Comment posted Argyll First endorse Michael Breslin in Dunoon vote by Robert Wakeham.
So, David, I’m intrigued by the way that you obviously feel duty bound to prefix ‘government’ with ‘SNP’. Why? did the previous government not provide grant funding for schools? What prefix should go before your name?
Robert Wakeham also commented
- Seems a bit paranoid to me
- Ife – the proof of the pudding is in the eating; You insult the voters for Donald Kelly by assuming they didn’t know what they were voting for, when he’s an existing councillor with a proven track record and has changed neither party nor affiliations this time around. You seem to be in a right old muddle if you think that the SNP local councillors are in politics to break up the united kingdom – this notion makes the old cold war ‘reds under the bed’ paranoia look positively sane. You need to be let into the secret that local councillors are there to deal with local council matters – some might have ambitions to eventually levitate into national politics, but that’s hardly the point, is it?, they wouldn’t get a free transfer as there’s a small matter of getting elected, at which point you’d be free to scream blue murder as loud as you liked.
- A good illustration of the limitations of national party politics when it comes to local council policies. Aren’t a lot of other party politicians at local level really a disparate collection of independents by other names? The criticism of the alliance of independent councillors for behaving like a party after being elected as individuals – with no coherent shared aims other than to act in solidarity with their cronies (sharing the perks of government) and freeze out a substantial proportion of our elected representatives – was right, but aren’t there clear conflicts in trying to govern an area like this while standing on a national party ticket?
- Wasn’t there a time, not so long ago, when councillors were predominantly independents (at least, as far as the council agenda was concerned) and party politics at local council level in an area like Argyll was almost unheard of? Were councils then as bad as you suggest?
- And that’s putting it mildly.
Recent comments by Robert Wakeham
- Scottish Leaders’ debate produces the epitome of political hypocrisy
SF, I think that people hell bent on divorce might well ‘sometimes zig-zag’, but maybe you’re not so interested in that?
- Russell calls for restitution of island air services suspended in ‘unnecessary and damaging dispute’
Sometimes I think that ‘Simon’ is a construct, rather than a real person.
- How the Royal Navy hedged its bets – or its boats
- Dear Alex…
Look who’s talking!
- Stand off at the OK A814 as Council Roads Department promise remains unfulfilled
What looks like errant HGVs blindly following their satnavs on an utterly inappropriate route might be something very different, but still worthy of public concern.
The curtain-sided truck in the photos looks to be far too tall to pass under the railway bridge at Whistlefield on this road, so – assuming the photos were taken on the stretch alongside Loch Long – any such HGVs must be engaged in military business at either Glen Mallan or Glen Douglas.
These installations are connected by a military haul road, linking shipping at the Glen Mallan jetty with the railway yard at the Glen Douglas arsenal.
I’ll bet anyone that when these facilities were developed the only public road access needed was for small vehicles – all the big stuff was to arrive & depart by train & ship.
If the operation has changed, to require some freight to move by road, this could explain the disappearance and non-replacement of the HGV warning sign.
Presumably trucks like the one photographed are carrying non hazardous material, but it would be good to have this confirmed. And the MOD needs to get itself a proper road.
powered by SEO Super Comments