It looks as if the Oban Times has …

Comment posted 2012 Scottish Islands Peaks Race Oban to Troon – just finished by Norman Martin.

It looks as if the Oban Times has applied the telescope to the blind eye because I see no report of this major event whatsover in today’s issue.
Well done For Argyll for your excellent coverage.

Norman Martin also commented

  • Why can’t this event be given more advance publicity to promote public interest? The start from Oban is always worth watching, even without the Pharos!

Recent comments by Norman Martin

  • Mull’s Inverlussa Marine secures 7 year contract in the Northern Isles
    Congratulations to Ben and his dad on a fine vessel and company, and a very nice tribute to his granny by naming the ship in her honour.
  • Conundrum in Yeoman Bank’s anchoring off Machrihanish
    Newsie, your last para has it correct re the blythe assumption that the market can provide resources timeously to protect the coast of Scotland. Thanks to Riverworker for info.
  • Conundrum in Yeoman Bank’s anchoring off Machrihanish
    No commercial tug available for two weeks? See link re Emergency Towing Vessel cover and Maritime Incident Response Group. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmtran/1018/101805.htm
  • SNP Government to cede control of Scotland’s coasts to a call centre in Hampshire
    No doubt you think Holyrood are also to blame for the loss of Nimrod SAR cover, the closure of the Maritime Incident Response Group (MIRG) to assist ships on fire around UK coasts and the threat to remove the ETVs or Emergency Towing Vessels (ie tugs) all implemented by this UK government but strangely absent from their manifesto, whether Tory or LibDem. Each of these issues constitutes a real degregation of safety at sea. As the Shipping Minister represents Wimbledon perhaps we shouldn’t be holding our breath waiting for him to rectify these matters.
  • Russell describes three year delay in west coast ferries contract as ‘a breathing space’
    Ouch! Is there a wee raw nerve there? We might have hoped for a gracious admission of having jumped to a false conclusion on unbundling. The council run services may appear peripheral from the newsroom but they are of considerable interest to the communities involved. The draft ferries document does not actually propose cutting services, some are identified for further study, surely the opportunity for users to make their case now if they consider them essential. (I think they are). Isn’t that what the whole review process means? On 21st Sept you reported the minister as saying ‘As I said in my statement of 5 September to the Chamber, on the subject of Ferries to Orkney, our next challenge is the replacement of the contract for the Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services which expires in October next year.

    ‘Despite recent speculation, no final decisions have been made regarding the Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Service (CHFS) tender. We are currently considering our approach to fulfilling the tendering requirements to ensure we can deliver a ferry service that matches our aspirations.

    ‘We will be announcing our plans for the procurement of the next contract soon and we can assure local communities, ferry users and the service providers that, as well as Parliament, they will be among the first to be informed of our final decision.

    ‘By the end of this, we will fulfil our promise to publish the Final Ferries Plan and this provide a blueprint for improvements to ferry services across the country. This plan will set down the foundation for a programme of investments that clearly demonstrates our commitment to our island communities and to the ferries serving them.’ This is entirely consistent with this week’s announcement, so I don’t understand what you are asking me to account for.

powered by SEO Super Comments

26 Responses to It looks as if the Oban Times has …

  1. The Helicopter would be landing at the Northern Lighthouse Board depot, not far from Manor House. It looks like their helicopter.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Excellent reporting – but I’m mystified at the behaviour of the skipper of the Pharos; a couple of years ago I returned to Plymouth on the Brittany Ferries flaghip – the Pont Aven, 41,000 tons. It was a sunday afternoon and Plymouth Sound was infested with small boats racing. Pont Aven crawled around and through them, taking great care – and no tooting at anyone. I’d like to hear Pharos’s side of the story – surely it doesn’t need a pilot in Oban waters, or maybe a French skipper?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. I echo Robert’s view. Pharos’s performance is in stark contrast to that of the Cal Mac outer isles ferry which meets the race fleet every year just outside Dunollie and invariably keeps well clear and shows patience and the short few minutes of forebearance required. And unlike Pharos, the ferry doesn’t have dynamic positioning systems that can balance it on a penny.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. We on yacht Capricorn (Team SPIE) were the yacht right under Pharos bow when the skipper came out onto the gantry and asked us to make room in a less than polite manner including gestures.

    In strict accordance with the COLREGS he was undoubtably correct in that he was manouevering in restricted waters and so had right of way – but was his need so great to leave whilst the fleet were negotiating the tight exit to Oban Bay whilst adrenalined up to the eyeballs?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • This is the core issue, isn’t it? Why then? Pharos does not have the sort of deadlines the CalMac ferries have to deal with. The decision to sail just then seems unhelpfully blinkered – , when earlier or 15 minutes later would have been respectful of a once-a-year unique, spectacular and highly competitive event.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Pharos was waiting in the bay all morning; we sailed quite close to her while jockeying for the start. Why she decided to leave when it was clear that there was going to be significant traffic in the narrows seems to require explanation. While she could argue she was stand on vessel, this give her no rights if the other boats also are restricted in their ability to manoeuvre, which was the case with these sailing vessels in light or no wind in a restricted channel. I think team SPIE/Capricorn have reason to be less charitable. Pharos is funded from public money.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • Pharos may claim simply colreg Rule 9, the right “not to be impeded” by sailing vessels under 20 metres length in a narrow channel.

          At nautical college, my lecturer, former NLB master of the old 1950s built Pharos as it happens, emphasised that the over-riding essence of the colregs is that you must take every action possible to avoid collision, and with all due regard for the circumstances.

          I think Rules 7 and 8 may have some relevance. Rule 7, Risk of Collision: was there a risk of collison? Most certainly, yes, many times over. Why? Because when Pharos left her berth, the channel, and indeed much of the rest of the bay, was congested, full of slow, close-hauled and tacking sailing vessels. And let’s not forget that from the perspective of the yacht skippers, there would be colregs obligations to contend with between the 50 sailing boats too.

          Rule 8, Action to Avoid Collision, “8(e) If necessary to avoid collision or allow more time to assess the situation, a vessel may slacken her speed or take all way off by stopping or reversing her means of propulsion.” (Or even remain at your berth for a few minutes longer?) Obligations on a right of way vessel “8(f) (iii) A vessel the passage of which is not to be impeded remains fully obliged to comply with the rules of this part when the two vessels are approaching one another so as to involve risk of collision.” The essence of Rule 8 is, don’t get into a close quarters situation, regardless of who is right, and if you do, then avoiding collision takes over from the right not to be impeded.
          Rule 13, Overtaking “13)a) … any vessel overtaking any other shall keep out of the way of the vessel being overtaken.” Difficult when that’s vessels x 50 to be overtaken in a narrow channel and all are constrained by draught, even assuming they’re trying not to impede you.

          Finally, Rule 34, sound signals, “34(d) When … either vessel fails to understand the intentions or actions of the other, or is in doubt whether sufficient action is being taken by the other to avoid collision, the vessel in doubt shall immediately indicate such doubt by giving at least five short and rapid blasts on the whistle.” Since it seem as though there was a lot of failure to understand intentions or actions, perhaps the sailing vessels should have given 5 blasts when Pharos was leaving the NLB pier.

          Edit – to cut through any irony in the above, I believe Pharos should not have gotten under way if it was obvious what she was heading out into. And given the view avaialble to her from the lighthouse pier, I’d be surprised if it wasn’t crystal clear.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • Thanks for that explanation. I agree that she has a right “not to be impeded” but the essence of this is that Pharos put herself in the position of claiming this right at a point in time where the yachts were already committed to the passage, and because of the light winds, unable to give way to this requirement. As a result I think Pharos at least risked breaching the rule 8 that you describe.

            Still, as discussed at the briefing, and regardless of the rules of the sea, the race rules expressly allow the use of engines in such situations, and perhaps this might have avoided a close quarters situation.

            I think both parties, and indeed all the race participants should reflect on this and learn lessons. Describing us as WAFIs in tupperware boats really risks polarising the discussion over what is a complex issue. I have had several episodes where professional seamen have not acted with credit to their profession. It does not make me want to insult the professionalism of the others by using disparaging language.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • NLB is funded from light dues gathered from shipping using our waters, and doesn’t cost the tax payer one penny. Sorry to burst your bubble. WAFIS on the other hand, use all the facilities without charge…you’re welcome.
          The wider issue is whether the opinion of leisure sailors in Tupperware boats “adrenalined up to the eyeballs” is of any value arguing about “steam” gives way to sail in a commercial shipping lane, getting in the way of marine professionals.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • The only alternative to the Pharos being mildly inconvenienced was for all the competitors to disqualify themselves by starting their engines. Are you seriously suggesting this is what should have happened?

            I wasn’t there, but it sounds to me as though the skipper of the Pharos was unnecessarily and pointlessly aggressive no matter what the technical situation under the IRPCS. Hardly the behaviour one would expect of a ‘marine professional’.

            Fortunately relations between yachties and ‘marine professionals’ – whether fishermen, CalMac, tourist boats or dive boat skippers – are generally excellent in our local waters, and this incident is very much a one-off.

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • yes she was on a cruise of the Clyde, saw her on monday afternoon off the cumbraes and again off Jura on tuesday afternoon her speed was very slow about 6 knts , why didn,t he leave by the south channel!!!
        Or perhaps he should have gone to SPECSAVERS !!!
        His BULLY BOY i,m bigger than you attitude stinks

        Calmac however were brilliant as ever , altering course to keep out of eveyones way

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Why can’t this event be given more advance publicity to promote public interest? The start from Oban is always worth watching, even without the Pharos!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Pingback: Impala 28 Offshore One Design » Impala wins Class 3 of Scottish Islands Peaks Race

  7. I was racing on my fathers yacht during SIPR 12, and I am disgusted at the complete arrogance of the Pharos Captain, from our view it looked as if he was deliberately trying to cause chaos. Why could the Pharos have not waited for 30 mins or leave the bay via the sound of Kerrera?

    I am looking forward to the video of the whole incidence going up on youtube for the whole world to see and make their own opinion! My personal opinion is that the captain of the Pharos, should explain his actions to not only the SIPR team but also to the NLB commissioners & why he should allowed to keep his job!!!

    It was utterly disgusting behaviour from the Pharos who should have waited or left 30 mins earlier! Something needs to be done about this before someone seriously gets hurt or killed!! The captain is a complete nutter!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Who is “Jack Aubrey”? Could there be such a coincidence that our “marine professionals” cheerleader actually has the same monicker as that murderous, belligerent, Napoleonic War nutter played by Russell Crowe? Maybe he has Aubrey-like anger issues. Or is he just a wannabe hard man? In fact, I’m beginning to see some very disturbing connections here … I surely hope he’s never given charge of so much as a kayak, far less a ship.

    Use your real name, man, and have a proper reasoned discussion if you’re capable of it. Dismantle my interpretation of the International Rules for the Prevention of Collision at Sea if you can, and BTW, your opinion might carry some weight if you wouldn’t hide behind a rather pathetic pseudonym. What happened last week was real world, not fantasy.

    Nothing in the collision regs says that commercial shipping has any rights over anyone else. If you can’t accept that then I hope you never take charge of anything that floats because you’ll plainly be a menace.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Touchy?!!
      Calm down dear, let’s keep it real. I suggest looking up “brevity” in your dictionary and apply it to your posts, which are in danger of becoming longer than the original articles.
      Lots of people had a great day despite these windy colreg explanations. As Homer would say, “blah, blah, blah”!
      Well done Forargyll and all involved, what a spectacle.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. It looks as if the Oban Times has applied the telescope to the blind eye because I see no report of this major event whatsover in today’s issue.
    Well done For Argyll for your excellent coverage.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. I was an RYA Offshore Instructor for 20 years on the West Coast. All trainees had to obey the Collision Regs. to the letter, as they had been taught during their shore based theory training – but always with the rider – never take your eyes off the other vessel- he probably knows less than you do!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Whatever the correct interpretation of the Collision Regs , it seems that at least Pharos’s master is guilty of a gross lack of manners. If she absolutely required to sail when she did , were the race organisers informed ?Did she make a general announcement on VHF , as Calmac do , that she was about to depart.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.