You always have been very ‘hands on’ …

Comment posted Council Leader, Councillors, CEO, Senior Officers: working relationships by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll.

You always have been very ‘hands on’

Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll also commented

  • I don’t think this should be a discussion about disciplinary action, it should be a discussion about performance management.

    Elected members have a role/resposibility for assessing the performance of the chief executive and it would be a failing on their part if they didn’t do that. I have posted on this in a different thread but it is probably better placed in this thread so I have copied it below.

    However in essence I agree with Simon – we shouldn’t engage in a witch hunt without a proper process being followed. What we should do is ask the administration to get that process in place sooner rather than later as it would appear, on the surface, that there are questions that need to be asked and answered.

    My Other Post

    If the new coalition is to be successful then something needs to be done about what are clearly very strained relationships between elected members and the corporate management team. Whether or not people agree that this Council has been failing under the current Chief Executive’s control is up for debate (I think most people on here know where I stand on the debate) however what can’t be denied is that member/officer relations are not what they should be.

    Depending on the nature of the CE’s contract the new administration will, fundamentally, have two options available to them. If she is on a fixed term contract which requires renewal at a set date then they would be able to replace her at that point if they felt she was not capable of performing her role competently. They may, of course, conclude that she is capable and agree on a contract extension.

    If she is on a permanent contract with no break point then the administration needs to assess whether her performance has been satisfactory and deal with this accordingly. In this scenario she would be treated the same way as any other employee and performance issues would be addressed via a proper performance management process (which could, and I stress could, result in dismissal if, after following a proper process, the performance doesn’t improve).

    Dealing with performance issues at director level is slightly different as the administration have no direct control over the appointment and removal of directors. They have (or should have) performance issues managed in the same way as any other employee however the problem here is that they report directly to the CE and if there are question marks over her competence then you could argue that she is not capable of managing the performance issues of those who report directly to her.

    What the new Administration need to consider is whether or not their opposition to issues such as the schools closures was because they were opposed to the policy, opposed to the lack of competence shown by Council officers during the consultation process and in the consultation papers, or a combination of the two. If they were opposed to the lack of competence to a material extent (and any other areas of competence amongst the senior staff) then they can’t be seen to duck their responsibility to challenge the CE and CMT and ensure they are accountable for their failings. Just because it happened under the previous administration’s watch does not mean the issue should be overlooked.

    Roddy McCuish says ‘The people of Argyll have given us a clear mandate for change in the way the work of this council is conducted.’ It is encouraging to hear those words and there is much talk of ‘change’ in the air’
    Recognition of the desire for change makes it crystal clear that change is required and part of that process has to be to identify what has gone wrong, or stood still for too long, and take corrective action. If that means removal of the CMT or close performance management of them then I urge the Administration to be strong and take the necessary steps.

Recent comments by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll

  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    One man’s degree is another man’s excessive!

    As stated a little further above I agree Jamie, Labour would be wise to take a back seat for another term.

  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    Not really. She wants SNP control in Scotland and for the SNP to have degree of influence in Westminster. It isn’t schizo, it makes sense.
  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    Taking political leanings out of it it is interesting to think about what would be sensible for Labour in terms of a coalition (formal or informal). First off we can obviously discount this talk of them targeting a majority. Of course they, and the Tories are, but neither are going to get it.

    So Labour’s only hope of getting into government is potentially a coalition with the SNP. I say potentially because I am not convinced that between them they will win enough seats to form a majority coalition and a Lib dem/Labour collation certainly won’t.

    The Tories will get the most seats so labour will be in a position where they will possibly enter into a coalition which ‘usurps’ the Tories position as the most popular party. However the longer term ramifications for the Labour Party of entering into an agreement with the SNP could be disastrous.

    This will boil down to whether those at the top of the Labour tree will put the long term success of the party before, or after, their own desire to be in power. If they put the party future first then they would be wise to reject and coalition and allow the Tories to try and rule with a minority government.

    Labour can then try and focus on regaining some support in Scotland and thus addressing the real reason why they are currently incapable of securing a majority government. All this talk of ‘a vote for the SNP is a for for Cameron’ is nonsense. People are voting SNP because Labour became complacent in Scotland for too many years. You can’t take a country for granted for that long and then expect people to still vote for you just because you sound desperate.

  • ONE VOTE for freedom – with Scotland’s BIG Voice
    Or that you don’t have to be a nationalist to be Scottish.
  • ONE VOTE for freedom – with Scotland’s BIG Voice
    That is a fairly typical one sided response but yes I certainly include those idiots in George square in the list of people who need to take a good look at themselves and feel some shame.

    I also include people who have recently attacked journalists for reporting the story about Sturgeon and Cameron, that idiot Paterson for the remark about Sturgeon being hung, the YES voters who went after Claire Lally, the homophobic abuse aimed at Ruth Davidson, the Alex Salmond death threats, abuse traged at JK Rowling and Annie Lennox etc etc etc. We could all name loads and just as easily pretend it is a problem for the ‘other side’ Truth is it isn’t, truth is there are odious characters on every side and the sooner people stop blindly ignoring faults on their own side because of an unhealthy attitude of ‘seeing no evil, hearing no evil, speaking no evil’ the better.

powered by SEO Super Comments

32 Responses to You always have been very ‘hands on’ …

  1. We have now the opportunity to rectify years of bad management and rot in Argyll.

    To ensure that control of the area is handed back to the people through the councillors we have elected, there has to be a clean sweep of the obviously faulty management that has been poisoning our council and costing us millions of pounds in their recklessness and stupidity.

    There is no alternative, Sally Bin Loudon must go.

    A new CEO is necessary, one who is not a power-crazed control freak, but one who is dedicated to the actual requirements of the post.

    Honeymonster Hendry is long in need of being exorcised from his position. Time to hit the golf course.

    The whole Education Department is in a mess (and Social Care), so Carol Walker (don’t know her married name) needs to get the boot as well. Its in need of a total overhaul with new innovative ideas brought in.

    But lets keep Snedders…

    No I am not drunk! I see wee demotion for him. I would actually be willing to keep him on his salary but demote him to being a social carer, wiping bums and cleaning up all sorts of human waste. Open his eyes to the real world.

    I think its perfect for him.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. We, and the birds in the trees, know it has been officer led. The alliance of independent councilors allowed them to ride roughshod over their code of conduct.

    Now is the time to reel them in and make them accountable not just for spygate but for the deliberate exclusion of the many from dialogue/engagement/consultation.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • But led by Walsh, who chose Loudon because he reckoned he could rely on her to do what he wanted, even when he didnt know what it was that he wanted!

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Crazy and Larry right on the money.We owe them nothing great place for the new group to put down markers.Starting with giving the girls from the communications office their jobs back.If they want them.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • As soon as the new Coalition for Progress is formally constituted something on the following lines should be promulgated to all employees of A&BC, starting with the CEO and Directors.
      You are employed to serve the population of Argyll and Bute, to look after their interests, to promote the well-being of this area as a place in which to live and work and to welcome visitors who contribute much to our economy.
      The population of Argyll and Bute deserve no less than that everyone shall give of their best to achieve this.
      Every employee has a valuable contribution to make but it must be clearly understood that there is no place for anyone who holds the view that,”It’s not my problem.”
      There are many challenges ahead but working together and earning the respect and support of our population we can put Argyll and Bute where it deserves to be, a great place for us all to live and work in, and a wonderful place to visit.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Well it didn’t take you lot long – the adminsitration has not even been formally formed yet you want senior officials sacked.

    So, is this what we can expect from the SNP-led ‘Coalition for Progrees’? A pogrom? A night of the long knives? A vindictive lynch-mob howling for sackings?

    You should be ashamed of yourselves.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Simon – no kangaroo courts or lynch mobs, we’re not living in the wild west, and the days of ‘half hangit Erchie’ at Gallows Farland, Inveraray, are long gone. That doesn’t mean to say that you can be naughty.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Simon, c’mon be fair. This is not all of a sudden, I’ve been pleading for them to be sacked for over a year.

      I am nothing if not consistent.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Simon – do you have the nerve to defend the actions of officers over the last few years – keeping elected Councillors and Conveners out of the loop,giving wrong legal rulings in order to stop actions which the elected Councillors wanted to take, faiking to get correct contractual terms for major projects. And more.
    Do you actually think that these sort of things can be accepted as proper behaviour and within the contract of employment of highly paid Civil Servants?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. So what’s the alternative? Are we willing to accept the standard excuse “Ve vere only obeying ordahs”?

    Don’t think so, having seen this lot in action too many times now to know, having seen them publically lecture councillors even on the Alliance of Nitwits.

    Things have to change – or is it alright with everyone that we keep on these officers and continue to allow them to waste what’s in the Council’s bank account?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. This is nothing more than petty, vindictive, nastiness from an on-line lynch mob.

    You want the alternative Crazy??? Well I am surprised I thought you said you used to work for a Council. Well no matter here’s the alternative – if there is one shred of evidence of wrongdoing (and I do mean evidence not the “we hear”, “we understand” or anyother kind of completely unsubstantiated rubbish accusationsof the type offerred all too often on here) – then the Council can instigate its proper disciplinary procedures.

    But you certainly don’t decide on the result you want before you do that. You don’t trample on peoples’ rights and you don’t act in a mean spirited, twisted and bitter way. Because if you do it will come back to bite you on your bum.

    Hopefully McCuish has more sense than the you lot combined!

    I’ll say it again – you should be ashamed of yourselves to join in this type of witch-hunt. Thoroughly ashamed.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Indeed Simon, why allow truth to get in the way of a good story that you can attach the word ‘gate’ at the end of. All good clean fun, until the lawyers get involved.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Simon said: “here’s the alternative – if there is one shred of evidence of wrongdoing (and I do mean evidence not the “we hear”, “we understand” or anyother kind of completely unsubstantiated rubbish accusationsof the type offerred all too often on here) – then the Council can instigate its proper disciplinary procedures.

      But you certainly don’t decide on the result you want before you do that. You don’t trample on peoples’ rights and you don’t act in a mean spirited, twisted and bitter way. Because if you do it will come back to bite you on your bum.”

      And I wholly applaud him. This is absolutely right. I just wish he’d seen the merit in this upright, decent behaviour when the injustices were being visited upon others. These officials ignored it, and the election was it coming back to bite them on the bum. We have better people as councillors now and I trust they’ll go exactly by the book when it comes to dealing with employees. How nice that this will now apply to ALL employees.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. I don’t think this should be a discussion about disciplinary action, it should be a discussion about performance management.

    Elected members have a role/resposibility for assessing the performance of the chief executive and it would be a failing on their part if they didn’t do that. I have posted on this in a different thread but it is probably better placed in this thread so I have copied it below.

    However in essence I agree with Simon – we shouldn’t engage in a witch hunt without a proper process being followed. What we should do is ask the administration to get that process in place sooner rather than later as it would appear, on the surface, that there are questions that need to be asked and answered.

    My Other Post

    If the new coalition is to be successful then something needs to be done about what are clearly very strained relationships between elected members and the corporate management team. Whether or not people agree that this Council has been failing under the current Chief Executive’s control is up for debate (I think most people on here know where I stand on the debate) however what can’t be denied is that member/officer relations are not what they should be.

    Depending on the nature of the CE’s contract the new administration will, fundamentally, have two options available to them. If she is on a fixed term contract which requires renewal at a set date then they would be able to replace her at that point if they felt she was not capable of performing her role competently. They may, of course, conclude that she is capable and agree on a contract extension.

    If she is on a permanent contract with no break point then the administration needs to assess whether her performance has been satisfactory and deal with this accordingly. In this scenario she would be treated the same way as any other employee and performance issues would be addressed via a proper performance management process (which could, and I stress could, result in dismissal if, after following a proper process, the performance doesn’t improve).

    Dealing with performance issues at director level is slightly different as the administration have no direct control over the appointment and removal of directors. They have (or should have) performance issues managed in the same way as any other employee however the problem here is that they report directly to the CE and if there are question marks over her competence then you could argue that she is not capable of managing the performance issues of those who report directly to her.

    What the new Administration need to consider is whether or not their opposition to issues such as the schools closures was because they were opposed to the policy, opposed to the lack of competence shown by Council officers during the consultation process and in the consultation papers, or a combination of the two. If they were opposed to the lack of competence to a material extent (and any other areas of competence amongst the senior staff) then they can’t be seen to duck their responsibility to challenge the CE and CMT and ensure they are accountable for their failings. Just because it happened under the previous administration’s watch does not mean the issue should be overlooked.

    Roddy McCuish says ‘The people of Argyll have given us a clear mandate for change in the way the work of this council is conducted.’ It is encouraging to hear those words and there is much talk of ‘change’ in the air’
    Recognition of the desire for change makes it crystal clear that change is required and part of that process has to be to identify what has gone wrong, or stood still for too long, and take corrective action. If that means removal of the CMT or close performance management of them then I urge the Administration to be strong and take the necessary steps.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • This article in concerned only with performance management – an objective responsibility which has not previously been a notable feature in the operations of Argyll and Bute Council.

      This laxity may itself have produced slack observation of responsibilities in the corporate management team.

      Officers must be given the opportunity to show what they can do under a regime that demands integrity, competence and propriety, monitors performance and insists upon due process.

      Should any then prove incapable of responding to these standards, that would be a point where, in any capable and well managed business, the question of their remaining in their posts would arise.

      The past is the past. An enlightened regime which everyone hopes will seed a very different culture for public sector conduct in Argyll and Bute – at an individual and collective level, should have no care for retribution but every care for the calibre and correctness of performance now.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. “You don’t trample on peoples’ rights and you don’t act in a mean spirited, twisted and bitter way. Because if you do it will come back to bite you on your bum.” – said a parent supporting rural schools.

    Simon, welcome to the revolution.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Well said Scruff. Its called Karma Simon, what goes around comes around and we are doing nothing to them that they haven’t ALREADY done to us.

    Un-evidenced claims? Isn’t that what Snedders based 2 rounds of school closures on?

    However, I am in full agreement. This should be done by the book. Assess performance, identify the areas where performance needs to be improved (God that is a long list for some) and if standards fail to rise – you are the weakest link goodbye!

    I never said march in there and P45 them on the spot. A full and proper investigation must be done first into activities to date. Depending on how bad the evidence is that comes back and I am sure there will be some, then appropriate action against the officers concerned must be taken.

    We should not lower ourselves to their often illegal and sub-standard actions.

    Yes, I am a former council employee, going back as far as the Strathclyde days and the behaviour I have seen with my own eyes from Officers has been disgusting and extremely unprofessional and would not be permitted by most other councils to happen. But then in most other Councils, Officers have some respect for the Councillors they serve.

    There are more than just the Officers working at the council though Simon and we know from speaking to people behind the scenes that working for these Officers is a nightmare for many good, decent and hard-working staff.

    These Officers need to change their tune or go. Simples.

    Have a nice day :) I know I will

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Crazy make your mind up – it’s either “However, I am in full agreement. This should be done by the book”

    Or it’s your previous comment

    “There is no alternative, Sally Bin Loudon must go. A new CEO is necessary, one who is not a power-crazed control freak, but one who is dedicated to the actual requirements of the post. Honeymonster Hendry is long in need of being exorcised from his position. Time to hit the golf course.
    The whole Education Department is in a mess (and Social Care), so Carol Walker (don’t know her married name) needs to get the boot as well”.

    Crazy, you really can’t have it both ways…

    And by the way it’s certainly not Karma. Rather it is mean-small-minded-vindictive revenge on officers you perceive to have the audacity to carry out the political wishes of the previous adminstration.

    I shall have a nice day thank you – and a clear conscience. ;)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • So what are you saying Simon? That it is a case of only following orders? Is that what has been going on all this time? If so, then who’s exactly? You are hinting at the former administration. Is that a case of you “understand” or “hear” that it was them? Or are you willing to come right out and say it? According to you Newsie is always doing it, are you going to be a hypocrite with your own comments?

      And karma? Let’s not forget, I would not be on here having a rant without Cleland Sneddon having rattled my cage. If he’d done a good, fair job and followed the law, I would have nothing to complain about and there would probably not be a Luss Primary School anymore.

      My first comment was made partly in jest, I thought that would be obvious. My second was to clarify my true position on this.

      Investigate practices so far.

      Find evidence (which I am sure there will be – including interviewing the 2 Media staff that got suspended – does anyone actually know what the joke was? I’d love to know).

      Then sack Loudon if it is appropriate.

      Walker – there are clear issues in Education. Her staff hate her. She has 2 levels of completely unnecessary management that are seemingly ineffective because reports are coming into ARSN of massive management issues in the Secondary Schools of Argyll.

      But again, proceedure applies. Investigate, find evidence and then a wee look at her contract and see what we can do.

      I think you are being a wee bitty optimistic that all these officers who have displayed arrogance and incompetence on such huge levels can have complete personality transplants.

      That would be as realistic as you and I going to the pub together.

      My conscience is always clear. I’m a good girl.

      Most of the time ;)

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. I really hope that Duncan MacIntyre is called to explain his misleading campaign literature. He should NOT have been allowed to get away with giving misleading and false voting advice on his pamphlet. And, as he only scraped in by eleven votes, it makes you wonder if that misleading advice didn’t account for him getting re-elected.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. This is an excellent article and I agree with the ‘newsroom’ it is primarily about performance not an opportunity for old scores to be settled.
    This may be a new administration but many of the councillors are not new and come with experience.
    Yes we need to change the root and branch running of Kilmory and maybe some people will need to go if they cannot understand exactly what their role is…as the article plainly sets out.
    In the past Officers have had too much power, the balance needs to be redressed. Aslo in the past the Council has not only been seen by other councils as inept but they have also become a laughing stock.
    It is time for Argyll & Bute Council to become a competent and open administration. No more lock outs and secret deals.
    I have every faith in this new administration.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Please allow this new coalition and its leader Roddy Mccuish the time they need to put their team together before we try to pre-empt any actions on their part. It is positive just to see a new approach to running our council. The new Committee chair persons and local area representation have a lot to deliver and if they prove to be as honest and efficient as most of us hope, then will be the time for the Dinosaurs and miscreants of the past to consider their positions.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • There is no formal council as yet. Although it seems clear what the administration will almost certainly be, nothing is formal until the full election process is complete.

        There is a council meeting on 22nd May where rival motions are likely to be advanced proposing specific pairings of Leader and Deputy Leader. The group with the greatest number of supporting councillors votes its choice through.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. Interest post by Simon,

    The person is in fight or flight mode. Obviously personally threatened by the recent democratic changes. The use of the ” you don’t” and “you don’t” indicates a person very much being pushed into a very uncomfortable position, with real concern over the future.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Long time no comment Ourman. Hope you are well, hows Norway?

      You’ll also notice as yet there has been no reply to my questions.

      Now even though Simon may be in Tiree “hanging ten”, I also know for a fact there is internet out there as my cousin is never off Facebook.

      Perhaps Simon is about to vanish again. Shame, I was enjoying the debate.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.