Argyll's online broadsheet.

I wil repeat my question did Roddy MacCuish …

Comment posted Council issues prompt response on Martha Payne’s NeverSeconds clampdown by ferryman.

I wil repeat my question did Roddy MacCuish leader of the SNP council simply choose his words badly or did he say he was responsible for the ban.

Scroll in 00:26:00

ferryman also commented

  • I don’t know what Mr Sneddon seems to confirm. I only know what what I actually heard Roddy Mc Cuish say.

    As I have written, perhaps he chose his words badly and I also understand his dilemma. However to read that he is “walking on water” and the person to put in front of cameras and the next MP for Argyll and Bute seems a bit rich if he actually instigated the ban.

  • I agree completely. It is not a good situation when a child has to go in to a dinner hall and both she and the staff feel ill at ease. I also have sympathy for Roddy McCuish in dealing with a difficult problem.

    However I dislike people trying to rewrite history when cllr McCuish seems to have said himself he was responsible for the ban. Also of course it is the Council that is responsible for the quality of the meals.

  • So did the SNP Council leader instigate the ban or not ?
    I don’t know much about this I only heard him speaking on the radio and whilst he said he was putting things right he also said he was reponsible for the ban in the first place.
  • Sorry robert but Roddy McCuish leader of the SNP Council he also seemed to say he was responsible for the ban in the first place.
    Listen to his own words on the BBC Iplayer “Its a good thing to do change your mind and I have certainly done that”.
  • Leader of the SNP council Roddy McCuish said “its a good thing to do changing your mind and I have certainly done that”.

    Scroll in 00:26:00 to hear verbatim exactly what he said.

    Perhaps he just chose his words badly but it sounds as if he was responsible for the ban.

Recent comments by ferryman

  • Responses to Scottish Government’s Information Day on potential Gourock-Dunoon ferry service
    As usual newsroom bends things by quoting the MVA report as saying the vehicle service ‘could be feasible’.

    In fact the reports states; “This study has therefore demonstrated that, given the assumptions made and analysis
    undertaken here,a passenger and vehicle ferry service IS feasible.”
    [ see section 9.1.10 ]

    I am not surprised that Serco are interested in what is Scotland’s busiest vehicle ferry route particularly when the competition turns such a massive profit margin from poorly located ports.

    If Serco have wider ambitions for ferries in Scotland, as it seems they do, then Dunoon Gourock would make sense.

  • Scottish Government moves on Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Services provision
    “A lifeline ferry service is required in order for a community to be viable.”

    So Dunoon is lifeline then – good.

  • Scottish Government moves on Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Services provision
    Newsroom says that Dunoon Gourock is “not a lifeline service”.

    I think Dunoon Gourock is an essential lifeline service but obviously Soapbox aka Newsroom does not.

    So where is the definition of “lifeline” so that we can decide who is correct?

    The answer is that there is no definition – Transport Scotland shall decide, route by route, to whom that applies.

    As to contractual terms, look at Dunoon Gourock, anybody can run anything there is absolutely no contractual need for the service to be reliable. So if your route is goung to be tendered in this way you are totally unprotected.

    Of course Dunoon Gourock is only a piddling little route – well no, according to the Scottish Government it is the most important Scottish route for vehicle transport and significant even on European terms, but that of course is not enough to make it lifeline in Newsroom’s eyes.

  • So what will Transport Scotland talk to Brussels about on Dunoon-Gourock ferry?
    Read the report.

    The taxpayer and the people of Dunoon/Cowal can have a passenger only service and pay a subsidy for it.

    Alternatively they can pay the same subsidy and get a passenger and vehicle service.

    Of course if they choose the vehicle service then the subsidy is paid back via berthing fees both to the Scottish Government and Argyll and Bute Council – in other words to the public purse it is for practical purposes free (which the passenger only service is not). Not only that but the operator of the vehicle service makes a larger profit.

    All of which in a Scottish Government produced report meets all EC requirements.

  • Lairds powering on to get Western’s boats completed
    So they are not actually as promised going to be in service for the games this year?

    If they were in service what would the additional car carrying capacity and people carrying capacity per hour have been?

powered by SEO Super Comments

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Related Articles & Comments