ForArgyll.com: Argyll's online broadsheet.

I’m worried about you Gus; you seem …

Comment posted Council issues prompt response on Martha Payne’s NeverSeconds clampdown by Robert Wakeham.

I’m worried about you Gus; you seem to be getting far too upset at the performance of Roddy McCuish than is good for you – it’s clear that he’s carried out quite an effective damage limitation exercise, considering he’s very new to the job of council leader. It also seems clear to me that he didn’t instigate the ban, despite your belief that he incriminated himself – and it’s worth pointing out that in the same BBC R4 World at One interview he seemed to imply that the council never engaged in censorship and never would, before correcting this in his statement on the council’s website to avoid the inference that the council never engaged in censorship in the past. I’m surprised you haven’t thought this worthy of comment – or could it be that you’re only interested in criticising the council if it gives you the opportunity of having a go at the SNP?

Robert Wakeham also commented

  • ‘reasoned debate’ – and you talk about ‘cheap stunts’, Prof, but won’t elaborate?
  • It’s the ‘cheap stunt’ remark that I’d like you to clarify, but you’re clearly a busy man. Hope the imbibing doesn’t colour your opinions too much.
  • Easy to assume someone of British professorial standing, but across the pond (and maybe elsewhere) it seems that the term is used as loosely as the description ‘city’.
  • So tell us how you know that ‘he was told to do that’, that the the SNP spin machine was responsible for the wording. Tell us what you consider to have been a ‘cheap stunt’, and why. No axe to grind? – come off it, IanFraser
  • Without trying to ‘whitewash’ the new council, it doesn’t look to me as if Roddy McCuish did fail his ‘baptism of fire’ – given his very recent ascendancy to the council leadership, his inheritance of both a damaged public relations office and some senior staff who might have been far too cosy with the ‘old guard’, and the fact that the affair blew up in his face just before the weekend. I think that this coming week might be a bigger test of the whole administration, albeit less in the public eye.

Recent comments by Robert Wakeham

  • Supreme Court finds for appellants on Named Persons
    Karl, though I didn’t attend I did see the start of the ‘blue parade’ because the West Coast Motors’ Citylink bus from Campbeltown arrived at Hillhead just as the marchers were emerging from Botanic Gardens at 10.30.
    There were plenty of them, and passing George Square on West Coast Motors’ (really) Scotrail shuttle bus from Central up to the bus station at 13.30 the square was a sea of blue and white, with a lot of EU flags as well.
    But the highlight of the day – a bit like the Kremlin unveiling their latest nuclear missiles in (the real) Red Square parades – was the unveiling of Scotland’s alternative to Trident.
    This was a piper, in great form, but with his pipes rigged as a multiple flamethrower (pointing skywards, of course).
    I’m told that the occasional heavy showers were no deterrent, and he was still belching flames in George Square.
    Probably required an EU derogation from all those pesky health & safety rules, but it was enough to make any aggressor think twice.
    A.Salmon, you’d have been proud of him.
  • Supreme Court finds for appellants on Named Persons
    ‘Rumbles’ in the City’s financial jungle might need taking with a pinch of salt, for the culture in that jungle seems so heavily committed to self-enrichment that there’s surely little chance of interest in such a long-term investment as Hinckley Point – unless St Theresa writes an open cheque.
  • With Heb Isles in for repairs, CalMac charters replacement vessel to reduce underprovision for Islay
    The update raises more questions:
    1 – if the Finlaggan’s mezzanine deck has ‘inbuilt’ problems, liability might lie with the designer / supplier, if CMAL / Calmac weren’t responsible for the detailed design.
    Maybe the non-performance of the mezzanine deck is the subject of contractual dispute – and, if so, arguably, the cost not only of fixing the fault but in lost revenue etc might not be to the public account.
    2 – It’s easy to assume that an ageing fleet is less reliable, but if adequate resources are committed to maintenance (at increasing cost) to a rigorous standard, and maybe with the accent on preventative maintenance, then surely there’s less inherent risk in running quite a large fleet of ferries with little or no standby resources. The increasingly hefty costs of adequate maintenance would which would have the (perhaps politically unwelcome) benefit of making investment in new replacement ships more attractive. Unless, perhaps, they’re discovered to have ‘lemons’ like the Finlaggan’s mezzanine deck.
  • With Heb Isles in for repairs, CalMac charters replacement vessel to reduce underprovision for Islay
    There was (maybe still is?) a small ‘flying squad of’ engineers from Campbeltown who travelled the world repairing faults in ships on the move, and I got the impression that it was good business.
  • With Heb Isles in for repairs, CalMac charters replacement vessel to reduce underprovision for Islay
    I wonder what caused the Hebridean Isles’ heavy contact with Kennacraig pier?
    The Isle of Arran got into trouble in West Loch Tarbert in 2010 when a mechanical failure led to just such a heavy contact with Kennacraig pier, but that was in February just days before she was due into drydock anyway.
    And there must be a question about to just what degree Calmac’s ship breakdowns are simply due to the age of their fleet, if the Finlaggan’s mezzanine deck was inoperable just when it was most needed.

powered by SEO Super Comments