Many thanks. This is very helpful. …

Comment posted Was this a fair tender process? Government cuts Orkney ferry frequencies within days of Serco contract award by newsroom.

Many thanks. This is very helpful.

newsroom also commented

  • We gave the information direct from the government tender document – which is hardly unresearched.

    If you have other documentary evidence to the contrary, why not give links to it so that readers may see it for themselves, rather than make what at the moment are unsupported declarations?

Recent comments by newsroom

  • Triumph for Helensbugh CHORD as Summer Festival gets going
    And it doesn’t have to cost any more.
    It would have to make the council gardeners’ jobs more interesting – and why not an annual competition for them, recognising their skills and what they bring to where we live?
  • Anas Sarwar: on the indyref bus with Labour on the move
    For information, the indyref bus is laid out as a mobile office, with pairs of double seats facing each other across a table. It is not laid out for mass passenger carrying; and when we were on it to interview Anas Sarwar, it was a very busy place. It has to be. Labour is fighting for its own national survival in the indy war. See: http://forargyll.com/2014/07/the-people-and-the-election-issues-the-scottish-affairs-committee-ignored/
  • Triumph for Helensbugh CHORD as Summer Festival gets going
    Didn’t even know this, Graeme. We were trying to avoid photographing the unfinished upper half of the square and concentrate on the completed lower half – which really is doing the business.
    Will enjoy dropping in for a cuppa next time around.
  • Andy Mahon: a photo-by-photo tribute to Draken Harald HÃ¥rfagre as she arrives in the Mersey
    See Andy Mahon’s latest update piece – with photograph – 21.30 on 19th January
  • Andy Mahon: a photo-by-photo tribute to Draken Harald HÃ¥rfagre as she arrives in the Mersey
    The SNP don’t ‘believe’ that For Argyll has a small audience. They simply keep on saying so, in a transparent attempt to undermine us.
    They are perfectly aware of the scale, nature and reach of our readership – which is why over 2013, they were seriously discussing trying to shut us down, because we were publishing on the chaos they were inflicting on their own SNP-led coalitions at Argyll and Bute Council.
    We had heard rumours that this was going on – and had paid no attention to them: not because we didn’t think it was likely, since on form, it was. It was simply of no account to us.
    We then had the fact of the discussions given to us, unasked, by a senior party insider, delivered as what was intended to be a threat.
    We noted the fact but remained unmoved.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

8 Responses to Many thanks. This is very helpful. …

  1. Well I wait with baited breath to see how The Doc, DMH, Morag, Anne and the rest of the usual suspects put a positive spin on this, the latest bit of chicanery by the SNP!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. @ Newsroom: You will find up-to-date transport statistics on the Transport Scotland website. To save you from having to search for it yourselves, here’s the link to the 2011 figures.
    http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/strategy-and-research/publications-and-consultations/j205779-00.htm
    Given traffic levels on the Pentland Firth service mid-winter — the midday crossing usually only carries a handful of vehicles, often in single figures — I am left wondering if any other bidder saw savings to be made by omitting it when really it’s not needed. Yes, I know it’s supposedly a ‘Lifeline Service’, but be realistic about this — there are still two other NorthLink sailings and also Banksie’s catamaran running three times a day too. Did Northlink themselves (or anyone else) bid to run three runs every day? Without knowing that, criticising Serco is a bit harsh in this instance.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. “When the change of service provider was announced following the tendering process, Orkney and Shetland were assured that they would see improvements to the services. Is this it?”

    I am sure Transport Scotland will find some way to claim its a better service. The claim does not need to have any basis in reality. Look at the improved service we got in Dunoon with bigger boats!

    Does the Orkney service include relief vessels or has that been “improved” so that sailings get cut in half anytime a vessels breaks down or needs serviced – as in Dunoon.

    It is a good point about the contract being changed immediately after companies bid, though presumably even Transport Scotland were not stupid enough to leave themselves exposed.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. The forArgyll article stated “The issue with which we are concerned is whether this substantial change of required service provision, coming to son after the award of contract, invalidates the tender”

    But, as I now understand it, the tender specification essentially invited bidders to reduce from 3 to 2 return crossings per weekday for the non-peak period. The non-peak period was not specified and had to be defined by the bidder.

    So most of this article was un-researched forargyll speculation about an article read somewhere else and then regurgitated as news and information.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • We gave the information direct from the government tender document – which is hardly unresearched.

      If you have other documentary evidence to the contrary, why not give links to it so that readers may see it for themselves, rather than make what at the moment are unsupported declarations?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Having watched Question Time the other night, I was astounded at the paucity of comment in favour of the union. Even Forsyth made an idiot of himself.

    It does appear, yet again, our very own SNP are leading the charge for a ‘NO’ vote in 2014. Their defense probably will be something to do with Green issues or European rules…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.