Chest beating. I very much doubt this will …

Comment posted Angus Council just voted 15-14 in favour of secret hearing of proposal to take Education Secretary to Judicial Review by Dr Douglas McKenzie.

Chest beating. I very much doubt this will ever see the inside of a court room.

Dr Douglas McKenzie also commented

  • The decision not to spend the (possibly illusionary) £8M in Abroath does sound a bit like the child who is losing the game so decides to takes his football away.

    Petulance is the term I think we are looking for.

Recent comments by Dr Douglas McKenzie

  • Rustle with Russell
    More utter rubbish from Lynda Henderson. Have you actually spoken to Bob Allen? Whoever told you the story sold you a pup and in your arrogance you cannot admit to be wrong so you make up this story that he was persuaded not to resign.

    Your position is completely untenable.

  • Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
    I’m afraid you condemn yourself by your own words. I don’t think that anyone reading what you have written here and the language you have used would conclude anything other than that you have a deep dislike for Mr Russell and that dislike is leading you to basically lose all sense of either proportion or impartiality. It doesn’t matter how well (or otherwise) you know Mr Russell you are clearly exercised by your interpretation of his actions and it is leading you well beyond the pale in what I would consider fair comment.

    This vendetta against Mr Russell and the SNP is destroying FA’s credibility and I have to confess that I’m seriously considering whether or not to continue reading FA (which will cheer Malcolm up if nothing else). I for one am becoming increasingly disenchanted by the constant negativity and sheer nastiness that has crept into this blog. I say that with a lot more sorrow than anger because I think that FA could have been great and indeed still could but there has to be a degree of balance, civility and indeed humour. All we are getting here is bile and it is causing me heartburn.

  • Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
    To be honest, this post clearly shows that you are speaking from your personal dislike of Mr Russell rather than an unbiased analysis of the man. Phrases such as “publicity hungry coward” are well beyond what is reasonable comment.
  • Russell back in the bathtub, now trying to sink Keith Brown’s boat
    You don’t seem to understand the separation of a MSP’s duty to his or her constituency and their responsibilities as a Government Minister.

    Yet again, this is another instance where a member of the Government can do no right: speak up and be condemned as “desperate” or stay silent and be accused of not serving your constituents’ interests.

    It is just as well that Mr Russell has broad shoulders!

  • Atlantic Islands Centre for Luing: biggest investment in island’s history
    Well done Luing – an inspiration to all of Argyll’s communities.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

29 Responses to Chest beating. I very much doubt this will …

  1. From Kevin Barthorpe:
    Just not long got back from the meeting at the council. I have to say what a farce the same people that voted for the school voted against members of the public being allowed to stay in the meeting discussing the school & possible costly legal action. It was quite funny how our Provost didn’t even allow those against this measure to state their reasons for this. Not only that in the part we were able to sit in on they were talking about a fair democratic process what is democratic about excluding press & members of the public from something so important to our children & local community.
    I have to say I am not surprised at the councils inability to listen to the views of the public, but cannot understand what was achieved by our exclusion from the meeting after all as a spectator you are not allowed to speak.
    I look forward to the result about the decision as to whether or not they decide to take it to judicial review, but am very concious of the fact it it gets the go ahead it is quite obvious to me that those voting for it have no consideration to what the public want & I hope this will result in many of them losing their posts at the elections in May.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. From a reliable source it has come to our attention that Angus Council has voted unanimously against judicial review. The result of the vote, which was cast in private, was 10 for and 19 against. It was also decided at same meeting that the £8m earmarked for the new super school will be spent outwith the Arbroath area.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Very interesting. If this is true is will save the Angus taxpayer up to £40k.
      Is the decision to spend the £8m outside Arbroath a vindictively punitive one? Warddykes School, by all accounts, is certainly in serious need of attention and some modest upgrading would genuinely improve the school estate in the town?
      That said, we cannot understand why, since the £8million was to be borrrowed, it is still to be spent. Is this not an unnecessary expense?

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. I was at the meeting and quite frankly disgusted by what apparently paases for democracy, it saddens me to think that some have come far from the serving of the people road and are well along the self serving road instead.

    Really i wouldn’t mind so much but it is our money they want to play with!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Nothing surprises me with the majority of our council and wouldn’t be surprised if they take this all the way through the courts, but surely they can’t win!!!!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Legal opinion has been taken on this and, while nothing is assured in law, none see anything but the strength of the case for the Education Secretary’s decision.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Is it my imagination, or is the behaviour of Angus Council beginning to show similarities to that of the Syrian government – not of course in terms of murderous violence, but in terms of vindictiveness and contempt for reasoned opposition – and democracy?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. The decision not to spend the (possibly illusionary) £8M in Abroath does sound a bit like the child who is losing the game so decides to takes his football away.

    Petulance is the term I think we are looking for.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • I don’t know why i’m surprised at the decision after all Peter Neild/Nield/Nailed told us that was what would happen ages ago, seems his crystal ball does occasionally work…

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. “Local media sources are telling us that Angus Council has voted to go to Judicial Review.” – latest update from last night above as I type …

    It is now Friday morning. Do we know yet whether they voted for a judicial review or not?

    Why the confusion? (Answer to self: If the Council are in a state of confusion and in disarray then how can anyone else be clear about what they think they’re doing?)

    Is the result of the vote also being kept a secret?

    Or am I just being too dense this morning?

    Summary: Judicial review or not? I’m confused even if nobody else is!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • A press release was issued to local media last night for use this morning.
      Directly informing the electorate who will pay the bill for this does not seem to be a council priority.
      We have simply been told that the decision to go to Judicial Review is definite but obviously the local media have the press release and they need to have the story first so we do not know any detail, such as what the actual vote was.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Not only did they want a secret meeting it seems they want to keep the results secret too, do we the public really come this low down the chain for recieving information?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Peter Nield is (again) reported today in the Arbroath Herald as having said …

    “No one in Angus Council questions officers and strongly scrutinises them more than I do” (

    That’s in stark contrast to what he wrote to me having (not) looked into my very serious complaint and discussed it with Neil Logue that, “we as as councillors must rely on the advice and work of our officers”.

    I think that the Arbroath schools fiasco is in such a mess because exactly the same incompetent crew are steering it as who I had to deal with.

    I won’t put the link in because it’s a different matter. But if you want to read more about what he wrote to me just google “peter nield is reported to have said”.

    I think it is relevant to this discussion but only because it’s the same people running the show with the same disregard to reality.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Nield’s rant in full – fair bet he voted ‘yes’ in the secret meeting.

    ANGUS Council’s convener of education, Peter Nield, was so confident of the case for a ‘superschool’ in Arbroath that as we went to press he planned to request at yesterday’s full council meeting a judicial review of Scottish education secretary Mike Russell’s reasons for calling in the project.

    As reported in last week’s Arbroath Herald, the Scottish Government has vetoed proposals to replace both Timmergreens and Muirfield primary schools with a new facility adjacent to the Westway.

    Councillor Nield said: “The Scottish Government Minister has accepted the two reasons for call in have been addressed. Indeed these were addressed in July of 2011 and are now no longer an issue for refusal. However, he asserts that the school condition report was not auditable and therefore not transparent. This is a completely different reason as to the two reasons for call in.

    “No one in Angus Council questions officers and strongly scrutinises them more than I do and I have found no evidence to suggest that the property department and its surveyors have been anything other than open, accountable, transparent and accurate.”

    Councillor Nield went on: “Angus Council is so confident that we are accountable that you will recall we opened this consultation to Audit Scotland, Tayside Police, the Fiscal Service and provided Mr Ewan Smith, of the Muirfield Action Group, with many thousands of pages of information that he asked for. Indeed Mr Smith has been asked to visit the education department and have explained to him all the processes involved. He has refused.

    “Education in Angus is well run, all our schools are well managed and we have increasing attainment levels, highest school meal up take in mainland Scotland, reducing exclusions, nationally recognised Devolved School Management, Early Years provisions, and leading Curriculum for Excellence initiatives. We have much more successes both from individuals, schools and teachers but this is not about closing a well run school.

    “This is about providing a better education provision for Arbroath and schools which have 21st century education capabilities and flexibility. Forfar, Carnoustie, Monifieth, Isla all have such schools, why not Arbroath?

    “Muirfield was chosen for phase one because it is the worst condition school. Phase two (2014/16) will be the next worse condition and at the moment that does look like Warddykes but we will have to see at the time.”

    Councillor Nield stressed: “The Minister has not in any way gone against the process used by Angus Council, the education case substantiated by Education Scotland, nor anything else that Mr Smith keeps quoting in the hope that he will indoctrinate his views into the listing public.

    He explained: “What the Minister has said is he did not accept the survey report.

    “Angus Council will be asked on Thursday for this to go to judicial review because we are so confident that we have been honest, open and accountable that we are willing to let the courts decide.

    “If the officers have erred, which I do not believe they have, then we will deal with that. If not, then the Minister’s decision will be overturned.

    “If people believe in true scrutiny then surely they will support this honest and open approach.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Just noticed the implication too that if the Minister’s decision is not overturned then, as far as he is concerned, it will be because “the officers have erred”. Nothing to do with him, then.

      “If the officers have erred, which I do not believe they have, then we will deal with that. If not, then the Minister’s decision will be overturned.”

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Our other local paper has confrmed that the secret vote resulted in 16-13 for Judicial Review. It’s self-explanatory to work out who the first 15 are (will we ever be told?) but the 16th man (or woman) will have to be subject to a game of ‘guess who?’

    As this is now going to judicial review I will make this my last post and allow the courts to sort this out. My own feeling is it’s an incredible waste of time, flies smack in the face of public opinion and will only succeed in delaying to channel energies to properly improve the school estate while this runs its’ course. Who’s thinking of the children now?

    I’ll love you all and leave you. You may see me popping up with comments on other matters, but not this one.

    I’m sure our new friend Cougar (or Is that Simon?) will keep you all fully informed of developments in an accurate manner.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. If cllr Nield as he states in his statement to the Arbroath Herald wants to be honest, open and accountable why did he not allow the press & members of the public to attend yesterdays decision on the judicial review. There is nothing open & transparent about excluding people from a process that was already made public. Although I am aware this decision was not cllr Nields alone it was him & his partner(cllr Fairweather) in all things wrong with this process that pushed it forward. Yet again 3 out the 4 councillors responsible for representing the views of the west end of the town have let us down. I have no doubt they will however state that they have been representing the silent majority(what a cop out).
    Please note like Ewan this will be my last statement on this subject I however have to hope that the court decision will support what has been said by the Scottish Government.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. How soon is something like this likely to be heard? And what if there’s a change of administration ahead of that?

    In other words, once they’ve formally started the process with the court, can the Council change its mind?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. In these times of severe budget constraint, the Angus Councillors, of all parties have shown a total disregard for their constituents. I am non-political and the Alliance members, in particular, appear to be hell bent on indulging in a political witch hunt regardless of the financial consequences.
    Councillor Nield is noted for showing a total lack of decency, good manners and consideration to those people, council staff included, who do not concur with his more often than not extravagant proposals. We are paying the bills, including his remuneration from the public purse, and his behaviour certainly cannot be viewed as delivering value for money.
    Time to revert to the old Rate Payers Association type of representation – local councils should be about serving the community and not about political point scoring.
    The constituents can sort this out at the next election and Nield should be the first one to be ‘booted out’ – we simply can’t afford him and those like him.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. I was also one of the members of the public who was ‘ejected’ before the ‘secret meeting’. On 7 February I sent emails to Councillors expressing my concern about the fact that the public were to be excluded. The only reply from Councillor Nield was a standard ‘out of office’ reply.
    Councillor Myles replied with an email addressed (strangely) ‘To all concerned’.

    “Angus Alliance Councillors have been, and remain, committeed to debating the new school provision in Arbroath in public.It would allow us to scotch the ridiculous and misleading twisting of facts surrounding this case.However, the purpose of the report which is to be considered by the Council this Thursday is about the legal options available to the Council arising from the decision of Scottish Ministers to refuse consent to the closure of Muirfield and Timmegreens Primary Schools. Under local government law certain categories of information are exempt from publication and should be considered by the Council in private.”

    I sent another email to Councillor Myles asking him to explain why this specific matter had to be discussed in private. He replied but did not answer the question.I persisted and sent two further emails seeking an answer.

    When I arrived home, having been ‘ejected’ from the secret meeting I had recieved this reply from Councillor Myles dated 9 February (13:51):

    “I have just picked up your latest e-mails as I have had many meetings this past few days as you could imagine.

    I’m glad you are not speaking from a political point of view, as I have always said when it comes to operating at Local Council Level, National Political stances hinder rather than help the smooth running of a Council.

    This Council has been very open and transparent through all this process and it is the decision of the Cabinet Secretary that lacks transparency and could be questioned.

    How the council wishes to proceed be it legally or otherwise has to be decided in private.”

    What do you think?

    Still hasn’t answered the question….

    For me his statement “Angus Alliance Councillors have been, and remain, committed to debating the new school provision in Arbroath in public” to be at best ludicrous!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.