Comment posted Muirfield: a victory for right by Fiona McClymont.
This has made my day! Well done to Ewan Smith and the Muirfield action group for ensuring that the best decison has been reached for the children who attend Muirfield and Timmergreens Schools. Angus Council clearly forgot about what was really important here – the children.
It is now surely time that this incompetent and discourteous Director of Education is expelled from Angus Council?
Mr Logue – you can’t cover up THIS mistake!!!
Fiona McClymont also commented
- I am stunned to read in today’s Courier that Angus Councillors are holding Thursday’s meeting behind closed doors – barring menbers of the public. They have just been accused of a lack of transparency by the Scottish Government!!! They must surely be in line for the award for the most undemocratic local authority in the UK let alone Scotland.
Perhaps we can hope that the reason for this is that they will have a serious personnel issues to discuss in relation to this mess and that this prevents them from allowing the public to be present.
MAG/SRSN your honest campaigning deserves better treatment than this. Any Councillors with an ounce of decency will now surely be demanding a thorough, transparent and independent investigation of this scandal – if not then they should stand accused of bringing the council into disrepute!
- Re the Council meeting next Thursday that appears to be in the mode of ‘Carry on Regardless’. Have been looking over past Courier reports about the ‘process’ on line.
6 months ago (report 16/08/11)some Councillors had approached CEO, Richard Stiff with concerns and proposed an ‘investigation’ about what was going wrong. At that stage it was being referred to as ‘Angus Council’s Watergate Scandal’.
Perhaps there will be enough Councillors in attendance on 9/2/11 who have really given thought to what has happened so far. Angus Council has been brought into disrepute – perhaps they will have the gumption to demand the investigation some sought last year.
Given the fact that the Scottish Government has now made an official judgement against the proposal – it is vital that the authority takes time to examine why this ‘project’ has failed. Surely they must call the Director of Education to account before trying to advance a flawed proposal against democratic opposition? They have already been accused of not being ‘transparent’ in respect of how Council business has been conducted. It is time to clean up their act.
Apart from the main issue here – this is costing everyone in Angus money at a time of ‘financial restraint’. Not only does it appear that the Council’s desire is to flog a ‘dead donkey’- if they persist with this project they are expecting Angus council tax payers to continue to pay for the ‘administration’ of the flogging!
Certainly to proceed without an investigation would demonstrate a complete disregard of this ‘dirty’ situation. This flawed project has already caused disruption and distress to the people affected by their ‘proposal’.
Will the meeting be held in Council Chamber in centre of Forfar or the Council’s ‘fortress’ (Angus House) in the middle of nowhere?
I am concerned that although a major battle has been won the war is not yet over.
- I too have been very disappointed by the manner in which The Courier has reported on the ‘good news story’ of the Muirfield Action Group’s success. This follows their report following Neil Logue’s letter of 13 January to the Scottish Government.
(In that letter,that was also published on Angus Council’s web site, Mr Logue did not confine himself to making comment on the salient issues. It was astonishing that Council employee had been allowed to make comment on the actions that a named member of the public was taking to raising objection to a council proposal on the Council’s web site).
Unprofessional and undemocratic. I hope that someone at Angus House addresses this issue – Ewan Smith deserves an apology.
Ewan Smith had no right of reply on the Angus Council website. It seemed unfair to me that the Courier article about Angus Council’s letter gave Mr Logue yet another opportunity to publically voice his personal opinions about an irrelevant matter; how the action group had decided to conduct their campaign.
I have only recently started to follow this story on ForArgyll – thank you for the excellent coverage!
Recent comments by Fiona McClymont
- Social media has its limits: Angus Council Leader loses it in public following loss of Ewan Smith
I too live in Angus. Not sure what you can find to stand up for people who have no idea of fairness, honesty and accountability. This is a Council that can uphold a formal grievance that senior education officials did not follow Angus Council policy to investigate the Council’s own failures to provide services to chilidren reported to be at risk of harm. The elected members did not then demand an investigation. I have been seeking an investigation of those complaints since 2008 – Stuart Hosie MP has been trying since 2011 – to obtain an explanation for this unacceptable situation. Guess what they keep avoiding the issue.
- Seconder for Councillor Ewan Smith’s referral of Arbroath primary school estate decision to full Angus Council
Ewan Smith is the only person on Angus Council who has presented an informed and intelligent proposal to the people of Angus. However, we have been denied all opportunity to benefit from his input. We have a Council Leader (Iain Gaul) who uses Facebook to make what has been described in the Courier as a ‘Foul Mouthed Rant’ attacking other Councillors. See http://www.facebook.com/pages/Councillor-Iain-Gaul/433761449989181 He does this while claiming that ‘Team Angus’ (his actual words) are working for the betterment of Angus! Angus Council has to be the most undemocratic local authority in the UK: they have what Iain Gaul has described as a ‘new & improved’Scrutiny & Audit’Committee who voted NOT to ‘scrutinise why Angus Council Officials previous proposals had to be called in by the Scottish Government. The Scottish Government criticised Angus Council because the proposals were not ‘fully transparent’ and were not ‘wholly accurate’. The people of Angus paid for that incompetent ‘proposal’ but Angus Council have decided not to find out what went wrong. Instead, they have given Council Officials another bite at the cherry and have excluded Councillor Smith from that process. The Director of Education, Neil Logue vigorously progressed the proposal that was described by Angus Council’s ‘Leader’ as ‘flawed’. Neil Logue leaves angus Council at the end of the month with an early retirement package that includes a generous ‘golden handshake’. The people of Angus will just have to trust that this time round he has not been progressing plans that are ‘not wholly accurate’- the fact that Councillor Smith’s question could not be answered does not bode well…. Never mind if these proposals (arranged at meetings attended by the non elected Mr Logue but excluding the elected Councillor Smith) hit the fan – Mr Logue will no longer be involved or indeed accountable.
- Councillor Ewan Smith does battle alone at Angus education meeting
I would also like to know what Mr Russell’s views are on how the SNP controlled Angus Council responded to the fact that the Scottish Government rejected the Angus Council proposals made last year. The SNP controlled parliament rejected those proposals on the grounds that they were not ‘fully transparent’ and that they were not ‘wholly accurate. The people of Angus paid for those proposals to be made, even although they had already rejected them. Employees (and possibly elected members) at Angus Council were responsible for the reasons that the Scottish Government severely criticised the rejected plans. Senior Council Officials are well paid in Angus but failed to deliver a competent proposal. After the local election when the SNP gained control of Angus. I complained to all members of the newly formed Angus Council that it was not acceptable for Angus Council to have made such a mess of the proposal that the Scottish Government was forced to reject. Councillor Gaul (SNP), Leader of the Council replied. He replied using the word ‘flawed’ three times to describe the proposals. He said that Angus Council’s ‘new and improved’ Scrutiny & Audit Committee would consider the matter as a ‘priority’. The Committee voted NOT to ‘scrutinise’ why the Council had been so severely criticised by the Scottish Government or to explain to the people of Angus why/how public money had been wasted on what the Leader of the Council himself called (3X in one email) a ‘flawed’ project! It is sickening that the SNP should have used the ‘Arbroath Schools Issue’ to gain control by clearly supporting Ewan Smith’s campaign against this specific proposal and then to ignore why this mess was allowed to be progressed by non elected Council Officials. The SNP Group in Angus are concealing serious issues that concern the honesty, transparency and competence of Senior Council Officials by failing to investigate or scrutinise their conduct. The SNP have lost any respect or trust I had for this party – they have also lost my vote.
- Schools campaigner, Councillor Ewan Smith quits Angus Council SNP group and administration to go independent
The Director of Education, Neil Logue used the Angus Council web site to publish his personal opinions about Ewan Smith’s opposition to the proposals. This was before Ewan was elected as a councillor. Logue’s letter to the Scottish Government complained that Ewan had been uncooperative by refusing to attend meetings ‘behind closed doors’. The proposals were rejected – lack of transparency on the part of the Council was one reason cited. The people in Angus are now expected, by the SNP ‘controlled’ council, to accept that Councillor Smith,Education Vice- Convenor and the Councillor repesenting the a ward that will be directly affected by proposals, can be excluded from Council meetings! This sums up what democracy means in Angus – is any wonder the turn out at local elections is so poor? I feel very badly let down by the Angus SNP group, not simply because they have become turncoats but because they are behaving in such an underhand and undemocratic manner. I was a supporter of Scottish Independence but this whole issue is making me reconsider that position; I will never trust the SNP again.
- Martha Payne and NeverSeconds hit fund raising target: new kitchen for Mary’s Meals
The poor dinner ladies are frontline workers. Someone much higher up the ‘food chain’(sorry)in the Council will sit in an office and be paid a promoted salary to ‘manage’ what the dinner ladies are able to provide. It is that person (possibly even persons) who is responsible for goes on prison trays in schools. It is their responsibility to ensure that dinner ladies have good quality ingredients, cooking equipment,facilities and training to produce good food.
If there is a problem in doing this then it is THEIR responsibility to convey that to elected members so that THEY can address issues.
Is the whole photograph debacle really down to the actions of a paid council official?
Time for some clarity (not just in A&B but across Scotland)about who does what within a local authority. Councillors have been elected to make policies. Officials are paid to implement them.
Lines have become blurred and no one is ever held accountable for their area of responsibility. Especially when it all hits the fan.
The current system failures are mocking democracy.
powered by SEO Super Comments