Smoke and mirrors in Pre-Budget Report disguises a borrowing nightmare – and rise in fuel duty a bad hit on the Highlands

Amongst the heavy use of smoke and mirrors in the Pre-Budget Report, there are three headline stories.

  • The Chancellor has made the biggest ever cut to growth forecasts – dropping from his forecast of 2.75% to 0.5% for this year, then down to minus 0.75% – minus 1.25% in the first two quarters of 2009
  • The borrowing the UK is now committed to is terrifying – £1 Trillion by 2013 -2014 and the strategies for its repayment have not yet been spelled out
  • The growth forecasts on which the Chancellor has based the limit of our borrowing needs are widely considered to be very optimistic – back in surplus at 0.5% at the end of 2009 and from 1.5% to 2% in 2010.

By 2013 – 2014 we will be borrowing £1 Trillion – 57% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the highest in history, worse even than the 1970s when the UK suffered the humiliation of having to go to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to be bailed out. The current limit on the national debt is that it should not exceed 40% of GDP

How this will be repaid is both unclear and uncertain. With the exception of the higher rate of income tax at 45% for incomes over £150,000 – which is more gesture politics than an earner – only two measures were proposed:

  • £5bn of Government department efficiency savings in 2011. Efficiency savings historically are rarely actually made and are very hard to demonstrate convincingly.
  • £5bn from a 0.5% rise in National Insurance contributions from both employees and employers from April 2011. The rise in NICs, which will hit workers and employers, is the only real contribution to the repayment of borrowing.

Before this afternoon’s mini-budget, For Argyll said: ‘Expect generosity more apparent than real’. We could not have been more right. It was sleight of hand all the way.

  • £20 billion injected into the economy between now and 2010 – and £40 billion taken back in raised taxes.
  • A temporary (to end 2009) 2.5% reduction in VAT to 15% – to be offset by a permanent rise in fuel duty. This will hit the Highlands particularly hard – there is usually no alternative to the car; and freight costs for businesses will rise
  • Small businesses have not been given a reduction in corporation tax, but the planned 1p rise in this tax will be deferred. Instead of a reduction in corporation tax, SMEs will be given latitude to spread the payments of all their taxes – VAT, Corporation Tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs) – over an extended period. They will, of course, be incurring more tax debt while they spread repayments of current tax debt. They will also have 0.5% increases in employers’ NIC’s from 2011.
  • Pensioners will get a one-off payment of £60 for an individual and £120 for a couple added to their £10 Christmas Bonus – from January 2009. This means not this year.
  • Basic rate taxpayers will see compensation for the removal of the 10p tax band continue with a reduction of about £145 in their annual tax bill. But all workers (and employers) will pay an additional 0.5% in National Insurance Contributions NICs) from 2011.
  • From 2011, those earning over £150,000pa will pay a new higher rate of tax of 45% on earnings over that limit. The Chancellor said that this will apply to 1% of incomes. It will see someone earning £250,000 pay an additional £5,000 a year. At the same time, the spending power and habits of the rich are likely to gain from the 2.5% cut in VAT for the next 13 months.
  • Motorists will simply see a slower phasing in of the differential vehicle excise duty which will reward low emission vehicles. 2009 will see a flat rate £5 rise for all vehicles. 2009 will see heavy polluting vehicles pay a maximum rise of £30; and lower polluting vehicles pay the same or less.

Before this afternoon, For Argyll said: ‘Expect a June 2009 election’ It looks like we were right on this too. The VAT cuts will last until the end of 2009. Neither the rise in NICs for employees and employers nor the higher rate income tax for the top 1% will hit until Spring 2011, giving a bit of leeway in case the election runs to the wire in 2010. The heaviest Government borrowing will not take place until after 2009.

  • This year, 2008, we will borrow £78 million.
  • In 2009 it will rise to £118 million or 48% of the UKs Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
  • But by 2013 – 2014 the national debt will have risen to 57& of GDP – and it may well be worse since, as noted above, this projected borrowing need is based on growth forecasts higher than anyone expects. The current limit to the national debt is is 40% of GDP.

So in the best possible circumstances and in the fastest possible time, it will be 2015 – seven years from now – before we are in a position to start paying anything back. This is the burden each of us now carries. We have indeed mortgaged our children’s futures.

The £20 billion of giveaways from now until April 2010 includes – and this is not an exhaustive list:

  • £4 bn from the European Investment Bank for our banks (and there are seven in the queue already) to pass on to small businesses.
  • £2bn in loan guarantees for small businesses
  • £1bn in support for working capital of small exporters
  • Businesses going into loss will be able to offset losses to a maximum of £50,000 against three years of profits
  • £3bn of spending brought forward for motorways, housing, schools and energy efficiency
  • Introduction of a Savings Gateway for low income savers – but, everyone missed this, not until 2010. The Government will add 50p for every £1 saved in Savings Gateway accounts. These will be available in banks, building societies, credit unions and – a genuinely good one – Post Offices.
  • Child benefit support – with both currently proposed rises to be paid together from April 2009, adding around £2,035 for middle income families
  • A rise in the Basic State Pension to £95.25
  • A rise in Pension Credits to £130 for an individual and to £198 for a couple
  • A payment of £70 to disabled children
  • £15mn for a free Debt Advice service for all
  • £775mn for social housing
  • £535mn brought forward to pay for 200 more trains and increase environmental protection and flood defences
  • £100mn of new money and £50mn brought forward to pay for insulation in another 60,000 houses in low income families

Warning to Savers – Avoid Isle of Man and Channel Island Banks. These offer attractive rates but because of their individual constitutional relationship to the UK, they contribute nothing to Exchequer. The Chancellor has called for a review of the position of these banks in relation to deposit guarantees. He made it clear that the UK is not going to be ‘universal guarantor’ and does not intend to guarantee accounts in these banks.

A final and sobering note on the situation we’re in is that the cost of insuring against the Government defaulting on Bonds it sells on the stock market has risen sharply in the last few days. It is now second only to Italy – a chilling measure of how our economic stability is viewed by the outside world and by the financial markets. Having said that, the FTSE rose quickly by 10% after the Pre-Budget Review – a sign of confidence by the financial markets, for the moment.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New top tax rate to be introduced to help pay for VAT cuts – but not yet

Another political trick, designed more to stifle the opposition than achieve anything significant, is the leaked plan to introduce a new higher rate of tax – but not now. It will be in the Labour Party Manifesto for the next General Election which may run to 2010 but is now rumoured for a possible June 2009 date.

Should Labour win that election, a new tax rate of 45% will be applied to those earning over £150,000 per annum. This is 2% of the workforce, estimated by the Institute of Fiscal Studies as affecting 400,000 people.

In the meantime informed rumour – meaning strategic leaking – indicates that VAT will be cut by around 2.5% to stimulate spending.

The higher rate tax band is not going to frighten the horses. It’s little more than gesture politics. 5% is a very small rise which will not significantly hit the deep pocket. Someone on £250,000 a year will pay only an additional £5,000 in tax. Also – given the spending power and habits of the very rich, they will save at least as much from the predicted 2.5% VAT cut than they will lose in paying a little more tax.

Tomorrow (Monday 24th November) all will be revealed when, as one political commentator put it, Gordon Brown allows Alistair Darling to read out the pre-budget statement he himself has formulated.

Expect generosity that will be more apparent than real. Expect a June election. Expect that, whoever wins that election, the truth about our financial situation and the long-term burden on all of us will then become painfully clear.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Burt and Mathewson walk away from HBOS – Updated 21st November

Following the statement made by Chancellor Alistair Darling before the Lloyds TSB shareholders voted yesterday to accept the planned takeover of HBOS, Sir Peter Burt and Sir George Mathewson have abandoned their attempt to manage HBOS into independence.

Mr Darling, in a departure from earlier reassurances, announced yesterday – ahead of the Lloyds vote, that if a bank came back to the negotiating table after agreements made at the bail-out, they could not count on receiving the same recapitalisation or share price as previously agreed.

This will certainly, as intended, have stiffened the resolve of the big institutional shareholders to back the Government arranged takeover. This block swung the acceptance vote to a massive 96%.

With many of the institutional shareholders in Lloyds also shareholders in HBOS, the two senior Scottish financiers obviously now anticipate the same outcome at the HBOS shareholder vote in December.

They have shut down the website they had so recently launched, aimed at recruiting HBOS shareholder support for an EGM to consider their proposals. The site currently simply says:

‘In the light of the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s statement on 18th November 2008, we will be making a statement shortly.

‘To those people who have sent in their requisition forms, we thank you for your support’.

For Argyll would anticipate a statement in time for the main news either at 6.00pm or certainly for the 10.00pm.

This effectively means that The Fat Lady has finally sung. The one certain outcome is that the last hope of saving management functions in Scotland and saving branches and jobs across the country, including in Argyll.

For Argyll will update this news item with the financiers’ statement when it comes.

UPDATE Friday 21st November: The statement from Sir Peter Burt and Sir George Mathewson has just been released to lunchtime news services. The Independent HBOS website – which unfortunately was slow to arrive, poorly designed and poorly managed from the outset – still carries the familiar screen promising a statement.

The men say simply that that they have ‘reluctantly decided to discontinue their campaign. They say that they took the decision after the government made it ‘crystal clear”‘ it did not want HBOS to stay independent.

They are also critical of the ‘apparent apathy’ of the current HBOS Board, which led the bank to its collapse. They ask: ‘Why hadn’t the board firmly established… both the actual amount of capital required by the FSA and the terms on which the government were prepared to offer that capital?’

In a final sting, the congratulate Lloyds TSB on what they say may well come to be seen as the ‘sale of the century’.

Postscript: The burt-mathewson-hbos-statement appeared on the Independent HBOS website at 2.20pm.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Burt Mathewson EGM request form on Independent HBOS website as Darling puts frighteners on shareholders ahead of Lloyds TSB vote on HBOS

Significantly heavy traffic has been visiting our news item on the establishment by Sir Peter Burt and Sir George Mathewson of their campaign website for an independent HBOS. Much of that traffic has been clicking through to to the website link which For Argyll published when it became available.

Those looking for the form requesting the current HBOS management to call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the company at which the Burt Mathewson proposal will be discussed, will find it on the website under the section ‘Your Vote Counts’. It is available there as a download which can be printed off and posted to the campaign address or, alternatively, scanned and emailed as an attachment.

It was also made known late last night (Tuesday 18th November) that Chancellor Alistair Darling has issued a ‘warning’ to shareholders ahead of today’s (19th November) Lloyds TSB shareholders’ vote on their bank’s takeover of HBOS.

Although the UK Government had previously said that HBOS would have access to the bank recapitalisation deal in the event of the adoption of an alternative to the Lloyds takeover, Mr Darling has now let it be known that there is ‘no automatic right of access to the recapitalisation scheme’.

He is saying that access to the government deal is not ‘automatic’ and that any bank going back to the negotiating table risks getting a far lower share price than currently offered.

The SNP’s MSP, Alex Neil has, with financier Jim Spowart, fought hard to maintain HBOS independence to protect Scottish jobs from the inevitable losses that will follow takeover. He says of the Chancellor’s manoeuvre ahead of the Lloyds shareholders’ vote: ‘Once again the Treasury seems to be doing everything it can to inject doubt and frustrate alternate plans that could keep HBOS independent and safeguard competition and tens of thousands of jobs’.

Criticism of this schoolyard strongarm tactic is coming from across the political divide. Tavish Scott, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, asks: ‘Is the Chancellor really saying he will allow an independent HBOS to collapse? That is not a credible statement from the UK Government’.

The Lloyds TSB shareholders’ vote should be known tomorrow. HBOS shareholders vote on 12th December.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Swinney reveals UK Treasury has now responded to questions on HBOS

Scottish Government Finance Secretary, John Swinney, revealed in session at Holyrood today (30th October) that he has now received a response from Chancellor Alistair Darling to queries on the recapitalisation of HBOS.

In reference to the proposed takeover of The Bank by Lloyds TSB, the Chancellor had been asked if the £37bn bail-out was conditional on this deal going ahead; and if concessions on competition law would be available to other potential buyers. Mr Darling had also been asked if the Financial Services Authority (FSA) would look again at HBOS in the event of the take-over not proceeding.

According to Mr Swinney: ‘Although the Chancellor doesn’t answer all of the questions, his letter is a helpful intervention into the discussion’.

In describing the letter as making it clear that there are other opportunities for the outcome of the HBOS situation, Mr Swinney quoted some extracts from it.

These included the Chancellor’s statement that: ‘If for any reason the merger did not go ahead, the FSA would need to reassess both banks to determine the extent to which each would need to re-capitalise’. While this statement is generally being interpreted as positive, it is also open to reading as an indication of potential conditionality.

The Finance Secretary told MSPs that it was the Scottish Government’s duty to protect the country’s best interest and this would be the maintaining of HBOS as a independent bank, protecting jobs across Scotland and top management functions at its Edinburgh HQ.

He said: ‘We will continue to have dialogue with the Chancellor to ensure these propositions are fully and properly considered by the United Kingdom Government’.