Comment posted The eurozone crisis and the Independence referendum: time for proactive postponement? by Graeme McCormick.
I’m intigued by your assertion that remaining part of the UK provides ” safety in numbers and the degree of shelter offered effectively by the powerhouse of London and the south east”
The major problem for the UK economy is its over-dependence on the financial sector, a financial sector which is predicated on money which has no real value at all.
Apart from Germany the most successful countries in Europe, and the ones best prepared to withstand the economic fallout, are Scandinavia and Finland.
It’s not size which matters, it’s being sensible and having a sense of your true worth.
London is also the subsidy junkie of the UK grotesquely supported by public funds way above anything any other nation or region of the UK receives on a per capita basis. Economic meltdown will cause the withdrawal of most of that unsustainable support.
If the Uk is going to take the economic hit there is no way in which the London economy will offer shelter. London is the self inflicted sick man of the UK probably Europe ,currently with a patina of wealth ( all fur and nae knickers comes to mind!) and it’s about to have its crutches kicked away.
It will be the rest of the Uk which will have to bale it out.
While Scotland will not find its neighbour wanting, Independence offers a future based on real understandable money and the re-industrialisation of Scotland through renewables,smart manufacturing, and sustainable repopulation of our rural communities.
As the failure of the UK political establishment to handle the crisis becomes ever more apparent the developing majority for Independence will increase significantly.
We have an ideal pilot in Alex Salmond steering the good ship Scotland through the stormy seas. By suggesting the postponement of the Referendum you remove our rudder and we’ll be at the mercy of a financial Corryvreckan
Graeme McCormick also commented
Please prove your assertion that Scotland’s renewables developments are subsidised by Westminster.
As official uk government stat accept that Scotland is s net contributor to the UK tax take so any subsidy comes from the Scottish taxpayer just as hshe subsidises nuclear power too
Lowry sounds like he may have been in favour of red flageavers walling in front of motor vehicles
120 years ago
Recent comments by Graeme McCormick
- Marine tourism business concerns in Crown Estate devolution
I’m told there are concerns amongst the yachting community of a cartel by marina owners. Perhaps the MSP might undertake an investigation
- BG Group joins other North Sea operators in cutting contractors’ rates
Aberdein Considine are prominent supporters of the SNP. They have the ear of all the major mortgage lenders in the UK and handle most of their debt management mortgage books in Scotland.
- Substantial community benefits from the big estates
Surely the question should be this: does the pattern of land ownership in rural Scotland impact on the quality or life of its residents and depopulation worse than the pattern of land ownership in rurual Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Austria or Switzerland?
- Politically skewed perspectives threaten fairness and the rural economy in land reform proposals
Surely the test is this. Does Scotland’s existing pattern of land ownership provide quality of life for rural residents and reverse population decline better or worse than other countries with a significant rural footprint such as Norway, Sweden, Finland, Austria, Switzerland, Ireland and Denmark?
- Syriza, one seat short of overall majority, now talisman for the Scot Nats
Couldn’t agree more Murdoch but is the City of London listening? Usury of the worst kind!
powered by SEO Super Comments