Comment posted Post-election: what now? by Dr Douglas McKenzie.
An interesting premise. With the SNP as a minority adminstration forming policy but with actual decisions having to find consensus amongst at least a majority of councillors this would indeed produce benefits for the citizens of Argyll.
First the SNP: they have the benefits of party discipline, the ear of Government and because they work for the party rather than themselves will be better at pushing forward plans suitable for the whole of Argyll rather than just their own wards. With the backing of the SNP’s national “machine” they will be much better at keeping the non-elected officials to account as they are not mutually dependent on each other.
You have mentioned their other advantage: Cllr McCuish. I think Roddy is exactly the man for the job of bringing the disparate political sections in Argyll together around common cause. I like his self-deprecating manner, sense of humour and easy way with people. That bodes well.
The tight SNP group can run the actual posts and ensure we never have the sort of situation where an elected spokesperson is excluded from the plans of the non-elected officials.
I would, however, also like to see the SNP administration bring in another couple of councillors from without the group, partly to keep a sense of perspective. Cllr Freeman would make, I would suggest, an excellent deputy leader of the Council.
Demolition of the Executive meetings to be replaced by full council meetings where all councillors get their say would ensure that the decisions of the Council are properly democratic.
Of course, minority administrations are vulnerable to coups so I think there would need to be agreement from some of the other groups to support them for the length of the life of the Council (as the Greens did for the SNP) while not being actually part of the ruling administration. That is a tricky sell for Cllr McCuish but I believe it is possible.
Interesting times then but what we really do not want is the Alliance forming the administration again. Their rejection was not as absolute as I would have liked but the results are pretty clear as to what the electorate in Argyll have chosen as the way forward.
Recent comments by Dr Douglas McKenzie
- Rustle with Russell
More utter rubbish from Lynda Henderson. Have you actually spoken to Bob Allen? Whoever told you the story sold you a pup and in your arrogance you cannot admit to be wrong so you make up this story that he was persuaded not to resign.Your position is completely untenable.
- Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
I’m afraid you condemn yourself by your own words. I don’t think that anyone reading what you have written here and the language you have used would conclude anything other than that you have a deep dislike for Mr Russell and that dislike is leading you to basically lose all sense of either proportion or impartiality. It doesn’t matter how well (or otherwise) you know Mr Russell you are clearly exercised by your interpretation of his actions and it is leading you well beyond the pale in what I would consider fair comment.This vendetta against Mr Russell and the SNP is destroying FA’s credibility and I have to confess that I’m seriously considering whether or not to continue reading FA (which will cheer Malcolm up if nothing else). I for one am becoming increasingly disenchanted by the constant negativity and sheer nastiness that has crept into this blog. I say that with a lot more sorrow than anger because I think that FA could have been great and indeed still could but there has to be a degree of balance, civility and indeed humour. All we are getting here is bile and it is causing me heartburn.
- Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
To be honest, this post clearly shows that you are speaking from your personal dislike of Mr Russell rather than an unbiased analysis of the man. Phrases such as “publicity hungry coward” are well beyond what is reasonable comment. - Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
You don’t seem to understand the separation of a MSP’s duty to his or her constituency and their responsibilities as a Government Minister.Yet again, this is another instance where a member of the Government can do no right: speak up and be condemned as “desperate” or stay silent and be accused of not serving your constituents’ interests.
It is just as well that Mr Russell has broad shoulders!
- Atlantic Islands Centre for Luing: biggest investment in island’s history
Well done Luing – an inspiration to all of Argyll’s communities.
powered by SEO Super Comments
An excellent analysis. It is intersting to note that the “administration” chooses the chair of the Area Committees regardless of the political make-up of these.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
An interesting premise. With the SNP as a minority adminstration forming policy but with actual decisions having to find consensus amongst at least a majority of councillors this would indeed produce benefits for the citizens of Argyll.
First the SNP: they have the benefits of party discipline, the ear of Government and because they work for the party rather than themselves will be better at pushing forward plans suitable for the whole of Argyll rather than just their own wards. With the backing of the SNP’s national “machine” they will be much better at keeping the non-elected officials to account as they are not mutually dependent on each other.
You have mentioned their other advantage: Cllr McCuish. I think Roddy is exactly the man for the job of bringing the disparate political sections in Argyll together around common cause. I like his self-deprecating manner, sense of humour and easy way with people. That bodes well.
The tight SNP group can run the actual posts and ensure we never have the sort of situation where an elected spokesperson is excluded from the plans of the non-elected officials.
I would, however, also like to see the SNP administration bring in another couple of councillors from without the group, partly to keep a sense of perspective. Cllr Freeman would make, I would suggest, an excellent deputy leader of the Council.
Demolition of the Executive meetings to be replaced by full council meetings where all councillors get their say would ensure that the decisions of the Council are properly democratic.
Of course, minority administrations are vulnerable to coups so I think there would need to be agreement from some of the other groups to support them for the length of the life of the Council (as the Greens did for the SNP) while not being actually part of the ruling administration. That is a tricky sell for Cllr McCuish but I believe it is possible.
Interesting times then but what we really do not want is the Alliance forming the administration again. Their rejection was not as absolute as I would have liked but the results are pretty clear as to what the electorate in Argyll have chosen as the way forward.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
All good ideas, and I wonder if it would be too much to hope for government legislation so that never again could a relatively small cabal freeze out so many of our elected representatives from participating in our council’s business. The primary schools destruction scandal should be a warning to everyone – that old quote in defence of Mussolini, that he made the Italian trains run on time, is worth remembering. Any idea that efficient management with the minimum of discussion is preferable to democratic decision-making has proved very misguided.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I think many people, myself included, aren’t too worried about what arrangements the politicians come up with as long as what Argyll & Bute really needs from its Council is delivered. So, whether a minority or coalition administration, it should be judged on how it delivers on the key areas.
For me the Council should be:
Open in approach to all its business – This would include the streaming (as far as possible) of all council meetings and the accurate minuting of all meetings. It should include an acceptance that as many decisions as possible should be taken, after reasonable discussion, by the full council and that all meeting papers should, as far as possible, be publicly available. It should also foster a spirit of openness amongst its staff in their approach to the public they serve.
Efficient in its use of the (relatively) scarce resources – In the modern economic climate true efficiency includes cutting down on needless travel and a careful assessment of recruitment to ensure that the Council can provide adequate staffing for those roles directly involving serving the public, especially those services directed to those in most need.
Have clear targets which would measure success for each part of the Council – Everybody, at every level of the council, should know what these targets are and have ownership of them and the Council should welcome and reward positive suggestions for how any service could be delivered in a more truly efficient manner, whether these suggestions come from staff or service users. These targets should, ideally, grow from staff and service users’ experiences, rather than being imposed in a top down manner.
Promote true accountability – It is essential that those paid for giving advice to the council, whether as senior staff or consultants, should realise that the accuracy and quality of their advice will be assessed and if it is found wanting will have an impact on any monies/benefits paid to them. The numerous errors in advice to the Council and accompanying huge wastes of money have to stop.
Those would do for starters!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Clearly , the main divide in politics in Argyll and Bute is between a nationalist group intent on breaking up the United Kingdom representing one third of council seats and a non nationalist pro Union alternative representing two thirds of council seats .
Any Unionist aligning themselves with the SNP will find themselves suckered into a dead end and certain defeat at the next round of elections .
For the sake of our futures and that of our children the 23 non nationalist councillors must work together and control the levers of power .
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Islay for now,
So wrong, wrong, wrong, on all counts !
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wonder if Islay for ever has anything to do with Islay. Doesn’t sound like an Ileach’s opinion.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I would hope Sally Loudon would be the first to depart Kilmory once the dust has settled.A lot of local painters and decoraters are struggling for work so let them take over her job.Better results and would also save money.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It has obviously escaped Islay for ever’s notice that at the latest Scottish Election the nationalist candidate took over half the vote and I know at least two of the independent councillors who support independence. There are very probably more.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The balance of power in Mid Lothian Council is held by an Independent councillor who has previously financially supported the Scottish Tories to a substantial degree but was forbidden permission to stand as a Conservative -but not a Unionist – candidate. Peter de Vink stood as an Independent and won and now appears likely to work with the SNP group to control Mid Lothian.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0