This seems a little fatuous. Of course we …

Comment posted GoNorth Festival to screen Move short film by newsroom.

This seems a little fatuous. Of course we know where Cove is, what Rosneath is and that the peninsula is called the Rosneath peninsula.
We refer to the Cowal peninsula as Cowal – as does everyone else and no one in Cowal has complained (yet). Sometimes the familiar version seems more fluent – but we apologise for irritating you.
We are not a cheerleader for Clydelink. We have been critical of their shortcomings but we have not joined in their demonisation.
The principal fault here – and it is a serious one – lies with the principal in the action and that is SPT.
The management of this tender contract was ridiculous in so many ways and not remotely defensible.
But any business has the right to tender, the right to accept the award of a contract and the right to do its best then to fulfil that contract.
We fully understand and sympathise with the damaging disruption to ordered life in the peninsula and the destabilising impact of the unreliability of the Clydelink service to date.
But your argument is with SPT. Splitting your focus in hammering Clydelink is politically inept.

Recent comments by newsroom

• Institute of Fiscal Studies economist looks at fiscal context of independent Scotland
  The link to Mr Emmerson’s presentation has been given in the article above from the outset.
  And – in genuine puzzlement – what precisely do you see as ‘spin’?
• Colonsay votes 60%-40% in favour of proposed Marine Harvest salmon farm
  Freedom Foods is less and different than it seems.
  This article is required reading for any understanding of this tricky situation:
  http://forargyll.com/2013/01/rspca-compromised-by-freedom-food-certification-for-farmed-salmon/
• Institute of Fiscal Studies economist looks at fiscal context of independent Scotland
  We would be be very happy to answer this question if we could.
  But, as things stand, there is no substantive information and economic detail on exactly what economic strategy and its associated policies would be pursued for an independent Scotland.
  The First Minister’s ‘Scotland’s Economy’ paper, recently launched, was profoundly disappointing in this respect and, in its lack of economic substance, replaced by ad-man puffery, was damaging to the campaign’s credibility.
  We can assure you and anyone, that when such information becomes available – and we are sure it will because it must – we will not be prejudging it but will respond to it with open mind and goodwill and the necessary intelligent scrutiny.
  We have WANTED and still want to see a coherent, joined up, strong, imaginative, challenging and achievable strategy and policies put forward for a specific future for Scotland – honestly described in unchallengeably accurate costs and benefits and carving out an identity for Scotland that is realistic and unique.
  The extent to which all we are being offered is essentially the status quo with a new badge and a few costly goody bags to entice ‘Yes’ votes could not undermine the ‘independence’ prospectus more thoroughly.
  No one can possibly believe that a change of this magnitude can be made without cost to all concerned.
  It is necessary is to know the realistic costs, perceive the realistic benefits and decide if the price is worth paying.
  We do not believe that the price need be too high or the benefits inconsequential – but as this campaign is being run, the price IS too high and the benefits insubstantial because, in any competent sense, the necessary thinking has not gone on.
  What is being proposed is unrealistic, often unspecific and unproductively expensive into the future – and the easy answers are clearly both misleading and dishonest.
  This won’t do and it won’t do it.
• White smoke rises from Councillor Duncan MacIntyre’s chimney as two-man College of Cardinals settle a deal
  Short and sweet for short and sweet: don’t be simplistic.
  No one could defend Councillor Robb’s sudden swerve last Thursday, leaving his loyal colleagues like flotsam and jetsam.
  But that does not mean that he did not deserve the support he was given by his colleagues when he was given it.
  Life is not a simple business.
• Russell to make parliamentary statement on rural schools today
  In the circumstances of the destructions of the SNP councillors group in the last 12 months, you can hardly expect credibility elevating the importance of ‘collective’ action?
  Being ‘collective’ when it suits one to harvest support from others it not what collectivity or collegiality is about.
  And many in Argyll now know more than enough about your party, its councillors, its members, its structures and its wonderfully elastic ‘rules’.

powered by SEO Super Comments