

W.S. also commented

  • Well said Morag.

    The only problem, though, is your basic premise that people are denying Climate Change.

    Wrong.

    No-one is denying Climate Change.

    What Free-Thinkers and Open-Minded folk are doing is strongly questioning the evidently spurious link between CO2 emmisions and our, naturally, ever changing climate.

    Fortunately we have not all been brainwashed like the bullying haters of free speech; The global warming alarmists.

  • Free-Thinkers have, no doubt, spotted that neither Webcraft nor Tim McIntyre have been capable of addressing the issue raised in the articles I linked to…..that temperature data has been clearly and proveably manipulated in order to make the Alarmist case !

    Their only defense is to try to rubbish the source of the articles.

    Clearly the global warming industry alarmists cannot defend the science so take to attacking personalities and organisations instead.

    Most clearly, therefore, the jury is still out.

  • Those who have open minds and are reading this rather contentious thread with deep sighs may want to read these two short articles.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/04/11/a-new-global-warming-alarmist-tactic-real-temperature-measurements-dont-matter/

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/04/18/more-global-warming-alarmist-games-doctoring-the-temperature-record/

    They help one understand why the global warming industry and, in particular, the Alarmists are getting all hot and bothered right now, like the Emperor when told about his clothes.

  • 1.
    By how much have global average temperatures and CO2 concentrations risen since 1982?
    http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/uah_march2011.png
    Ans: No temp rise, huge CO2 rise.
    2.
    You’re a cheeky wee fellow aren’t you……demanding to know what my “scientific credentials are, specifically in physics and atmospheric science”.
    I’ll show you mine if you’ll show me yours!
    What you do have, scientifically ? Google is your friend….a website salesman ! That you?
    Nothing wrong there, but hardly makes you a climate expert.
    But hang on, the google brings up the rather interesting fact that your username appears to run at least five, little visited, global warming websites. Is this you? http://www.greenphase.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1472&sid=66afaa7a6e1284289f88e1d4ad0bf618 ?
    Answer those above and I’ll answer your equally personal question about my scientific qualifications.
    Meanwhile the jury is still out.
  • Yes, very deep sigh.

    Ad nauseum is correct, but sit and think for a moment…….who is it, every time, who always first brings global warming into virtually every topic here?

    Hint…take a look at post 4 and the extremely condescending put down of SchoolDefender’s reasonable question.

    Sigh indeed.

    As for the graph I posted……thirty years of data and where’s the catastrophic global warming, where’s the hockey stick ?
    Were there no CO2 emmisions in that period ?
    The temperature trend is near as dammit flat !!!!!

    Someone screamed IPCC; Well they’ve been making Alarmist predictions for decades now…..name just one which has turned out to have happened as predicted.

    Global warming alarmists need to pull their ostrich-like heads out of the sand and listen.

Recent comments by W.S.

  • Scotland’s Future: from the Referendum to Independence and a Written Constitution
    If the current polls are to be believed then all we need is for everyone who already knows they will be voting NO to persuade one other person over the next 18 months and there will be a totally overwhelmimg majority for remaining British.

    I wonder when the NO vote comes if the cybernats will move to Iceland or Norway ?

    Or another North European country all of which are so different from us culturally, historically, financialy and with totally different mindsets to us Scots ?

  • Scotland’s Future: from the Referendum to Independence and a Written Constitution
    You’ll find that its the poster not the post getting the thumbs down.

    Check everything that you and your aliases post; immediate multiple thumbs downs. People here are fed up with trolls like you.

  • Scotland’s Future: from the Referendum to Independence and a Written Constitution
    Okay, I followed your suggestion and very quickly spotted that Webcraft goes by the name of NickB***** and operates ScotsRenewables.

    Your BicNee username then connects logically.

    Since you suggested it a further google search brings up all your other usernames clearly connected to you eg Crimson Vicar comes up as the moderator of a small community website run by Webcraft.

    Sure Newsroom knows who you are. I guess everyone does now thanks to your suggestion to google Webcraft.

    However the point is that you have clearly breached Terms and Conditions by posting here using multiple different usernames.

    Why do you do this?

  • Scotland’s Future: from the Referendum to Independence and a Written Constitution
    >>> “so I think I’ll stick to the grown ups web sites where serious debate on serious issues in conducted.” <<<

    Almost exactly the words ScotsRenewables used when he pretended to flounce off after a couple of long rants about perceived anti-Independence/SNP bias on here.

    FofS then (re)appeared on here a week or so later and carried on in exactly the same way as SR.

    ….and of course its easy to prove the connection further between SR, Webcraft, NickB, BicNee, and Crimson Vicar by just doing a google search for one of the first two.

  • Scotland’s Future: from the Referendum to Independence and a Written Constitution
    Troll says >>>”WS: Get a life. I don’t think I have never even met Webcraft – though from his previous posts I know who he is.” <<<

    You've never met yourself !!!

    You've been outed by others, not just me, as posting on here using multiple user names just as you used to on the Oban Times forum.

    What do we have? a right trollicking collection:
    Feltcher of Soltoun
    Webcraft
    Scots Renewables
    NickB
    Crimson Vicar
    BicNee
    …..and others.

    The giveaway is the shared obsessions and shared insulting posting style of all above. Shared; I mean exactly the same.

    Many of us have sussed you. Newsroom probably tolerates you for the amusement factor, but not for much longer I reckon if you keep insulting her under whatever username you happen to be trolling with..

powered by SEO Super Comments