Comment posted on Has Loch Fyne Oysters been shucked by the right partner? by john in kintyre
Like school defender I can not understand nor see the reasoning in this article.
In the original press release it was quite clearly stated that one, if not the major reason for the tie-up with Scottish Seafood Investments was that Loch Fyne Oysters found it increasingly difficult to secure funding/investment from conventional sources (probably their bankers) to expand the business because of the way it was structured.
It was and is a case of the owner/employees being willing sellers to Scottish Seafood Investments as willing buyers to secure and expand the business.
Can only be good for Argyll.
john in kintyre also commented
- What has your comment to do with the merger?
Recent comments by john in kintyre
- SNP MP calls for UK Conservative-Lib Dem coalition to continue for a further year
Would rather have “poor old Alex” running affairs than both of Len Maclusky’s lap dogs
- Salmond judgment under question in second deception on EU membership
Disgusting point scoring at a sad time Sceptic 1
- The Portsmouth side of the shipbuilding saga
One question that has not been posed.
If there is a yes vote, will the rump rUK be in a position financially to build type26 when they will have 2 carriers without planes and 3 Trident subs to maintain?
- Murray win seals memorable Wimbledon
Go and read some of the venom posted from south of the border on twitter about the Jock called Andy then lets see your comments
- Two more awards for CalMac
Glad you cleared that up Murdoch,
here’s me thinking it was Muirneag that was on the Ullapool to Stornoway truck run and was under the impression that Suilevan was in distant waters plying her trade between North and South Island in the Cook Straight, New Zealand.
powered by SEO Super Comments