I am not a fan of any system …

Comment posted Ewan Kennedy on the Single Transferable Vote by Mairi.

I am not a fan of any system that is not intelligible to your typical voter. And this one is not. But we’re stuck with it for a while, is my guess.
For a fantastic explanation you should check out the blog of “Lallands Peat Worrier”. He has produced a really helpful analysis of the Glasgow seats – and this link is an example. The charts are so helpful, and his commentary, albeit from an SNP perspective, interesting.

http://lallandspeatworrier.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/craigton-govan-pollokshields-vol-ii-of.html

He also provided a quasi-academic explanation of the whole STV system prior to the elections here: http://lallandspeatworrier.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/rank-local-election-wonkery-glasgow.html
Enjoy!

Recent comments by Mairi

  • Anas Sarwar: on the indyref bus with Labour on the move
    It’s highly instructive to hear what a UK MP like Anas has to say about the situation in the Middle East. He is an influential member of Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East, and his commitment to this area and interest in the issues affecting it pre-date his election as an MP, by some margin. Here’s what he’s said about the most recent violence http://www.anassarwar.org/?p=1230

    So we should judge that booing for what it was: the bullying tactics of political opponents who have little genuine interest in the cause of Palestine. Surely they’d have been listening, if they really cared?

  • SNP in serious split in Oban North & Lorn by election
    And while we’re correcting things, the Council website shows the spelling of her name as: Marri Malloy.

    http://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/sites/default/files/oban_north_statement.pdf

  • Shaming defence from FM as Salmond’s own adviser attacks young No Thanks supporter
    It’s a pity that Loki has gone, because I’d like to thank him for sharing with all of us the positive, personal experience he’s had of our wonderful NHS – across the UK. And also to wish him well with any further treatment he might need.

    He also illustrates so beautifully how – despite being autonomous in each of England, Northern Ireland and Wales – the NHS cooperates across the UK for the benefit of each UK resident. That is a perfect example of how the NHS works for every one of us: we get what we need, wherever in the UK the specialist service is located. This is the positive case for staying united.

    You only need to look at the widening differences in how student fees are levied on people from different parts of the UK to see how – with independence – things could unravel. Since the Scottish government currently charges youngsters from Wales, Northern Ireland and England £9,000 per year to study here, what’s to stop it introducing charges for the reciprocal health care that we all currently get for free?

    They might all say that they wouldn’t. But that’s just what the current regimes are committing to. In future – under independence – there would be nothing to stop either Scotland or the rest of the UK from levying differential charges. As happens right now with university fees, a practice I find wholly discriminatory.

  • Shaming defence from FM as Salmond’s own adviser attacks young No Thanks supporter
    An email designed to discredit a person – essentially a smear – falls firmly within the ambit of the Code. And Campbell knows this, hence his fulsome apology.
  • Shaming defence from FM as Salmond’s own adviser attacks young No Thanks supporter
    This looks awfully like deflection, Loki! Trying to shift the discussion back to last week’s New Statesman interview. Might have been an idea to raise your concerns at the time.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

3 Responses to I am not a fan of any system …

  1. I am not convinced that this method returns a result a lot more representative of the voters intention than a process in which the electors merely chose three candidates.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Its a b###dy mess. Far too complicated for an important event like local(binding) elections. In this case Donald Melville surely suffered and just seems wrong, and this would doubtless be replicated the length and bredth of the country.
      Time to get back to individual councillors for each ward as more folk standing these days due to reasonable salary and expenses. For democracy to be seen to be done it must be understood, and currently its far from that.
      I daresay no particular party suffered more than others but thats not to exonerate this daft system.
      thanks for your explanation mind you Ewan.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. I am not a fan of any system that is not intelligible to your typical voter. And this one is not. But we’re stuck with it for a while, is my guess.
    For a fantastic explanation you should check out the blog of “Lallands Peat Worrier”. He has produced a really helpful analysis of the Glasgow seats – and this link is an example. The charts are so helpful, and his commentary, albeit from an SNP perspective, interesting.
    http://lallandspeatworrier.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/craigton-govan-pollokshields-vol-ii-of.html
    He also provided a quasi-academic explanation of the whole STV system prior to the elections here: http://lallandspeatworrier.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/rank-local-election-wonkery-glasgow.html
    Enjoy!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.