New administration for Argyll and Bute Council

[Updated below 15.00] In transit yesterday from Western Ross to Argyll, we did not see until this morning Councillor James Robb, Leader of Argyll and Bute Council’s, email announcement of yesterday [9th May 2013]. This makes it clear that the Liberal Democrat and Conservative Groups have joined the Administration at Argyll & Bute Council.

The announcement says, verbatim:

‘ Councillor Robb said “There needs to be consensus and stability to deliver for the people of Argyll & Bute. I was happy to respond in a positive manner to the recent public statement from Conservative and Liberal Democrat councillors who were willing to take the responsibility of working together in the best interests of our communities.  I am delighted that we are able to put aside party politics to further those aims. I am hopeful that other councillors may wish to engage with this refreshed consensual approach.”

‘ Councillor Ellen Morton, Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group said “The approach from James came as a surprise and it was not an easy decision for the members of the Liberal Democrat Group to make, but our first responsibility is to ensure that Argyll & Bute Council is properly run with a secure, steady Administration. I hope we can help to bring that stability about. We have always had a commitment to working positively with other groups.”

‘ Councillor Gary Mulvaney, Leader of the Conservative Group, added “In the current economic climate there are very difficult decisions to be made. We have never shied away from our responsibilities and will not do so now. Argyll & Bute needs an Administration whose Members will work together to agree the best way forward for the Council and then have the integrity and political courage to deliver the agreed policies.”

What we know and do not know

We understand that the Argyll First group of three councillors, which had been part of the previous coalition, has decided not to be part of this one.

We also understand that the Argyll and Bute Independent Councillors group of two councillors has decided to stay in the administration.

We do now yet know the positions of individual independent councillors who were coalition members but we believe that Councillor Elaine Robertson remains as an administration member.

We do not know which SNP councillors remain in the administration. We have no reason to doubt that all of those who were members of the administration at the last council meeting where the most recent chapter of the pantomime took place, are amongst its members. There is a question on how stable each of their commitments may prove to be, as they face internal party pressure to withdraw.

The rumour factory

All sorts of rumours are circulating – chief amongst them that the SNP hierarchy has suspended the SNP members who are part of this new coalition.

This may well be true – for the simple reason that SNP party central’s conduct and decisions since the SNP-led coalition took power has been confused and lacking in any clear and consistent principles.

Anything is clearly possible from this quarter. Its repeated failures to impose the leadership and discipline its supporters expected of it has left it too suffering profound reputational damage.

Other rumours relate to the back-room goings on which, if only a tenth of these are true, show that lessons have not been learned.

Whose interests come first?

This will not be an SNP administration. It will be a coalition administration with SNP councillors in it.

In the light of what we know of the SNP’s actions and inactions in the horror story of the internally beleaguered former SNP-led administration, SNP councillor members of this one may well be free to perform much better than before – and to focus on the job they have to do.

Before anyone starts taking positions, wait and see the final shape of the new administration when it is formally announced. All that matters is the interests of Argyll and Bute. Whether these are to the fore will be clear in what is eventually made known.

THe SNP group’s utterly undisciplined internecine warfare has left party politics in local government, in Argyll and Bute at least, utterly discredited.

In Argyll and Bute this was seen to be actively against considering first the interests of the region. Councillors and their decisions were shown  – on documentary evidence – to be subject to external intervention from the local SNP Constituency Association, in the perceived  interests of the party.

If the new coalition pulls together a local government of all the talents, with a defensible expert in each post, and where every one of them gets down seriously to the business of getting Argyll in shape, businesslike and focused on growth – and with an intelligent social conscience – this has a chance of being a good thing.

Councillor Morton’s focus on the need for stable government and Councillor Mulvaney’s above, on the integrity and political courage needed to steer Argyll through the most difficult economic circumstances, would indicate a constructive attitude with the necessary priorities in place.

Now he and they will need to put the talk into action.

Political parties are curate’s eggs, good in parts and unable to put up a comprehensively capable team – but coalitions can create one.

If this turns out to be a ‘buggins’ turn’ job, with political payoffs to the fore, the jury’s out.

Of course the plots – one cannot call them ‘politics’ – are fun, at the level of the Dandy and the Beano.

The serious issue – and the only one that  matters -  is whether what emerges can be good for Argyll and will be so.

15.00 update: We understand that Councillor Robertson’s position is not in fact known. She is currently away on holiday and is not expected back until next week.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

10 Responses to New administration for Argyll and Bute Council

  1. SNP voters not onlyvote to put SNP in, but also to keep others out. Similarly Libs and Tory voters did same.
    This coupled with the fact that councillors seem to be spending more time, and our money, on jostling for positions and self preservation, is it not time for this whole matter to be resolved through having another local election for ALL councillors.
    Only then would they have a remit from the electorate to do what they are doing, and for any voters to have confidence that the councillors are working at what they are paid to do.
    Ombudsman, audit scotland or even scottish gov should investigate immediately and order this

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. How do the electorate force a vote of no-confidence? Is it possible at this level? It’s all such a mess that they should all be made to stand for reelection.

    And if not, would it be possible in an Independent Scotland? (serious question as focus on accountability of elected official is lacking in plans for an Independent Scotland)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • I intend to do research over the weekend into the possibility that the public can report the ” no-Confidence” to whatever body now monitors the standards and behaviour of councillors. They have let down the electorate, and it would appear that instead of progressing normal duties to the public, have instead been concentrating their time and efforts to self preservation.
      Perhaps FOR ARGYLL or CowalCourier could do an online petition of ” We the undersigned ask for a county wide relection of Argyll & Bute Councillors, as we feel that the current administration and other councillors have lost the confidence of the electorate due to their mismanagement.”

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  3. What a shambles. No council elections till May 2017.
    Another Council leader with another Administration.
    SNP/Libs/Tories/Inds. Will they call themselves a Rainbow Alliance?
    Mike Russell will be content will the ‘real’ SNP Councillors in opposition and the possibility of bringing the 2 who resigned back into re-joining the SNP.
    Roll on May 2017!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. There are no snp councillors in the administration as I understand they are suspended.
    I believe the Constituency Convener still has not resigned as you reported (still no retraction)–stayed true to his convictions.

    Semple Robb and McCuish in my view have no where to go as they plotted behind the scenes ignoring their hard working members, branch secretaries and conveners and certain snp councillors who they tried to bully over the past few months.
    Semple at a constituency meeting last Sunday made it clear he was not going to stand as a snp councillor again –Robb stayed away– so it would appear the deal had ben struck last week.

    As far as I can see there are now only 3 or 4 snp councillors left with 1 or 2 able to rejoin after being forced out by Robb and Semple.
    I agree with John above external audittors from outside should be covering Argyll and Bute with a fine tooth comb.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  5. John
    The Dunoon Observer has an email link to make a complaint about Councillors conduct. This is a good place to start.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. A weeks a long time in politics. Its just amazing how everybody wants elections now. The SNP and THE BEDROOM TAX Tories have decided they are better together. If I was an SNP member or supporter I would be that angry I would post on here under my own name. Actually when I was talking to a gentleman in Oban yesterday he actually said he had his papers to join the SNP.I told him to wait till Friday as there would be some interesting news to help him make his decision one way or the other. Will we have to refer to the SNP councillors that are left as SNP(1) and SNP(2).This is better than waiting for Santa.
    Cheers Neil.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Neil, The party has designed its rules so your scenario is not possible. There can only be one SNP group and that will be the group abiding by party rules and standing orders.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.