Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

Comment posted Quarrying at Glensanda: aggregating aggregates by newsroom.

Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – apart from the pleasure of actually meeting.

Recent comments by newsroom

  • Bill Clinton ‘s case for Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom
    Wouldn’t normally argue with you on that – but perhaps Kosovo remains a redemptive action, arguably the last Blair took.
  • Indy: separating sheep and goats on Brent Crude and house prices
    Congratulations Graeme, for so comprehensively bucking the trend.
    If you let me know the name of your business, I will personally see that it is passed on at once to all of those householders at the long-stay For Sale boards in Argyll.
    How do you account for your success when the headline selling agencies are reporting stasis?
    There are sellers who really need you.
  • Privatisation: Scottish Government binned its own ferry company in favour of Serco
    For anglophile: The manner of the award of this contract remains a live issue. To the best of our knowledge there is ongoing legal action.
  • Privatisation: Scottish Government binned its own ferry company in favour of Serco
    I take the point here on splitting the vote, Lowry.
    Having been horrified at the bitter divisiveness of this campaign – which has, on the evidence, almost entirely been coming from the nationalist side, I have wondered why a binary choice, which could only polarise, was the decision.
    I have also wondered why it was deemed satisfactory for a country’s constitutional identity to be permanently changed on the strength, potentially, of one vote in a first past the post system.
    We have checked the text of the full Edinburgh Agreement; and the text of the section of law which governs this referendum – and neither document mentions anything about the threshold to win.
    Further enquiries look as if this issue was simply not raised, but covered under a general rubric for referenda which was not scrutinised for its appropriateness to this specific case.
  • Machtoberfest at the Village at Machrihanish Dunes
    Businesses cite endless awards they have been given – and Machrihnish Dunes has received a series of awards since it began.
    In my personal view few awards operate any serious criteria seriously and are mainly a mix of a jolly for the industry in question; an earner – in that in some cases tickets to the award ceremony are sold; and a feel-good pat on the back for the bugginses whose turn it’s reckoned to be.
    But I’m an existentialist.
    This personal view is no reflection on any award Machrihanish Dunes has been awarded.
    We support their efforts – awards or no awards – to bring business to Kintyre because Southworth Developments has made a major, a serious and engaged investment in doing just that, through its two developments in Campbeltown at The Royal Hotel and in Machrihanish, with the unique SSSI dunes golf course, the Ugadale Hotel restoration and the recovery, restoration and major upgrading of the stone cottages above the beach in the village.
    This has been a genuine attempt by a corporation to put serious investment into a particularly beautiful place, which is a bit remote for those who like everything bang on their doorstep; and to do this to turn around the fortunes of the entire Kintyre Peninsula – a breathtaking area I personally drive for pleasure.
    Who sees too much of this sort of business enterprise these days?
    So if the awards they have been given are things on which value is placed by potential customers – they will not be disappointed. The company has done a quality job.
    Machrihanish is not the cote d’azur but this part of the world is characterful and lovely, if on the breezy side.
    And for the record, we are not paid by anyone for what we do. We run our judgment in the interests of Argyll as we see them; and we give our support to enterprises that are the best of their kind and are ambitious always to do more and to do better.
    Lynda

powered by SEO Super Comments

8 Responses to Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

  1. My understanding is that the ship’s conveyor boom is only used when discharging. At that time, the cargo is dropped through the hopper doors in the bottom of the holds, onto longitudinal conveyors which take the cargo to the foot of the vertical conveyor (in the un-lovely tower attached to the front of the superstructure). The vertical conveyor then dumps the cargo onto the start of the ship’s discharge conveyor belt, carried in the boom which is swung from the ship above the quay at Amsterdam, or Hamburg, or wherever.

    My understanding is that, when loading, the quarry’s own conveyer boom carries the stone chips right above the top of the hold, so that gravity does all of the rest (until the destination port), and the ship’s conveyor boom is simply swung out of the way.

    If the ship’s conveyor belt carried the new cargo on-board, you would then need some horizontal conveyors at deck level to get the cargo from the inboard end of that conveyor to the tops of the holds. That would seem to be a bigger change than has been implemented in this rebuild.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. The ship loader is actually on the jetty. It is a very interesting piece of equipment, more elaborate than I had imagined. From what I could see and from what I gleaned from the quarry staff I will try and explain how it works, but I did not get to see how the conveyor collects the stone or how the belt deals with it’s outward travel.

    If you look at the two pictures in this article you will see that it’s base is a massive bridge structure that sits on a turntable/pivot at one end and travels in an arc on rails set into the jetty at the outer end, where you can see a driver’s cab is attached. The conveyor to the ship is set in a boom that travels outwards on top of this bridge. It looks like the back end is held down by rollers that will be below the bridge. The boom conveyor can reach the furthest away corner of any of the ships holds.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Would make a good set for the next James Bond movie, but ideally the baddies would disappear into the mincing machine and that would be best achieved as the ship is unloaded and the cargo sinks into the hoppers at the base of the hold.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. I have no objection to the Glensanda operation whatsoever but . . .

    let no one tell you that heavy industry does not do cute

    compellingly beautiful symmetrical heap of silver crushed stone

    the very specific beauty that is part of industry

    Am I the only one who finds this eulogy to the industrialisation and total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside a bit odd after the vitriol recently poured on the wind industry?
    .

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Surely the difference with the wind industry is that it’s creeping over the surface of the country – and the surrounding seas – like some contagion that risks getting out of control, whereas Glensanda is an admittedly very large scale operation but in a carefully chosen area of a landscape big enough to contain it. Yes, it can be surprisingly visible – for example from the road through Glen Nant, 20 miles away – but it’s surely not the ‘total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside’, and it does have a certain grandeur in its sheer scale.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Digging a mountain away in an operation like that is pretty close to total destruction, is it not?

        It may be necessary, it may be in the most appropriate place and it may be very clever technically, but Glensanda is not ‘beautiful’ by any stretch of the imagination.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • I suppose it depends on the imagination being stretched. Some only see natural beauty while others see beauty in man’s industrial efforts to improve his lifestyle.

          To live the lives we desire we sometimes need to move mountains, cut down trees and extract energy. It’s what we do to make good the impact and generate re-growth that is important.

          The owners and the staff at Glensanda seem to consider the environmental impact of their every action and look to have it in mind at every stage. Vegetation is evident on the “benches” left from the earlier works.

          Fifty years ago when there was a lot of road building, there were small quarries dotted along the roadsides. Today most of these are hardly noticable due to government spending on tidying up schemes, modern machinery and the healing efforts of Mother Nature.

          We can look at the ground around Glensanda and see evidence of the toil of the people who lived there before the Clearances. In the future other generations will see evidence of the toil of today’s people.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.