Comment posted on Jackie Baillie MSP calls on SPT to ‘get a grip’ on Kilcreggan ferry situation by awsnews
I fully agree that the MCA are those best qualified to make judgements on this matter. I was only trying to highlight that the pictures did support more having occurred than the report states.
I don’t think this could be treated as anything less than a ‘near miss’ in reporting terms as there is a loose mooring line and as you state had the other line parted the consequences could have been more severe.
I would still expect the pier to be a far more robust structure than implied, it was built in a bygone age to accommodate vessels of far greater size and power than the current ferry. Having observed the Waverley use a mooring line to assist in ‘reversing’ around the corner of Helensburgh Pier gives an idea of just how much force these structures can withstand.
awsnews also commented
- “We can see no immediately supportable scenario in what they are saying here”
Apart from the loose mooring line visible in the photo, the blue one in the water?
As for structural damage to the pier I would expect the rope to fail first, if it didn’t then they need to condemn the entire structure as unsafe.
Recent comments by awsnews
- Procurement process begun for two new Clyde and Hebridean ferries
According to CMALs own information the MV Isle of Lewis is just over 100m in length and has a capacity of 123 cars, so roughly the same as the current tender but the passenger capacity is only 680. So the new vessels will have to fit in nearly 50% more passengers, and associated facilities on board. I note the formal notice asks for delivery of the second ferry only four months after the first which could be a big driver as to who can take on the contract.
- Robert Wakeham: What’s cooking around our coasts?
If it was more like 12 miles offshore then it is more likely to have something to do with MARPOL requirements.
- Transport contracts – are Scottish Government’s hands tied or not?
The basis of the justification for the ferry award is contained in the contract notice available to all on www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/
Whilst it is clear there was an option clause within the original contract the issue may arise that it has been awarded to a different legal entity from the original.
Whether there was actually a need to order another ferry at all is an entirely different question.
- Unions and politicians demand suspension of ScotRail franchise in light of new devolution settlement for Scotland
“The reason railways were privatised were the private companies were bust.”
Which private companies are you referring to? There aren’t actually that many operating rail franchises so it should be easy to pin down the ones your are making claims about.
At the end of the day Scotrail are only part of the network that provide the train services here, there is Network Rail, the rolling stock businesses, maintenance providers and of course the cross border train operators to consider.
As a regular rail passenger any initiative from the rail unions doesn’t impress me one little bit.
- Scottish Government invests in future of Ferguson’s shiyard
This was the contract I was referring to in the comment on the COAL thread on Friday.
powered by SEO Super Comments