Comment posted on SNP need to back off the ‘Anti-Scottish’ tactic by Webcraft

all too reminiscent of the Aryan myth . . . the SNP will have written its name on the same page as the BNP.

I presume this article is a ploy to win Kintyre1 back into the fold?

At least Paxman only compared Salmond with Mugabe, not Hitler.

Webcraft also commented

• @ Dr Douglas McKenzie

  That last post gets a thumbs up from me – thoughtful and well-written.

• ‘No comment
  ‘
  The last refuge of the political scoundrel. I did expect better than this from ForArgyll. If you are going to make childish accusations of fascism you should at least be prepared to defend them.

  Ken, don’t leave this forum. I think the thumbs show quite clearly that ForArgyll is out on a limb on this one . . . lets’ keep them there rather than legitimising their opinions by ignoring them.

• Ah, Mr. Blix,

  On yet another forum with your customary mixture of invective and disdain I see. Have you found the SNP’s weapons of mass destruction yet?

• @WS

  Sorry,

  You have failed to quote one single piece of ‘cybernat vitriol’ from out of all of the above comments.

  I suggest you back your comments about ‘vitriol’ up with quotes from the comments above or withdraw them.

• I think it was ForArgyll that started with the vitriol, in what has been one of their more ill-considered articles.

  To remind those who may have got too carried away with the comments to have actually read the article, Newsroom said:

  all too reminiscent of the Aryan myth. And look where that led so many

  and

  . . . the SNP will have written its name on the same page as the BNP

  It was an appalling article. I challenge anyone – but particularly WS – to point to any equally ‘vitriolic’ phrases used by any of the defenders of the SNP on this thread.

  Seems to me that ForArgyll is in danger of going the way of the Hootsmon.

Recent comments by Webcraft

• New major financial issue, supposing Scotland voted ‘Yes’ to independence
  Mike,

  You seem to be overlooking the fact that a percentage of current UK defence assets would be inherited by an independent Scotland. From that perspective we already ‘own’ approximately 9% of UK military assets. We would not be starting from nothing.

  Denmark, which is of a similar size to Scotland, had a 2012 military budget of £2.6bn.

• New major financial issue, supposing Scotland voted ‘Yes’ to independence
  Perhaps things will continue as normal, with the new independent Scottish government dealing with defence the same way the UK government has – breaking one promise after another on personnel, basing and capabilities.

  Or maybe not?

  If the SNP form the first independent Scottish government (by no means a racing certainty) then they are committed to an annual defence and security budget of £2.5bn, an annual increase of more than £500m on recent UK levels of defence spending in Scotland.

• Another untold story: Independence and The UK National Lottery
  Not just Webcraft, but also H2O, Fletcher, Morven, Dougie, and other persona I can’t be arsed to remember

  Eh?

• Another untold story: Independence and The UK National Lottery
  No Jamie – what my question shows is that you are unable to support your allegation and so prefer to stoop to personal insults.

  Shame indeed that the debate has come to this level. I ask you again, where are these YES sites that refuse to publish your comments? Come on Jamie, surely you can give us one URL at least . . .

• Cybernat response shaming as Chris Hoy’s rationality highlights a genuine independence issue
  What exactly is the definition of a ‘known cybernat’ , and is it worse or better than being a ‘known unitroll’?

  .

powered by SEO Super Comments