Nobody nailed Mike Russell yet for the ‘bloody …

Comment posted Russell nails the ‘bloody disgrace’ of Craignure ferry gangway by Simon.

Nobody nailed Mike Russell yet for the ‘bloody disgrace’ that was Robslee and Hillhead???


No one going to have a go at the man responsible??

Recent comments by Simon

  • CKD Galbraith say new tax and support proposals create minefield for sporting businesses
    Malkie, Simon is neither wee nor poor. However, I do believe that in order to progress as a society we do need social justice. You tell me, why should the wee shopkeeper/hotel owner/builder in a remote part of Argyll or the Highlands pay NDR whilst the owners of sporting estates don’t???

    Is that fair??

    Why do private schools get away with not paying rates whilst all of the local authority schools in Argyll have to pay rates?

    Is that fair?

    Get a grip Malkie FFS – this is no longer about you and your neighbour and planning permission – this is about the kind of society we want to live in.

    Enough of the tax breaks for the rich.

    Have a nice day :)

  • CKD Galbraith say new tax and support proposals create minefield for sporting businesses
    The abolition of NDR for estates was I understand only introduced by their Tory pals in 1994. If as Newsie says “to place these estates on the negative list for support through the Common Agricultural Policy will create a minefield of uncertainty for sporting businesses and mixed estates”, the I’m quite sure their tax advisers will clarify matters for them.

    The squealing from the well-heeled has begun. Expect the press-release from the very vested interests group Scottish Land and Estates any day now.

    Personally I welcome the abolition of NDR for these estates. And, I would welcome also the abolition of rates relief for private schools. It is an abomination that these private schools, operating as a charities, get automatic rates relief and can qualify for further discretionary rates relief, whilst local authority schools all have to pay rates.

    In both instances it’s a case of the rich oiks looking after their own.

  • Time to stop to think – as the cult sweeps into Campbeltown
    What utter drivel you are reduced to producing Newsie. Opinionated dross disguised as comment and camouflaged by crap.

    Can’t wait for the inevitable comments on the Land Reform Bill and your obsequious, toe-curling, lickspittle defence of the landed gentry of the Scottish Land and Estates. Cutting their NDR relief shock horror!

  • Gigha community ownership on brink of failure
    Newsie’s ‘views and opinions’ fit neatly into the ‘radical turned conservative in later life’ scenario – the once-pretend-right-on-radical who with age, weight and income those self-same views of hers have become – establishment, sterile, withered, barren, bleak and predictably Tory.

    I sincerely hope Andy doesn’t sue – after all NOBODY takes the Ould Biddy seriously anymore….

  • In a party for whom 84,000 members are not enough for candidate selection, will Hosie’s elevation curtail Salmond’s ambitions?
    To get back to the topic – does this mean that people who have been expelled from the SNP, ie local councillors here in A&B, are able to stand again? And, with the support of the SNP?

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

12 Responses to Nobody nailed Mike Russell yet for the ‘bloody …

  1. What a very sad piece from you newsroom.Disappointed you would use this as a SNP election advert but it is good to know where you stand.This shambles has affected locals and tourists alike and when calmac is funded by all taxpayers whatever way they vote to blatantly use it as a political stunt they obviously think our heads zip up the back.
    Power to all the ferry passengers.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Neil – the articles on this site contain a mixture of ‘news’ and ‘comment’ and I would have thought most readers are well able to filter the two from one another and disregard the bits they don’t agree with. It’s not easy to ‘comment’ on an issue without someone somewhere perceiving it as bias, but in this case I’m struggling to see what you are so exercised about. The article is basically news – as in: “MSP calls on council to fix dodgy gangway” – the MSP’s party is not part of the story. This is followed by ‘comment’, echoing Mr Russell’s call on the council to do something about the problem. The bias here seems to me to be no more than ‘For Argyll’

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Cant see much wrong with the article. Regarding the ‘canny ship jumper’ Mary jean devon, i wonder how the canny electorate will view the yo-yo ing back and forth by this elected member in the name of self preservation.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. The responsibility for major ferry termini that form part of our national infrastructure seems to be shambolic.
    The likes of Craignure terminal shouldn’t be in the hands of a local council – especially one that treats it as a ‘cash cow’ at the expense of its own taxpayers.
    The government should take over ownership and responsibilty – and the liability for outstanding essential repair / replacement work should be deducted from the price paid to the council. I wonder if the arithmetic would look as favourable to our council as funding the work and keeping the annual revenue? It is our money, Mr Walsh.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • We felt that the question in the Draft Ferry Review, now in consultation – about whether or not CMAL should acquire all of the ports and harbours served by the state subsidised ferry services deserved a resounding ‘Yes’.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Yes – and with the proviso that a ferry operator can also be responsible for the shore staff, to avoid the situation that arose at Rothesay when Calmac found themselves at the mercy of a shore staff dispute with the council.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Terms used are a bit confusing. Calmac has to add a sum to each ticket sold on this run. It is also applied twice for the outward and return. If you carry on to Iona the same applies there. There is also a sum they have to add for each vehicle carried because piers are owned by council. berthing dues are another charge calmac pay to tie up at the pier.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Surely the point is that, whatever the form of ‘tax’, it’s all being levied by the council (as owner of the Craignure terminal) on the ferry users (either directly or indirectly via Calmac) but the council have failed to maintain fit-for-purpose passenger access to the ferry at Craignure. Money for nothing, just an extra tax on people who travel to and from an island.
      Bloody disgrace is putting it mildly, and when Walsh & co get kicked out they should be made to help people on & off the ferry, and carry their bags.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Nobody nailed Mike Russell yet for the ‘bloody disgrace’ that was Robslee and Hillhead???


    No one going to have a go at the man responsible??

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Surely now this will be a done deal. I know I argued against SNP colleagues in the hustings (my ONLY disagreement in 5 years of working with them) but their insistence that this was indeed ABC’s responsibility can surely mean only one thing???

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.