Good news from salmon farming sector: Marine Harvest breaks ranks and seeks ASC certification

The major salmon farmer, Marie Harvest, has broken ranks with the rest of the industry represented by the Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation and is seeking Aquaculture Stewardship Council [ASC] certification.

This will mean, as Marine Harvest will be well aware, that the company will have to publish weekly sea lice data on its salmon farms.

This is a major breakthrough for what has been an unenlightened industry, with Marine Harvest the first to understand the imperative for transparent and improved practices for the long term health of the industry and for the important wild salmon and trout fisheries.

Responding to the Marine Harvest initiative, the body representing the sporting wild fish sector, the Salmon and Trout Association Scotland [S&TAS] has given the move a qualified welcome.

Guy Linley-Adams, solicitor to S&TAS’s Aquaculture Campaign says:  ‘In order to receive  this certification, Marine Harvest  will have to publish weekly, farm-specific sea lice data, individually for each of their farms.

This is what the S&TAS has called for for many years and ensures producers stand by their environmental obligations.

For this reason we do welcome Marine Harvest’s decision and hope all other fish farms will follow its lead.

Loch Ewe is perhaps the most infamous case of a fish-farm in the wrong place. The S&TAS wants to see that farm closed.’

However, this isn’t the end of the story.

Marine Harvest still have fish-farms in the wrong places – as do all fish-farmers.

They are too near to wild salmonid rivers, threatening wild fish conservation. Such farms need to be relocated.

Hughie Campbell Adamson, Chairman of S&TAS says: ‘Marine Harvest should be congratulated for recognising their responsibilities and finally accepting the importance of public scrutiny.

‘You now have to ask why both the Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation and the Scottish Government fought so doggedly to stop this very provision being included in the Aquaculture and Fisheries Bill in the debate in Parliament last week.

‘Both claimed that to disclose this information would be detrimental to the commercial interests of the farms.

‘Clearly Marine Harvest see no such problem, and would expect the rest of the industry to follow.

‘This though is just a start. The environment and wild fish will continue to suffer until all production in Scotland is moved to closed containment’.

However, it has to be a very good signal to an entire industry when a major participant understands the need to move forwards towards a more sustainable and transparent aquaculture process.

This is also effectively a recognition of the strength of the case for farm-specific sea lice data that has been made so persistently and with such carefully researched information as that presented by the Salmon & Trout Association Scotland.]

This just might be the beginning of a breakthrough in the stalemate between the two farmed and wild fish sectors for which the Scottish Parliament’s RACCE committee has been calling.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

3 Responses to Good news from salmon farming sector: Marine Harvest breaks ranks and seeks ASC certification

  1. Don’t hold your breath as all this is promised by the end of the decade i.e. 31 December 2019 or 2020 depending on how you count your decades.

    It will be interesting to learn how the sea lice data is to be collected and the methods monitored.

    ASC is sponsored by the WWF and it’s no doubt purely a coincidence that Marine Harvest is a contributor to the WWF.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

    • The ‘end of the decade’ limitation is germane and explain why S&TAS rightly gave the news no more than a qualified welcome.
      It is as admission that change is necessary, though – so it’s important to push for that to be sooner rather than at the end of 2019. There is no reason why it should not be.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  2. The counts would have to be independently done to be worth anything. Why not start them now rather than at the end of the decade?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.