Crazy, if my pointing out as I did …

Comment posted Senior officers failed to process Cowal Games grant extension by Simon.

Crazy, if my pointing out as I did that the ‘update’ effectively rubbishes all the trash that Nesie wrote in the original article can be equated to stirring – then I’m delighted to say I’m guilty as charged. :)

Havr a nice day. Have plenty champers – if not in celebration then at least to drown sorrows. Go easy on cartwheels after champers ;)

Simon also commented

  • As I said in another post Newsie – when you are wrong you never apologise you just re-write, or invent ‘new facts’, or introduce more red-herrings, or squirm out some new excuse just to try to justify your biased, squalid little piece.

    Thanks for illustrating my claim so perfectly. :)

    Have a nice day.

  • Nobody else commenting on Newsie’s climbdown ?? :)

    Crazy????

  • Doncha just luv the update?????

    Seriously, does this ‘update’ not effectively undermines all the invented trash spouted in the original article?
    After all the facts now appear to be after the decsion was taken by the Cowal Gathering asked for soem revisions, these revisions went back and forth until eventually agreed by all and the document signed. The Cowal Gathering are happy with the process and the process, in Newsie’s words, “has not prejudiced the position of the Games”.

    This is either a mistake (and therefore an apology should be issued), or yet another of Newsie’s ‘boorish-and-petty-we-so-wish-this-story-about-one-of-our-seniot-hate-figures-were-true-because-we-and-some-of-the-more-easily-led-on-here-so-desperately-want-it-to-be-true-pieces’.
    And “It has emerged” is so obviously the new “We hear”.

    Journalist? Pffft.

Recent comments by Simon

  • Update on SNP meeting
    Nice one Jamie :)
  • Update on SNP meeting
    Jamie Black “a small cruise ship appears to be aground off Oban”

    Is it a small SNP cruise ship that has recently had several captains and a revolting crew????

    How appropriate if it was…….. ;)

  • Update on SNP meeting
    Newsie “There is likely to be a vote for council leader between the SNP’s novice councillor Sandy Taylor and Councillor Dick Walsh”
    :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) Sandy Taylor:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) Cooncil leader :) :) :) :) This is a joke Right???:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) Sandy Taylor:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
  • SNP tightens party grip on local councillors in further chaos
    Dave – “Words fail me.This is all complete and utter nonsense”.

    Well there’s two points immediately spring to mind from your statement:-
    1. Given their nasty vicious civil war, the mess they’ve made of things and the shambolic behaviour of all concerned – to be honest ANYTHING is believable about the SNP in Argyll and Bute right now. Anything that is except words like professional, collegiate, unity, discipline, putting constituents first, etc etc.
    2. “Words fail me” – well quite frankly that’s an unexpected bonus :)

  • SNP meeting on Monday may be testing time for mega-coalition proposal
    Graeme, “I think you’ll find that the individuals mentioned will be considered past their sell-by date and divisive”

    Well actually the recent evidence suggests that that statement could apply to most SNP Cllrs, your ex-leader, the constituency chairman, the local MSPs and yourself…. :)

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot

11 Responses to Crazy, if my pointing out as I did …

  1. Dereliction of Duty perhaps? Is that in his contract?

    I mean if this is just a simple mistake, it would be easy enough to just come out and own it. “Me so sorry, my bad” etc etc

    …. ah but we are talking about Cleland Sneddon here. A man who even when repeatedly confronted with the truth during the school closures debacle, still could not admit to getting a single thing wrong.

    Hmmmm wonder if he has a new calculator yet? :grin:

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Doncha just luv the update?????

    Seriously, does this ‘update’ not effectively undermines all the invented trash spouted in the original article?
    After all the facts now appear to be after the decsion was taken by the Cowal Gathering asked for soem revisions, these revisions went back and forth until eventually agreed by all and the document signed. The Cowal Gathering are happy with the process and the process, in Newsie’s words, “has not prejudiced the position of the Games”.

    This is either a mistake (and therefore an apology should be issued), or yet another of Newsie’s ‘boorish-and-petty-we-so-wish-this-story-about-one-of-our-seniot-hate-figures-were-true-because-we-and-some-of-the-more-easily-led-on-here-so-desperately-want-it-to-be-true-pieces’.
    And “It has emerged” is so obviously the new “We hear”.

    Journalist? Pffft.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. The update appears to imply that the original article was completely inaccurate in which case it would seem to me that it should also be accompanied by apology to the people whose integrity was questioned in the article.

    Very poor journalism that an article should be so “wrong” – should check facts before writing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Sorry to disappoint the as yet illiterate inhabitant of the kindergarten here – but this is no climbdown.
    It is the reporting of accurate detail of the length of time it took for senior officers to act upon the decisions of the then Executive Committee – on a matter which determines the ability of a major event to plan and manage its finances.
    The decision was taken at the end of September 2011. It was four months before any discussions began with the Cowal Gathering.
    There was very little to be done – a few removals form the text of the existing SLA. How long does that take?
    With the action already late and obviously dilatory, it ws n ot completed by the time Councillor Dance moved her motion on ‘discrimination against Helensburgh and Lomond’ for the council meeting on 28th June. With the potential of this motion to derail the Service Level Agreement between the council and the Cowal Games, the Agreement could not then be signed until the outcome of the motion was known.
    The lack of efficiency, never mind urgency, in senior officers carrying out the executive functions they are paid to do says little about their professionalism, their methodology and their commitment to their work.
    It is also careless or ignorant of the business realities affecting an event like the Cowal Gathering. Mid to longer term financial planning is an imperative in today’s world – impossible when such a business cannot demonstrate the certainty of key support until so late a stage.
    We reported honestly that the Cowal Gathering was content with the way things had panned out – because it was just that we did so.
    This does not mean that the organisation was right to be content – but they are not in a position to be critical in the sort of public sector culture in Argyll and Bute that remains to be enlightened.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. As I said in another post Newsie – when you are wrong you never apologise you just re-write, or invent ‘new facts’, or introduce more red-herrings, or squirm out some new excuse just to try to justify your biased, squalid little piece.

    Thanks for illustrating my claim so perfectly. :)

    Have a nice day.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Ok, reading the update and comments, must admit to being a bit confused (only one coffee in me this morning and really struggling). The whole thing just leaves me with more questions.

    It appears it took a helluva long time for this to be sorted out and payment made. Wonder why? And James Robb is always spot on with finances, wonder what his take is on all this?

    I also wonder who is in/who contacted the Games Committee and who issued the statement that they were happy and if all the committee feel this way.

    I love a good bit of digging, just as Simon loves a good bit of stirring ;)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Crazy, if my pointing out as I did that the ‘update’ effectively rubbishes all the trash that Nesie wrote in the original article can be equated to stirring – then I’m delighted to say I’m guilty as charged. :)

    Havr a nice day. Have plenty champers – if not in celebration then at least to drown sorrows. Go easy on cartwheels after champers ;)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.