Comment posted 11th April: George Berry chairing hustings for Oban Wards 4 and 5 by newsroom.
You’ll be right.
But the point about hustings – never genteel affairs anyway – is that you show you have the guts to fight for your hearing.
newsroom also commented
- Stooshie – This is not a place to start but a place to finish.
When we said we wanted this to stop now because it simply repeatedly – endlessly – goes over old ground – we meant it.
When we said that we were asking for our openness and our wishes to be respected – we meant that.
When we said that this did not involve barring but were asking for self editing – we meant that too,
This does not mean that if what we are asking for does not happen we will let it run. We will not. And that includes debate on our decision.
We will not hesitate to disallow comments that do not respect what is clearly constructive common sense in this matter.
- I have edited some material in the comment above – if for no other reason than it has all been said before and I cannot spend endless amounts if time in constant retro-checking and re-moderating.
There has to be an end to this – at least as far as For Argyll is concerned.
There is no value in endless repetition. Life – lives – get stuck in a groove which can go nowhere; and none of us have that much time to waste.
This issue has also hijacked discussion of the hustings in Oban with which it may have a relationship but not an exclusive one.
It is obvious that there are fissures in the Easdale island community of a serious nature. We have not run away from that but have tried to be constructive by considering the situation fairly and presenting a picture of the colliding cultures we have found.
There is also clearly more to it than that but whatever that is, it drags everyone to depths we cannot approach and would have no reason to try.
Yes, we feel that Eilean Eisdeal should be open about its membership. Why ever not?
Yes, we feel that a charity should be open with its own community about its accounts. Why ever not?
But suppose the worst case scenario – that not one of its members is a full time resident on Easdale island or even has little more than nothing at all to do with it….
That small group of volunteers, with whoever their supporting members are, has bpught and renovated the Easdale Village Hall – a lovely and spirits-lightening place that is a real community asset.
They have done a substantial amount of work on the harbour – a matter which is to everyone’s advantage – residents, part-time residents and visitors alike.
They secured the little island museum – again a real communal resource.
They run an entertainments programmne in the village hall that is utterly enviable, with landmark figures from the national and international music scene appearing there.
What does it matter, in the light of this genuine contribution (for which there is no evidence of competing offers) if every one of the members of Eilean Eisdeal comes from Kota Kinabalu?
As we’ve already said, the things they have defensively not done are as likely to spring from weariness and fear of any action triggering another round of accusations.
Whatever the ins and outs of all of this, there is a point where everyone has to ask what can possibly be achieved by perpetuating the situation?
For Argyll, having been as open as possible in allowing matters to be aired and having spent time and care in exploring the issues as best and as honestly as we could, cannot now spend time and webspace facilitating repetitions.
That is not an unreasonable position to have reached. It does not mean barring. It is a pleas to respect our position on this and to self-edit.
Please do not see this as a challenge to produce new grievances and allegations as opposed to repetitions.
Turn this to the positive and write for us on sea kayaking – a matter on which we know you are expert and on which many like us would be interested to know more (from the security of a sofa).
- We are about to remove the second of the two paragraphs of your comment on the grounds of lack of substantiation. In one case you say ‘I can’t prove this…’
This is being done in the spirit of fairness.
We accept that if you had got itemised financial breakdowns those would have presented a definitive picture that would have supported or removed your concerns.
We have seen a report by OSCR on their own examination of the affairs of Eilean Eisdeal – after complaints from island members of the ‘leave things as they are persuasion’. They concluded that, in the case of Mr Mackenzie’s company, it had indeed been paid for doing project work but had demonstrated that it had done a lot of work in a pro bono basis, had discounted more and that the arrangement was clearly of benefit to the charity.
OSCR commented that the work had been untendered and recommended that Eilean Eisdeal: ‘should implement a tendering process ‘… for architectural or building related services’ ‘to ensure all decisions made during the tendering process are clearly recorded’.
It seems fair to us to say that it is foolish of Eilean Eisdeal to ignore the advice of OSCR in apparently continuing to be less than transparent with its entire community.
OSCR regulations on compliance in specific accounting procedures by charitable organisations are extremely rigorous. Specific itemised accounts must exist. It is hard to understand why such breakdowns are not made public.
As we have said before it is possible, in this conflictual situation, that this high degree of defensiveness has more to do with being terrified of giving hostages to fortune than having much to hide – but it is certainly ill advised.
And yes, Mr Mackenzie did directly mislead us in response to a clear and simple question. We continue to find that disappointing.
What we would say is that, whatever the historical ins and outs of your core dispute with Mr Mackenzie, they are probably insoluble but it seems unfair to draw Mr Melville closer to the heart of it.
This risks perpetuating a diseased situation which is no good to anyone, by serially loading it onto the back of a new involuntary carrier.
The two article we published in an attempt to bring some objectivity to the community divisions in Easdale Island are:
- CMAL are responsible for all of the ports and harbours they own – but they do not own them all.
The standout controversy at the moment is that Craignure pier on Mull – owned and charged by Argyll and Bute Council, brings in around £1 million a year from CalMac but has had nothing spent on it for so long it is now unfit for purpose and has been unsafe.
Part of the current consulation on the Draft Ferries Review asks whether or not CMAL should own and operate all ports and harbours.
- On the issue of airports – Brian Keating raised the issue at the Argyll and the Isles tourism summit and made a telling point about the absolute need to develop our area’s air travel and leisure flying sector.
He could not be more right.
We do not need to see Oban Airport closed. We need to see it work.
We need to see Campbeltown airport work.
We need to see our air routes marketed and run for what they are – unique routes to unique places – including the sea plane service.
And the leisure flying market is a crucial loss we’ve sustained in the cack-handed way Oban Airport has been handled before and since its inception.
Is there any other area in Scotland that has the variety of air routes in Argyll and the Isles? And that’s not to mention the airstrips the private flyers can use.
There’s another world up there. And who knows?
Recent comments by newsroom
- Brian Wilson on Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Services tender
You are quite right about the number and degree of confusions in this area.
We are preparing an article for publication which, amongst other things which are quite an eye-opener, will clarify these positions.
- Lysblink Seaways off the rocks at Kilchoan
This does make rather a nonsense of the early decision to send Herakles back to Kirkwall before she even got to Ardnamurchan – because Kingdom of Fife was within 20 miles of Lysblink Seaways.
Hard to see what the role is for Herakles here at this stage.
- Russell offers to meet Council administration to discuss Castle Toward
It has to be said that this is now into ‘flogging a dead horse’ territory.
Of course there is perceived political advantage at play [this is politics and they all do it] – but continually reheating it is an error of judgment and does the members of SCCDC no favours.
They need to be allowed to refocus in whatever way they see themselves shaping their own future – and ‘differently’ is as likely to be better as worse.
But first of all, as human beings, they need a break to recharge. Their efforts have been unceasing.
- Brian Wilson on Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Services tender
It would be good to stick to the issue of Brian Wilson’s piece rather than tack on other infrastructural issues that merit attention in their own right. We have provided opportunity for that in various articles on Prestwick and will do so again.
No one could present evidence to contradict Rob Trythall’s case that there is no business plan for Prestwick – because no such business plan exists. [Nor is there a business plan - economic development strategy - for Scotland.]
However, well below the strategic muscle of a business plan, there was serious merit in the Scottish Government’s recent proposal to have Prestwick designated as the UK’s reception airport for incoming and outgoing flights experiencing difficulties necessitating premature landing.
The point was that this would then not cause hold ups at the big UK hub airports with delays and re routings of other flights; and Prestwick could develop specialist facilities for dealing with the range of such emergencies – which could include the hijackings we hope not to experience.
But for the moment, the CHFS tender is a major issue affecting the entire west coast mainland and island archipelago of Scotland.
We will not lose sight of Prestwick and will very much welcome your input to that challenging major issue so important to the complex and wonderful Ayrshire. Until then, we would equally welcome your thoughts on the issues Brian Wilson is highlighting here.
- The black arts of political spin betray SNP fears in Argyll & Bute
First the hard evidence: if the Conservatives thought they had a chance of taking the seat, Argyll and Bute would be a target seat – it is not; and party central would be funding the local campaign – it is not.
Then, in the interests of objective fairness, no one has accused – and no one could accuse – Alan Reid of having his nose in any trough. He is marked by prudence, modesty and carefulness. He has been written off before and has won with a good majority. He may well do so again, albeit with a smaller majority as votes are more widely spread.
This time he has the added strength, if elected, of being a guaranteed conduit to government if we do end up with a hung parliament. We see this as, surprisingly, becoming less certain by the day; but if the pundits are correct and we do indeed get a hung parliament, the Lib Dems are 100% certain to be part of it, whatever the number of seats they achieve.
In Argyll and Bute, no other candidate can offer this certainty and Mr Reid finds himself with an unexpected but undoubtedly welcome following breeze.
powered by SEO Super Comments