Cant see much wrong with the article. Regarding …

Comment posted Russell nails the ‘bloody disgrace’ of Craignure ferry gangway by phill.

Cant see much wrong with the article. Regarding the ‘canny ship jumper’ Mary jean devon, i wonder how the canny electorate will view the yo-yo ing back and forth by this elected member in the name of self preservation.

Recent comments by phill

  • Dead in the water: Oban transit marina
    Soroba lad, many would agree with your opinion (myself included) re tha marina, in my case due to the unique location that i beleve would have been spoilt. However, many of the individuals mentioned in your comment have done a great deal for the employment in Oban for generations in some cases, allthough you may be correct about undue influence in the case of others. Maybe need to tone down your choice of words though as name calling as you have displayed has no place in debate.
    Very good point about the bus drop off point.
  • Dead in the water: Oban transit marina
    Think we’re all agreed on the Ganavan situation. So sad, but i think it has made the community at large sit up and take note for future concerns.
  • Dead in the water: Oban transit marina
    Spot on Sir. The ‘gangsters’ are well known, and have won every previous battle, all well documented, But thank God we have Concillors who will not be bullied by the would be mafia, and represent their constituents, simple aint it. OBM jog on and good luck.
  • Dead in the water: Oban transit marina
    Agreed ‘longjohn’ as to location,location,location which has never been discussed, in respect of the local/non mariner view to preserve the beauty of Oban Bay including seaweed (fancy there being seaweed on a beach!!!)
  • Dead in the water: Oban transit marina
    Lots of good points, but basically wrong location.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

12 Responses to Cant see much wrong with the article. Regarding …

  1. What a very sad piece from you newsroom.Disappointed you would use this as a SNP election advert but it is good to know where you stand.This shambles has affected locals and tourists alike and when calmac is funded by all taxpayers whatever way they vote to blatantly use it as a political stunt they obviously think our heads zip up the back.
    Power to all the ferry passengers.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Neil – the articles on this site contain a mixture of ‘news’ and ‘comment’ and I would have thought most readers are well able to filter the two from one another and disregard the bits they don’t agree with. It’s not easy to ‘comment’ on an issue without someone somewhere perceiving it as bias, but in this case I’m struggling to see what you are so exercised about. The article is basically news – as in: “MSP calls on council to fix dodgy gangway” – the MSP’s party is not part of the story. This is followed by ‘comment’, echoing Mr Russell’s call on the council to do something about the problem. The bias here seems to me to be no more than ‘For Argyll’

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Cant see much wrong with the article. Regarding the ‘canny ship jumper’ Mary jean devon, i wonder how the canny electorate will view the yo-yo ing back and forth by this elected member in the name of self preservation.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. The responsibility for major ferry termini that form part of our national infrastructure seems to be shambolic.
    The likes of Craignure terminal shouldn’t be in the hands of a local council – especially one that treats it as a ‘cash cow’ at the expense of its own taxpayers.
    The government should take over ownership and responsibilty – and the liability for outstanding essential repair / replacement work should be deducted from the price paid to the council. I wonder if the arithmetic would look as favourable to our council as funding the work and keeping the annual revenue? It is our money, Mr Walsh.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • We felt that the question in the Draft Ferry Review, now in consultation – about whether or not CMAL should acquire all of the ports and harbours served by the state subsidised ferry services deserved a resounding ‘Yes’.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Yes – and with the proviso that a ferry operator can also be responsible for the shore staff, to avoid the situation that arose at Rothesay when Calmac found themselves at the mercy of a shore staff dispute with the council.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Terms used are a bit confusing. Calmac has to add a sum to each ticket sold on this run. It is also applied twice for the outward and return. If you carry on to Iona the same applies there. There is also a sum they have to add for each vehicle carried because piers are owned by council. berthing dues are another charge calmac pay to tie up at the pier.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Surely the point is that, whatever the form of ‘tax’, it’s all being levied by the council (as owner of the Craignure terminal) on the ferry users (either directly or indirectly via Calmac) but the council have failed to maintain fit-for-purpose passenger access to the ferry at Craignure. Money for nothing, just an extra tax on people who travel to and from an island.
      Bloody disgrace is putting it mildly, and when Walsh & co get kicked out they should be made to help people on & off the ferry, and carry their bags.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Nobody nailed Mike Russell yet for the ‘bloody disgrace’ that was Robslee and Hillhead???

    Mmmmm?

    No one going to have a go at the man responsible??

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Surely now this will be a done deal. I know I argued against SNP colleagues in the hustings (my ONLY disagreement in 5 years of working with them) but their insistence that this was indeed ABC’s responsibility can surely mean only one thing???

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.