Family left furious after Calmac ferry leaves island without seriously ill patient – but with family on board

The family of a sick 78-year-old woman were left stunned on Saturday Continue reading

To read the rest of this article click here. Originally published by Bute Bites.

EC approves Scotland’s ferry subsidies

Following an official enquiry the European Commission has ruled Continue reading

The Ileach breaks big story on new Islay ferry incompatability with existing ports

Funnel of Juno CalMacThe Ileach, Islay’s cracking newspaper whose jourmalism is after our own heart, broke a major story in its last issue. (The latest is due out at the end of this week.)

The paper has been systematically pursuing a serious omission in strategic forethought in CMAL’s commissioning of its new, larger, £21 million Islay ferry – like whether it can actually dock at and use existing facilities at the ports for the route.

The Ileach was well informed that there was a problem and raised the issue with CMAL, The company’s first response was to say that it, at Port Ellen and Kennacraig, it proposed ‘to instigate a modernisation programme to precede the delivery of the new ferry in 2011′ -  with the comforting qualification: ‘Whilst the existing infrastructure on Islay and the mainland will accommodate the new ferry’.

The Ileach then enquired whether the developments at the mainland port of Kenacraig and the Islay port of Port Ellen would be simultaneous or consecutive. A good question – there would be little value in having port facilities enabling, say, a ferry to depart from the mainland but unable to get into Port Ellen.

CMAL’s reply was that: ‘the new vessel will be able to use the existing ports as they are at present, however this is not ideal and some minor modifications are being developed’.

The Ileach’s research continued and on 23rd February they told CMAL: ‘We are being told that significant work will have to take place to modify the new linkspan at Port Askaig (Editor’s Note: this linkspan has been installed quite recently as  part of a major re-engineering of the harbour facilities at Port Askaig, a contract which has been attended by long term and serious difficulties for the operation of the small car ferry over to Jura) and that this work has been costed at approx £500,000′.

The newspaper said that it understood that: ‘works costing a similar amount will need to be carried out at Kennacraig … and that (the ferry) will not be able to operate from the present Port Ellen infrastructure at all – and that serious redevelopment costing at least £10 million will be required’.

The profound concern for Islay is that, as The Ileach went on to stress to CMAL, if its information is correct: ‘this would mean the de facto closure of  of Port Ellen as a ferry port when the new Islay ferry commences operations?  Certainly for years, if not for good?’

The company’s reply, following a long paragraph of the sort of self-justifying ‘corporate speak’ that degrades language, was: ‘With the design of the new Islay vessel now finalised and construction underway, detailed design work is currently ongoing in respect of the associated pier and harbour infrastructure.  The new vessel will be able to be berthed safely and securely at the recently completed Port Askaig facility.  The new vessel can also be accommodated at the existing Kennacraig facility.  At Port Ellen, detailed examination has revealed that passengers and vehicles could not be accommodated in its current form.

‘CMAL will continue to work very hard to consider how best to develop improvement works at Port Ellen and Kennacraig.’

CMAL say it is holding public meetings at Port Ellen and at Tarbert on the mainland on 10th and 11th March: ‘where we hope to feedback from the public consultation and detail our preferred construction timetable subject to funding’. Whatever that means.

The Ileach’s persistent enquiries have clearly forced into the open a serious problem for the development of ferry transort to and from Islay. This is local journalism at its very best. You can subscribe to The Ileach online and, wherever you are in the world, you will be emailed a link to download a pdf file of the latest issue.

Weekend’s bad weather sees 30 Brandanes left on the mainland for the night

The night – last Friday (19th December) – that saw the Oban Lifeboat called to Mull on the rescue trip For Argyll reported at the time, also saw Argyll’s inshore island of Bute spend a night without thirty normally resident islanders.

in bad weather, Caledonian MacBrayne (CalMac) had to divert the two ferries running from Wemys Bay on the mainland to Rothesay to use Gourock as their mainland port for the time being. Terminal staff and the CalMac website informed potential passengers that the last ferry to Rothesay would leave Gourock at 7.00pm. The company organised a bus to drive the thirty would be passengers from Wemys Bay to Gourock.

As these things happen, the incoming ferry from Rothesay, docked at Gourock and waiting for the bus from Wemys Bay to deliver its returning passengers, had to move out of the berth to let the Jupiter – which had been unable to get away all afternoon – sail for Dunoon during a lull.

When the Bute then tried to get back into the berth she was unable to do so because of the conditions. It was decided that it was dangerous for her to try so she was ordered back to Rothesay without re-docking.

As bad luck would have it, the busload of Brandanes were just leaving Wemys Bay as the Bute turned back from Gourock for Rothesay. The passengers were furious, arguing that CalMac’s organisational communications weren’t exactly joined up.

hile admitting that hindsight offers options that didn’t seem available in the moment,  points out that: ‘At all times we put the safety of our passengers and crew first, and will do whatever we can to minimise disruption, but in severe weather conditions, such as those experienced on Friday, our options are very limited’.

Plans go ahead to develop Oban as a major transport hub – but where’s the air link?

Argyll and Bute Council wants to see its west coast port of Oban become an integrated transport hub. To achieve this, the Council plans to work with a number of key transport providers – such as Caledonian MacBrayne, Scottish Citylink and HITRANS. The group has together now commissioned an engineering appraisal, which will include consultation with key stakeholders. It will commence in January and its findings will be available in April 2009.

The study is designed to evaluate options to:

  • improve the pedestrian routes between bus, train and ferry services
  • improve parking / ferry mustering area / park and ride
  • develop combined rail, ferry, bus passenger terminal facilities
  • develop a link road through the ferry terminal to provide drop off zones for buses, taxis etc.

Councillor Duncan MacIntyre, Transportation spokesperson for the Council, says: ‘Oban, with its existing rail, road, ferry and bus connections, is an important gateway to much of the West Highlands and Islands. This study is vital to ensuring that all modes of transport are integrated to provide an improved transport experience for our residents, visitors and businesses’.

This is commendable strategic forward planning but it is doomed to inadequacy without the inclusion of Oban’s new airport. This has been the single biggest transport development in Argyll for many years. The omission of air transport from the planned development mix illustrates the extent to which the economic development possibilities of this major new facility are still below the Council’s radar.

Yes, Oban has long been the gateway to the isles but many of these isles can now be reached by a choice of transport means. This is an area ripe for development in support of tourism. Links from Oban’s airport to Oban’s ferry and bus networks and to its hotels will need to be integrated within the new plan. New air routes and schedules, even restricted to the summer season, need to be considered, along with the infrastructural services this would necessitate.

Councillor Currie has already raised the possibility of an air bridge service from Colonsay to Islay, now that the smaller island has a runway servicing its links to Oban. This is a far-seeing proposal.

One important argument is that such a service would sharply cut transport time for Colonsay islanders to Glasgow as Islay has an onward link to that city.

A further consideration is that Colonsay is part of the same island group as Islay, yet there is no public transport service between them. Culturally, the addition of an air link from Colonsay to Islay has the capacity to link all three islands in the chain. Jura, the third, has a very short ferry journey to Islay, with access to its airport.

Regardless of what recommendations emerge from the appraisal exercise, For Argyll suggests the immediate inclusion of the airport in the planning mix.

UPDATE (18th December): For Argyll put this matter to Stewart Turner, Head of Roads and Amenity Services at Argyll & Bute Council, who says: ‘The article (the Council’s Press Release) relates to Oban specifically rather than all parts of Lorn which would include the airport.  I am certain that once the work is on-going it will include the Airport’.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Calmac closes bookings for Ullapool to Stornoway sailings until Tuesday

Anyone from Argyll planning to go up to the Western Isles via the ferry from Ullapool between now and Tuesday – and who has not already booked – should contact Calmac on 0800 665000 to identify a suitable alternative date. The company announced this afternoon that it has had to close further bookings for sailings between Ullapool and Stornoway until Tuesday 5th August because of a technical fault.

Our original news item on this had stated that the sailings themselves had been cancelled, rather than the withdrawal of further booking. We are grateful to ‘sandymor’ for posting a comment giving us the correction which guided the revised piece above. His information is that the technical problem relates to the mezzanine lift mechanism.

Colonsay islanders stage angry shipboard protest

Caledonian MacBrayne has backed down in the face of a resolute rebellion by islanders from Colonsay. In the recent bad weather, two in succession of the island’s three weekly sailings were unable to make the crossing. This left residents without fresh food. Those boarding the first ferry to arrive after the storms were told that CalMac was prioritising passengers from the larger and inshore island of Mull. They were allowed to board but were then informed that they would be required to disembark at Mull in favour of people waiting there. They would need to find themselves accommodation in Mull for that night, at their own uncompensated expense, before boarding a ferry for the mainland town of Oban the following day. The islanders refused to leave the ferry. Shirley Johnstone, described as the leader of the rebel group, said: “Mull has six daily sailings whereas this was our only service and the first in a week… I demanded to speak to the Captain and told him none of us were getting off the ship at Mull. I told him this was Colonsay’s crossing and we would have to be physically removed”. Company HQ instructed the captain to take the group the whole way to Oban.  The footnote is that when the ferry arrived at Mull there were still spaces left after picking up those waiting on the quayside.