Comment posted Heavy hand of Olympics commercialism falls on the shoulder of Tarbert Seafood Festival by Pheidippides.
Guides on using and (mostly) not using the brands can be found here – http://www.london2012.com/about-us/our-brand/using-the-brand/index.html There are seperate guides for tourism, commercial and non commercial (including charitable use).
Recent comments by Pheidippides
- More dangerous hurdles for Arrochar’s walking tinies
Surely if the Council/Government have redesignated routes as ‘safe’ walking routes they also have to address the issue of speed within these areas – in other words at the very least lower speed limits to 30 or 20 where it is a school walking route.
powered by SEO Super Comments











Don’t Coca Cola own the rights to the 5 rings image?
Its all hypocrasy innit? Oh well, good luck to anyone coming to Luss for the flame and trying to find a parking spot!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Think Maginot line and find a way round it
How about a local version? Five interlocking curling stones, footballs, discus, girds and cleeks or even rainbow rings, leaping fish or baw faced weans. They could be arranged a wee bit differently.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Maybe Myles should have a “Five Doughnut” day?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Brilliant.
There’s nothing like subversion.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
My goodness, Anne – you could legally bilk this country out of billions (and undercut local shops) by laundering your corporate profits through Luxembourg, but trying to give the Olympic organisation the runaround? That’ll be prison for life, if not execution!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Naaaa. If she changes her name to Murdoch she’ll be sure to get away with it
Like or Dislike:
0
0
This demonstrates just how stupid it was for the organizers of the games to accept sponsorship from multinational corporations. You don’t invite a herd of pigs to a buffet lunch, it is simply in their nature to shove not just their snouts, but their trotters as well, right into the trough.
The solution to corporate sponsorship coercion may be difficult to achieve, but well worth the effort. First, stop buying their stuff. Let them know, through your wallet, that their efforts to brainwash us are counter productive.
Second, if we need money to pay for such events (or anything else of national importance) in the future, we should TAKE the money from then by enforcing the tax regulations rather than beg for a handout. Any money earned in this country should be tax payed in this country, not in the Cayman Islands or Lichtenstein or wherever.
Maybe my comparison to the porcine species was a bit unfair – to pigs. Because on second thoughts they more resemble tapeworms and leeches – pointless and pernicious.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What you have put in words is what many people are thinking. If we can host such a large event to last a few weeks at such cost, why can we not build sustainable homes for all our people. I do mean homes and not houses.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The distinction between houses and homes needs to be kept in mind by all who deal with the world of ‘affordable housing’.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Aye and don’t be singing Happy Birthday too loudly either or Warner Music will be wanting a slice of your cake.
Corporate facism in my book
Like or Dislike:
0
0
These well known health foods for Olympians – coke and mcdonalds
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Has anyone seen this missive from Locog to local authorities?
If it’s on the A&B website….I can’t find it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Guides on using and (mostly) not using the brands can be found here – http://www.london2012.com/about-us/our-brand/using-the-brand/index.html There are seperate guides for tourism, commercial and non commercial (including charitable use).
Like or Dislike:
0
0