I don’t think that I’d want to be …

Comment posted Senior opposition members of council not obviously keen to work by Lowry.

I don’t think that I’d want to be at the forefront of yet more criticism after being relegated to the position of opposition. Time for them all to take a back seat and watch how easy the new administration find things.

Let the fun begin!

Recent comments by Lowry

  • Minister’s email to Jackie Baillie shows he has been mischievously misinformed
    I’m unsure why, amidst all the chaos and obvious issues raised by the contract, the Addaction takeover is still going ahead.

    Surely it should be stopped until a full investigation has taken place and a safe and proper service can be provided by the right organisation.

    If there has been any corruption or maladministration this must be the right time to stop the takeover.

  • Too little to late – ADP extends local service providers contracts by a month
    No. To me this has the potential for disaster – do we really want this outcome when it could and should be avoided?

    What right does the service provider have to think that it’s ok to offer such a poor level of service? Who agreed it?

  • Promising start for Kezia Dugdale on North Sea oil as SNP front bench reverts to Salmond’s schoolyard
    I reckon we’ve scored a hit here, chaps. Kassandra has lost the plot.
  • Promising start for Kezia Dugdale on North Sea oil as SNP front bench reverts to Salmond’s schoolyard
    Cobblers.

    The SNP gvt. used the price of oil, plus borrowing, to calculate how it would develop and manage the economy in an independent Scotland. Salmond declared that oil would not fall below $100 pb. The current price of oil exposes the ignorance of SNP ministers in not understanding the risks that would have been taken by basing an econcomy on such an asset. So, the question remains “How did they not see it coming?”

    Thank goodness the majority of Scottish voters realised the stupidity and risks associated with such a policy.

  • Too little to late – ADP extends local service providers contracts by a month
    Apologies – my mistake. However, I still believe that Addaction should not take over until an investigation has determined whether or not the contract was awarded fairly. If things can be delayed for a month they can be delayed for longer.

    It would be better to get things resolved sooner rather than find that an unfair outcome has resulted with the possibility of legal action in future.

    Surely the most important people in all this are the service users. They need a comprehensive service that suits their needs – not one that suits the needs of the service provider.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

18 Responses to I don’t think that I’d want to be …

  1. My, how the worms have turned. Remember when the LibDems joined with the Alliance of Evil and they all couldn’t wait to get positions on these committees…

    or was it just about the cash?

    Argyll & Bute Council have advanced my cynicism to epic proportions :)

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. I don’t think that I’d want to be at the forefront of yet more criticism after being relegated to the position of opposition. Time for them all to take a back seat and watch how easy the new administration find things.

    Let the fun begin!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • So what you’re saying is they should say ‘we are not going to fulfil the role we have been elected to fulfil unless we get to be in charge.’ Sounds to me like a pretty appalling attitude for an elected member to adopt.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. I wouldn’t start crowing just yet newsie. There are potentially a few years(?) of this administration to go. I’ll betcha on two things – you’re going to get a far more effective opposition than you’ve ever seen on the previous council, and, there will be fractures in the ‘rag-bag alliance’* because of the ambitious and able being held back by the less-than-able-but-party-apparatchiks. And that’s without mentioning the serial flippers who have sold their principles for positions and money.

    We’ll see shall we? :)

    ps did you get your media accreditation yet??? :) :)

    pps When do you start your campaign to get private roads and water works adopted by the SNP-led rag bag alliance*?

    *copywright newsie.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Why the clamour for a position on the Planning Committee? Could it be that sitting on it is a more rewarding experience than on other committees?

    Perhaps many of the others are too boring – or complicated.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Newsie just how you equate your fatuous claim to integrity (“Whether or not we are always ‘right’, we are always working to be honest, objective and evidenced in what we say”) with your unsubstantiated claim that “Councillor Vivien Dance, reputedly hanging out for the bestowal from Buckingham Palace of Deputy Lord Lieutenant…? Mmm?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Councillors sitting on the Planning Committee probably feel in a more powerful position than sitting on some of the other committees.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Simon
    Right to point out the in-accuracy of reports on the royal campaign of Lord and Lady Dance – the royal wee understands an OBE would be acceptable to.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. It is factually correct to say they are unpaid places because sitting on, or not sitting on, these committees makes no difference to the salary of a Councillor (unlike some other posts which do receive an additional premium).
    That said I am of the opinion that the standard councillor salary is paid for fulfilling the role of a councillor and part of that role should be to take a place in one, or more, of the necessary committees/groups etc. Any councillor refusing to take on a role should be asked to explain why they are doing so and if that explanation isn’t appropriate then they should be asked to reconsider their position as a councillor.

    I do think we need to differentiate pay from expenses though. Councillors rightly receive expenses for personal cost incurred carrying out their duties. If what they claim for is within the rules set out by the Council then I have no problem with that whatsoever. There will undoubtedly be occasions where a councillor (and I mean in any council) fiddles their expenses, just as there are employees in just about every business in the country who will do likewise and what we hope is that the appropriate processes are in place to catch material breaches (and minor ones to too if possible) and then appropriate action is taken.

    Whether all the journeys etc are necessary is a different discussion and brings us back to issues such as video conferencing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. When paying for expenses should we be looking for “Best Value”, car sharing and using public transport. Video conferencing would open up the democratic process to the people and an audit trail of participation of elected and paid members of the council. Has there been a fees-ability study done on this.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. John,

    I find it hard ot believe anyone would disagree that councillors (and all public sector staff) should be looking at ways of reducing expenses. Car sharing is an obvious one and I would hope that every public sector body promotes it (many have car sharing schemes established within the workplace). Video conferencing is another obvious area to explore and it has been discussed on here before, and suggested by some councillors. I would hope to see this progressed.

    Public transport obviously depends on geography and timetable limitations, something which is a big factor in A&B. There will be many times where the additonal time lost using public transport outweighs the additional cost of taking a car instead of the bus.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • “There will be many times where the additional time lost using public transport outweighs the additional cost of taking a car instead of the bus.”
      Totally agree with what you have stated, an individual transport vehicle will always be more flexible than public transport and may be more appropriate at low volume times. If public servants had to rely more on public transport,would this not have a positive effect on improvements on the system which many of us have no option but use. Video conferencing would seem to be a very positive option.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Is not about time that these members of the “Old Regime” started serving the people of Argyll and Bute and put their own narrow self interest on the back burner. I see Ellen Morton in a letter in the local paper is claiming credit for the money raised for Mary’s Meals by the School dinner system effort throughout the area. Shame on You!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.