Comment posted Scottish government’s mad plan for rural parliament by newsroom.
For Jamie McIntyre: You’re very welcome to contribute to For Argyll – and we wish Ardnamurchan was still with us on paper as well as in spirit.
Everyone interested in doing so is ‘entitled’ to contribute here as they wish – and is welcome. Neither we nor our readers are parochial and everyone is interested in informed discussion and variety of positions.
newsroom also commented
- That would be interesting – what a constituency to cover.
- Think about it.
We’ve got a parliament. It’s not good enough. How will a Division B team help? We have to assume the A team has the best available.
A second outfit can only take some of an already slim talent pool out of Holyrood – the one supposed to represent the entire country, listen to it and govern it. It has to be more productive to ensure that the one we’ve got raises its game to deliver this.
A country the size of Scotland cannot have two parliaments – and pay for two parliaments (one to govern and one just to talk???) – without being a broke ruritania with no time to produce and no production revenues to pay for the talking shops.
And when did you last hear any Scottish serving parliamentarian say anything in or outwith a Holyrood debate that was seriously worth paying to listen to or to remember?
The argument for devo max or independence is largely based on the sense that ‘they’ don’t understand us. But if we don’t or won’t understand each other within a small country, why change anything?
On the brink of considering independence, if we cannot imagine rural and urban folk coming to know and respect each other without ghettoised talking shops – which would quickly be seen as the smart crowd and the teuchters – why do we pretend that the sales ploy of an integrated country with a common purpose is anything other than a decoy bride?
- We agree with Barmore2 and Iain S MacLean that LAs as we know them are showing their age and inability.
But this hot-bath notion is not to be a layer of government so it cannot replace LAs – which are metropolitan and urban as well as rural. And a parliament is not a management structure but a debating chamber.
This expensive folie de grandeur is not one to be ‘wished down’. It is one to be put down.
We do not need more empty talk. We need to start making things.
Recent comments by newsroom
- Decoding Helensburgh’s Colquhoun Square: Comet I or Comet II?
Had you made your suggestion on the lighting design for the square to Councillor Petrie who might then have taken if forwards at council level and become singularly associated with it through that process?
We should make it clear that it is popular received perception that associates Councillor Petrie with the ‘Comet’ lights, rather than any claim made by the man himself.
It would be very interesting to know of your complete plans for the lighting of the Square and the thinking behind what you had intended.
- SNP Deputy Leader candidates set out their stalls
It may be that this is an issue Mr Brown has not fully thought through.
He does seem the most capable candidate and the most progressive one.
- Lifeline for wildlife – 5p per carrier bag in Scotland from today
Evidently all ‘single use’ bags carry the levy, regardless of the material form which they are made – paper, plastic or recyclables.
But hygiene related bags – as for bread and cakes, for dirty products [eg with soil attached] and for medicines, are levy free.
We’ve not seen anything yet on take away food packaging, like polystyrene fish and chip or pizza boxes.
- Between earth and heaven: Anthony Gormley’s Another Place
The theft of the Moore from Little Sparta was numbing.
Are the gardens at Portrack House open to the public? Jencks’ work is glorious.
- Robert Wakeham: What’s cooking around our coasts?
This is not a speculative but a factual piece.
The single sentence for which there is no documented back up is a question not a statement. This is on what could possibly explain Oceanic Pintail’s highly unusual behaviour about 10 miles off the north coast.
She had been in Scrabster. She left, following the northerly track Mr Wakeham describes towards the point of access to Scapa Flow from the wes; tand then turned sharply SW, levelling out to begin her strange sequence.
She made three successive return passes between Cape Wrath and Brims Ness at steady speed and then went back in to Scrabster.
This part of her task was a ‘test run’ for what?
The question needs to be asked and there is no straightforward reason why the answer cannot be given.
powered by SEO Super Comments