Comment posted Another part of the cost of the A83 closure by Robert Wakeham.
The challenge of electricity storage, in the context of windfarms, seems to have been causing a lot of head-scratching for quite a long time, and presumably maximum effort is being put into researching the hydrogen generation option, given the effect this would have on justifying further intermittent energy developments – and on Malcolm.
Robert Wakeham also commented
- Thought you’d gone, Malcolm, Ireland awaits?
- A word of caution, Malcolm, you need to prepare yourself mentally for your arrival in Ireland, there’s no shortage of windfarms there, and as you’ll be a guest in their country it might be wise to go easy on spreading the Gospel According To Malcolm.
- Malcolm, I don’t see my remarks as abusing ‘Ferryman’ as much as defending my position against people who seem bigoted, intolerant, sometimes plain oafish, and reluctant to consider any point of view beyond their own. My criticism of you is that you set yourself up as an authority but don’t do your homework – and cheerful style doesn’t make up for false claims presented as gospel.
- ‘Serious questions’ in your mind, maybe, Malcolm, but you have built up something of a history of presenting your opinions as definite fact, or under or overstating the case for something according to your preferences, rather than reality. For example, your response to Scots Renewables’ first comment on your post 11 above: ‘…some areas round Orkney…how much power are you going to get from that little lot’ – it’s called the Pentland Firth, Malcolm, and I think that you could get rather a lot of power from it. I’m sure you’ll dig up the figures, and if it’s not worth a damn in the bigger picture I’ll buy you one of those seaside windmill toys for Christmas.
- Ferryman: You seem to be getting more than a bit childish – to be intent on creating holes in my comments to cover your own self appointed role as a ferry expert not to be challenged.
Pontoons don’t have to be designed to suit particular boats if they can be ballasted accordingly, but I don’t think it at all likely that the ballasting could be rapidly adjusted to cope with different boats on the same route. As they rise and fall with the tide they have the advantage of not requiring a motor to adjust them, unlike most link spans – less to go wrong.
With regard to the Rest, yes the main problem according to Transport Scotland is separation and slippage of the surface layer, and yes there seem to be quite big rocks in the latest slide. That’s why I was wondering how effective the new steel mesh nets would be at arresting the ‘porridge’ end of the size spectrum.
There’s no way you deserve an apology, Ferryman – far too much sniping, misrepresenting other people’s comments and forgetting to address points that don’t suit your arguments.
Recent comments by Robert Wakeham
- New flybe strategy clear – Edinburgh and Inverness to benefit
My only experience of London City was unfortunate, when I thought I’d be clever by connecting out of Schipol into London City (much nearer my destination) rather than Heathrow. However, it took a four hour wait at Schipol for Thames estuary fog to clear, whereas none of the other London airports was affected. Makes me wonder whether Boris’s scheme for a new mega airport on the Thames estuary is more than a little bonkers.
- Indy and the Monarchy
If the view isn’t blocked by Chinese container trains.
- Indy and the Monarchy
Recognition at last.
- Indy vote trumps dropping of corroborative evidence – for a year
‘…with a face like a bulldog….’ – an unfortunate description, given that everyone knows that bulldogs are British, whereas MacAskill is presumably convinced that he’s not British.
- McGrigor says assumptions on EU membership are insecure
I thought Salmond had crossed the frontier to foment revolt among the border people down in Carlisle. The English should beware of little green men in kilts.
powered by SEO Super Comments