Regarding the update which reads ‘Auileen Goodall is …

Comment posted Major success for Argyll and Bute Council education staff and for Kilmodan school by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll.

Regarding the update which reads ‘Auileen Goodall is an Educational Development Officer – not a Quality Improvement Officer. This keeps the pressure on the question of just what the very many QIOs at Argyll and Bute council actually do and whether that is worth what it costs us’

This is an important point of discussion. It would be interesting to know what are the remits of both roles and how much overlap is there. Based purely on title (which can obviously be misleading) they certainly appear to be roles which must have a lot of similar responsibilities. Are we getitng value for money from these two roles?

Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll also commented

  • Yet another success for a school the previous administration, and in particular Cllr Marshall’s criteria, would have us believe is failing.

    A little encouragement and a little support and our rural schools can, and do, demonstrate quite how effective they are and quite how well they deliver education.

Recent comments by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll

  • As latest polls show new SNP leads, what is NOT in manifesto highlights a lost epic opportunity
    That isn’t what Nicola Sturgeon is saying Graeme. She is making it quite clear it would need to be in the manifesto – part of the ‘democratic lock’

    Are you disagreeing with the FM or are you suggesting she isn’t being honest?

  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    I do think the number of times the Tories bring up that letter is a bit pathetic. It was a joke, granted not the smartest one, but a joke nevertheless. For the politicians to actually try and use it as a serious political argument is embarassing.
  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    One man’s degree is another man’s excessive!

    As stated a little further above I agree Jamie, Labour would be wise to take a back seat for another term.

  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    Not really. She wants SNP control in Scotland and for the SNP to have degree of influence in Westminster. It isn’t schizo, it makes sense.
  • ONE VOTE for democracy and the freedom to be different
    Taking political leanings out of it it is interesting to think about what would be sensible for Labour in terms of a coalition (formal or informal). First off we can obviously discount this talk of them targeting a majority. Of course they, and the Tories are, but neither are going to get it.

    So Labour’s only hope of getting into government is potentially a coalition with the SNP. I say potentially because I am not convinced that between them they will win enough seats to form a majority coalition and a Lib dem/Labour collation certainly won’t.

    The Tories will get the most seats so labour will be in a position where they will possibly enter into a coalition which ‘usurps’ the Tories position as the most popular party. However the longer term ramifications for the Labour Party of entering into an agreement with the SNP could be disastrous.

    This will boil down to whether those at the top of the Labour tree will put the long term success of the party before, or after, their own desire to be in power. If they put the party future first then they would be wise to reject and coalition and allow the Tories to try and rule with a minority government.

    Labour can then try and focus on regaining some support in Scotland and thus addressing the real reason why they are currently incapable of securing a majority government. All this talk of ‘a vote for the SNP is a for for Cameron’ is nonsense. People are voting SNP because Labour became complacent in Scotland for too many years. You can’t take a country for granted for that long and then expect people to still vote for you just because you sound desperate.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

16 Responses to Regarding the update which reads ‘Auileen Goodall is …

  1. Yet another success for a school the previous administration, and in particular Cllr Marshall’s criteria, would have us believe is failing.

    A little encouragement and a little support and our rural schools can, and do, demonstrate quite how effective they are and quite how well they deliver education.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. So, is this Aileen Goodall one of these much maligned immprovement officers we keep hearing newsie and FA rubbishing??

    Mmm??

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • We could do chapter and verse on QIOs in general and in particular but it seems thrawn to do that right at the moment because our hope is that things will improve under new political guidance.

      ARSN was always aware that QIOs follow instructions from their employer and indeed it was obvious that some were uncomfortable with the roles they had during the closure consultations, not least the dreadful scripts they had to read from (Vygotsky indeed!).

      Now that there’s a new administration, we hope to see more of the kind of work Aileen Goodall is doing. Given all the negative tensions involved in the closure debacle, I’m sure it’s what our QIOs would rather be doing.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • Just checked our time logs. We posted the update at 08.23 and Simon’s comment to which Barmore 2 refers was posted at 09.09.
          Apologies.
          I had done this time log check myself and had not noticed the days, only the hours.
          Simon posted his comment on 3rd June at 9.09pm.
          Our update to the article was on 4th June at 08.23am.
          Lynda

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. It is certainly very interesting to hear what has been happening in Kilmodan.Has this been successful in the other schools across Argyll?
    I would love to hear from the teachers and support staff on the closure story now that they are allowed a voice without
    the threat of disciplne.Or have all the bosses seen the light.Still a lot of money being paid to the QIO,s or is this new title a change or additional staff?
    I would hope that the education department and Carol Walker,s so called leadership will be examined very quickly by the new council along with giving us the answers to spygate and Jo Smith.Is she still sitting at home being paid to get a sun tan.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Well said Barmore 2. Kilmodan deserve our congratulations, as do all the wee schools who keep clocking up one prize or another for doing really special and wonderful work.

      I reckon Argyll & Bute always had the best chance of implementing the Curriculum for Excellence because the wee schools already had to operate that way to an extent and the teachers really know how to make it work. Let’s hope they’re allowed to flourish now so the kids, and their communities, can move forward with security and confidence.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Yes – well done to EDOs, so why shouldnt all the QIOs become EDOs?
    And I hope that Neil McIntyre gets the answers to his questions quickly – I cant think of a good reason why he shouldnt.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Regarding the update which reads ‘Auileen Goodall is an Educational Development Officer – not a Quality Improvement Officer. This keeps the pressure on the question of just what the very many QIOs at Argyll and Bute council actually do and whether that is worth what it costs us’

    This is an important point of discussion. It would be interesting to know what are the remits of both roles and how much overlap is there. Based purely on title (which can obviously be misleading) they certainly appear to be roles which must have a lot of similar responsibilities. Are we getitng value for money from these two roles?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • I think the best people to enquire this with would be Head Teachers across Argyll & Bute and perhaps ask them to list the areas they have received help or have found QIOs and QIMs to actually have been a benefit to them.

      I already know the thoughts of one area – so I would expect much silence to follow such a request.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Surely after the chaos of the rural schools proposed closures the points made by Integrity and Crazy in response to this story would be a great place to start for our new councillors The investigation into duplication of responsibility across the whole spectrum of council departments will surely follow.Jobs can be created and services improved if someone has the sense and guts to do it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. I expect the new Lead Councillor on Education, who knows his area of reponsibilty , possibly better than his appointed staff, to lay down the law to his staff as to policies and guidance. The days of paid staff laying down policy, and failing to give correct information to the elected members and the Council as a whole, are over. One such occurrence such as we have seen in the last few years will lead, I hope, not to resignations and “settlements” but to termination with no recompence. The first real test will probably come in the next 2 weeks with the report on Spygate and the dealing with the culprits in that affair.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.