Comment posted The shape of the new council by Councillor George Freeman.
For Simon, there is no change in the allowances. Just the same as the ConDemAll administrtaion. The legislation restricts the number and total amount.
Recent comments by Councillor George Freeman
- Robust meeting of SNP Group sees growing resistance to ‘Edinburgh’ influence
The SNP had 13 councillors in May 2012. They now have 11 and within a week or so, they will be down to seven maximum with more to go. A sad story when life long nationalists are turning their back on the party because of folk like Russell, Breslin and Hall etc. - Robust meeting of SNP Group sees growing resistance to ‘Edinburgh’ influence
Who did the people in Campbeltown vote for when they voted for Donald Kelly? Was he not a Tory candidate? As he is now part of the Argyll & Bute for Change Group, I assume that the SNP councillors will be barred from working with him or that Group?
Short and Sweet forgets that the SNP in Argyll & Bute are in the minority!! Short and Sweet also forgets that folk are campaigning in every community across Scotland for a NO vote. Helensburgh is no different.
It appears that nothing else matters as far as the SNP is concerned apart from the 2014 referendum. At least we know that those campaigning for a Yes vote are wasting theri time now. The bookies are now offering odds of 100 – 1 on a yes result. They know what Short and Sweet and H20 are feerd to admit.Why are Robert MacIntyre and Gordon Blair allowed to work in a Group with a Tory like Donald Kelly yet the other SNP councillors are barred from working with them or the Lib Dems!! SNP (Russell) crazy rules I suppose
- Robust meeting of SNP Group sees growing resistance to ‘Edinburgh’ influence
Be careful for what you wish!! - Radically new council group changes all the dynamics: party politics dead in Argyll
Correct. Roddy has been appointe as the new Leader of the Council. - Labour MSP Rhoda Grant’s response to Struan Lodge decision
Having now taken the time to read the original Breslin / Blair motion and what FA tells us was eventually agreed by the Council yesterday, this appears to be a serious climb down by Breslin and Blair.It is now clear that the Breslin / Blair motion would not have been supported by the Council and that is why the compromise by Walsh had to be put forward. We know that the ten Helensburgh councillors support the closure of all Council run care homes because of the ridiculously high costs and would never have supported the Breslin / Blair motion.
Even the Walsh motion that was approved by the Council did not lift the moratorium on placing any new residents in Struan Lodge. All it has done has kicked the issue into the long grass for a couple of months. That was to get Cllr Morton and her Lib Dem colleagues and Cllr Mulvaney and his Tory colleagues to support the Walsh motion.
In their motion that they were forced to withdraw, Breslin and Blair had asked for the Council to rescind the moratorium on new admissions with immediate effect. They were forced to backtrack on this as it was clear that Walsh and the opposition councillors would not support such a proposal.
They should be asked why they decided that they would continue to support the moratorium when the opposition clearly had the numbers to force any decision through the Council and by doing so, have let the Struan Lodge residents and staff down.
powered by SEO Super Comments
First class selection and the point that Ann Horn should have a depute is a sensible suggestion. Her work load will be considerable, and she is the person to bring much needed effective change to this aspect of council activity.
The balance appears to be just right and should ensure the new council administration goes from strength to strength.
We need to give Roddy McCuish and the rest of this new administration the time to get the council moving forward. A realistic observation must be maintained, not just reaction to the problems of the past. We all hope we can see quick effective action as soon as possible but this must be tempered with time to create the new atmosphere that is required within the council.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
PEAR SHAPED – LOL
According to report Walsh’s comment of “embarrassing” hit home as McCuish was unprepared and out of his depth at his first meeting. Seems he had to be rescued by officers all the time as he had no understanding of his brief. 6 months now probably too optimistic. The turn-coat Tory picks up his additional twenty pices of silver.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The only person who should be “embarrassed” is Mr Walsh. Previously leading this council area to the brink of destruction.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sour grapes, Arnie..
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Arnie, do you only have one comment to make? Could you not have reworded it even a little bit since 8.18am?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Arnie is that not virtually the same comment you made on the other thread?
Robert is right – grapes, not pears. Big soor ones.
Your comments don’t seem to be making any particular argument, but are just bitter personal digs. How personal are we getting here? To feel so vehemently, it would suggest you are incredibly close to the situation… perhaps that of the now ousted administration… perhaps even its leader… perhaps finding a little more time on his hands now… and realising he has finally lost… and that his salary is going to drop SIGNIFICANTLY.
Just a theory
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
No idea what the ‘embarassing’ story is but would be willing to wager it is being blown out of all proportion by some bad losers.
If you want to talk about petty embarassing moments in the chambers lets recall Cllr Marshall strolling in late to the Council meeting where Sandy Longmuir tore the council figures apart then challenged Sandy about his credentials. Safe to say we chuckled form the viewing gallery when Sandy obliged him.
I am optimistic that this new administration will be welcoming to external challenge and be more than prepared to amend council papers where errors are highlighted. Something the previous administration, and the current CMT, were never prepared to do. To err is human, what defines a person is how they manage the error.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well done ForArgyll for such thorough and quick reporting. All eyes will be on this new administration and it looks good to me with good ‘attitude’.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Congrats to the new council and I wish them good luck – becvuas ethey might jus tneed it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It’s a sure bet that all councillors in all councils need all the luck that they can get, when you look at the increasing social and economic challenges facing them.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Good luck to the new council.
Now, can someone – anyone – tell me how many people under this regime are getting additional repsonsibility payments compared to the previous administration?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
For Simon, there is no change in the allowances. Just the same as the ConDemAll administrtaion. The legislation restricts the number and total amount.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Thanks Cllr Freeman – I appreciate that. One of the ‘like’ ticks is from me.
So, I guess the fact that the new admisitration has exactly the same number and total amount (of allowances)as the previous admistration really just exposes, yet again, Newsie’s biased blog.
If she keeps inventing rubbish stories like this (you must remember the never-ending ‘rag-bag alliance’, ’30 pieces of silver’ and ‘noses in the trough’ crap) she’ll get her press accreditation in no time….
Have a nice night and sleep safe in knowledge that you have a new Council.
ps You’ll be pleased to learn that the Samaritans have been stood down.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon – distributing responsibility payments as a form of patronage to councillors who are then expected to toe the line and flip-flop on demand is rather different to allocating responsibility payments to those who are expected to successfully rise to the challenge of their extra responsibility – and I very much hope that time proves we’re in the latter scenario now.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well Robert, we’ll see what we’ll see.
Remember you have those two serial flippers Mary-Jean and Robb on board. And of course the whole snp group who were in the admistration with Tricky and Co.(before mike russell told them to get out…)
From the look of things all those who jumped into the SNP-led rag-bag alliance have been rewarded with special repsonsibility posts. I’ll say one thing for them – they’ve got their noses in the trough early this time…
Have a nice evening.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Evening? – way post your bed-time, and no arguing now.
We can talk about reformed flip-floppers in the morning.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon – just as bitter as usual. At least this group of councillors are expected to bring change and hopefully improvements to the folks of Argyll and Bute. We can only judge by performance. The outgoing regime despite the same allowances and payments did little or nothing for this area, actually took retrogressive actions and wasted monies for little or no apparent reason. I am sure if you gave up the amount of time that this new administration will need to and did some of the traveling that they do, you would expect nae demand recompense. Irrespective of political background or persuasion councillors should be given stipends and allowances, we as an electorate just need to be more selective as to whom we select to represent us. If you dislike Mary Jean Devon and James Robb as much as you seem to why did you not stand for election give us your background and let us vilify you?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Have to admit, I thought he was being fairly tame with his comments tonight.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon seems to have forgotten that many members of the previous administration did a complete somersault on their previously stated and widely supported position in order to grab the extra shekels. Many voters did not forget however, and the only surprise is that several of these unreliable specimens managed to get re-elected.
On the other hand several of this new progressive administration gave up substantial extra payments and high positions on the last ruling administration on a matter of principle.
Extra allowances for extra resposnibility is hardly a surprising component of councillors remuneration.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Actually, I am all in favour in paying councillors a decent allowance and extra for additional resposibilities.
What I was doing of course was comparing and contrasting newsie’s treatment of councillors’ allowances in the previous adminstration with this new one.
I recognise that there is a financial cost to democracy – regardless of who is in power. And unlike newsie (and some of the more vociferous on here) I don’t choose to rail against councillor’s allowances if the elected administration is not my first choice.
Have a nice day.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sorry Simon, we have consistently said that councillors must be paid a decent rate for the job we expect them to do. £16k a year is derisory. And we said that when the previous administration was in operation.
All we are interested in in competence and integrity in all quarters.
While one would hope to see integrity whether or not people were paid at all, no one is entitled to expect or demand high levels of competence and dedication on low pay.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
How many DaveMH?
Given there were 9 Senior Councillors.
Two Bute SNP councillors! Dep Leader and Dep Provost.
Any others?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon Councillors are now paid wage.
This has been the case since the 2007 election.
ABC has a Leaders fixed wage(£31/32k) based on the size of the Council and the total budget.
There are 9 Senior Councillors(£24/25k) usually including Senior Opposition leaders based on the results of the Councillor groupings.
The remaining 16 Councillors are paid a set wage(£16/17k)
Additional expenses are reimbursed to all Councillors.
Councillors in each Ward should meet with officers to agree how they will represent the people in each Ward.
This information and agreement to be communicated to the people.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Apols first line should read ‘a’ wage.
Typing practice required!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0