Comment posted Marine Scotland identifies 15 new Scottish sea areas for offshore wind by Alex McKay.
Robert is quite right that the areas shown on the map are indicative only showing areas for “research” and NOT areas which will inevitably have windfarms. Indeed, this map should not have come as quite such a surprise to Newsroom, with their highly emotive and ridiculously OTT language “the recoil of a rape”, as this looks like a redraw of a map published last March by Offshore Wind Scotland, a consortium of HIE, SE and the Scottish Goverment: http://www.offshorewindscotland.org.uk/index.php/journey_to_2050/scotlands_offshore_wind_sites
The new map enlarges some of the areas, especially in the Clyde, but the indication of joining Islay to Barra and blocking the north end of the Minch were on the earlier map.
Alex McKay also commented
- Newsroom. I don’t deny you legitimate concern, but you appear to have decided when writing your article to assume that all the areas indicated would end up completely covered in turbines, which a reading of the whole report instead of a glance at just one of the maps it contains would have made clear, so in my view your language was unwarranted, e.g. “unhinged”, “brutalist”,”rape”, “effectively unnavigable”, Frankenstein deskbound madness”. Offshore wind developments are going to happen, and what this new report deserves is cogent argument and considered responses not an OTT reaction such as yours.
Recent comments by Alex McKay
- Lifeline for wildlife – 5p per carrier bag in Scotland from today
Lundavra. The introduction of a levy on plastic bags has hugely *reduced* their use in every country that has introduced it, so do join the tiny minority and behave differently
- Rural business interest in Fisheries Management demonstration day
Mel, you complain about a silence to any comment you make, this time referring to fishing. Studies by reputable scientists published in peer-reviewed journals, rather than opinions of animal rightists such as yourself, show that fish don’t feel pain – their brains do not contain the necessary neocortex. While a continuing debate is fine, the use of emotive language – “blood sport”, “mutilation” – is perhaps the main reason why you get so few responses.
- Is Constance entry to the contest for SNP Deputy Leader designed to thwart Brown?
And so the minority once again tries to rubbish the majority. How very sad and tiny-minded of you.
- Apache considering selling out of North Sea to focus on American shale
Likely to make a bit more money than Prestwick Airport, that’s for sure!
- Mysterious Scottish Government press release on new marine conservation order for South Arran
Marine Conservation Orders like this don’t have to immediately specify the details of the problem that they are acting to prevent. The whole point of them is to act and act quickly. These orders are reviewed by ministers at intervals and can be discarded or kept. In some cases, the person affected can apply for a local public inquiry to be held.
powered by SEO Super Comments