Comment posted Major environmental groups seriously compromised by wind developers’ cash by Techroom.
Webcraft, I think Newsroom has really very adequately answered your query. However, in the interests of giving you my take on things: I read the article with interest, was disquieted by much of it, have filed some of it away to research more properly and moved on.
We have a very open editorial policy here, and as Lynda says both myself and John Patrick are very much more pro-wind than she is. However, in broad terms we adhere to the idea that everyone has a voice, and a view, if that view is contradictory, if it sits in a grey area of opinion, if it espouses a different view, then that is to be encouraged because it widens the debate and gives the conclusions one draws from it depth and strength. As you have so plainly put into the public view on this thread, I am committed to the community I live in, I chair an organisation which is acquiring a forest, and that organisation is also looking at a windfarm. As for Dunans Castle, you are conflating a social enterprise with a Charitable Trust, and it should be clearly stated here, that it was the charitable trust which benefitted from the funding from the Windfarm Trust, for which the Charitable Trust was very grateful.
So to your last paragraph: there is no hypocrisy at ForArgyll, only openness, both to a multiplicity of views and people, and to the right to express them. I’ll turn this around: why is it that you want to accuse us of these things? Why are you going for the messenger? Surely, what we need here is not a picking over of the personal, but the examination of a significant and worrying issue.
Recent comments by Techroom
- Argyll and the Isles’ Secrets Collection: Castle Lachlan and Kilmorie Chapel
Great piece about a place close to me. The Strachur and District Local History Society have published a great book on the genealogical aspects of this which is available from http://www.strachurdlhs.org.uk/
- Andrew Argyle: Politicians’ fashions are changing – green is out, red is back
For those who have wondered about my views on renewables they are published on our new Nationhood piece published today. The quote from me in this thread is in relation to the news that our community had acquired the right to buy Stronafian Forest – a right we exercised in Feb this year. In that context I was referring to the opportunity that renewables offer communities with very little other way of creating an income. And of course that was in my role as chair of the Colintraive and Glendaruel Development Trust, rather than as founder of ForArgyll.com, which are two quite different and distinct roles. Hope that clarifies matters.
- Revelations galore at Cowal pro-union launch
In Newsroom’s absence: David Graham has this correctly. At no time in the article are any of the gentlemen named referred to as thugs. The use of the adjective ‘thuggish’ was not ascribed to any individual, but to unnamed SNP supporters’ behaviour.
- NATIONHOOD: The For Argyll Referendum Project
Like that. Actually, that was one of the major reasons for creating a project like this – take it out of the political sphere and really start looking at what things as a nation we might aspire to.
And @short and sweet – it’s only a fairy tale if you approach the future without intent. You’d have to also admit that fairy tales are a great way into the psyche of a group of people.
- How do you write a tender and appoint a bidder when you know nothing about the subject yourself?
@Newsroom & @Iain Macaskill — I think the thread referred to is no 11. It seems to be still there. I wonder whether Iain was being ironic in his complaint that the thread had vanished? All I would say to his complaint is that the sheer volume of comments on the site, and the number of stories published here often preclude Newsroom being able to reply to everything. As has often been said, we do our very best at ForArgyll.
powered by SEO Super Comments