Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

Comment posted Quarrying at Glensanda: aggregating aggregates by newsroom.

Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – apart from the pleasure of actually meeting.

Recent comments by newsroom

  • Astonishing infrastructural deficiency threatens Oban’s business development
    If any of us had other people’s money to spend, surely we could run an event and a street party?
    Your sense that this is evidence of an OK performance highlights the rock-bottom expectations Argyll now has of its council.
  • Astonishing infrastructural deficiency threatens Oban’s business development
    Your first remarks would discourage amy business developent whatsoever – which we’re sure is not your intention.
    Any 21st century entrepreneur is entitled to expect that the infrastructural provision of major towns is automatically business capable.
    We have never described the previous Executive Director responsible for Infrastructure and Economic Development as a star performer but at least he knew the field – a ‘square one’ necessity. Now the council has chosen not even to have level of competence available.
  • NHS Highland attempts heist on Campbeltown’s volunteer kidney support group
    We have some problems with the comment above.
    The first is an arguably unintended but careless smear on Councillor Kelly and on Jamie McGrigor MSP in saying: ‘councillor Kelly and Mr McGrigor hijacking a very positive cause for their own personal political gain’.
    Unless ‘personal gain’ is qualified as ‘personal political gain’, the immediate reading of such a comment is that money is involved.
    Beyond that, we stand to be corrected – but we find it unlikely that any community could be in a position to guarantee to raise funds allocated to issues over which it has no control and is not necessarily consulted upon – without question and at the dictat of an organisation which is not answerable to them.
    If this was a contract, it would be different, There would be accountability to those who pay the bills.
    This sort of confusion need not arise if relationships and responsibilities are clearly framed and agreed at the outset.
    The main issue here is the credit to the community in Campbeltown and to people like yourself who have donated to this very worthwhile alleviation of additional stress on people already suffering from a serious illness.
    We don’t know a lot about Councillor Kelly’s work in South Kintyre although we notice his involvement in a lot of community causes and projects, indicating a widespread engagement with community development; but we do know a lot about Jamie McGrigor’s work across the Highlands and Islands and anyone further from the caricature of ‘posturing politician’ would be very hard to find.
    Whatever his party, he is someone who is – unusually – unvaryingly focused on issues he knows to be important for his regional constituents. He also never routinely runs down other political parties or those who represent them when he disagrees with their policies or actions. That is unique in our experience and a welcome breath of fresh air.
  • Substantial community benefits from the big estates
    The pier’s privately owned by the same outfit that owns the wreck of the Inn across the water at St Catherines.
    The – once lovely – Inveraray Pier is one hostile community buy out – for nothing – everyone would unquestioningly support.
  • Syriza, one seat short of overall majority, now talisman for the Scot Nats
    Could not agree more.
    Of course there is no effective Greek recovery. Mr McWhirter though, rightly identified the fact that – below the massive interest burden on the massive debt burden – the Greek economy grew [from a very low base] by what is now almost 4%. He did, foolishly – go on to compare that growth favourably with Britain’s. That’s the problem with polemic.
    As you say,there is no escape from austerity for Greece. It just depends on the specific source of that austerity, formal or informal, with the spectre you raise of it becoming worse in the chaotic collapse of an exit from Europe.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

8 Responses to Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

  1. My understanding is that the ship’s conveyor boom is only used when discharging. At that time, the cargo is dropped through the hopper doors in the bottom of the holds, onto longitudinal conveyors which take the cargo to the foot of the vertical conveyor (in the un-lovely tower attached to the front of the superstructure). The vertical conveyor then dumps the cargo onto the start of the ship’s discharge conveyor belt, carried in the boom which is swung from the ship above the quay at Amsterdam, or Hamburg, or wherever.

    My understanding is that, when loading, the quarry’s own conveyer boom carries the stone chips right above the top of the hold, so that gravity does all of the rest (until the destination port), and the ship’s conveyor boom is simply swung out of the way.

    If the ship’s conveyor belt carried the new cargo on-board, you would then need some horizontal conveyors at deck level to get the cargo from the inboard end of that conveyor to the tops of the holds. That would seem to be a bigger change than has been implemented in this rebuild.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. The ship loader is actually on the jetty. It is a very interesting piece of equipment, more elaborate than I had imagined. From what I could see and from what I gleaned from the quarry staff I will try and explain how it works, but I did not get to see how the conveyor collects the stone or how the belt deals with it’s outward travel.

    If you look at the two pictures in this article you will see that it’s base is a massive bridge structure that sits on a turntable/pivot at one end and travels in an arc on rails set into the jetty at the outer end, where you can see a driver’s cab is attached. The conveyor to the ship is set in a boom that travels outwards on top of this bridge. It looks like the back end is held down by rollers that will be below the bridge. The boom conveyor can reach the furthest away corner of any of the ships holds.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Would make a good set for the next James Bond movie, but ideally the baddies would disappear into the mincing machine and that would be best achieved as the ship is unloaded and the cargo sinks into the hoppers at the base of the hold.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. I have no objection to the Glensanda operation whatsoever but . . .

    let no one tell you that heavy industry does not do cute

    compellingly beautiful symmetrical heap of silver crushed stone

    the very specific beauty that is part of industry

    Am I the only one who finds this eulogy to the industrialisation and total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside a bit odd after the vitriol recently poured on the wind industry?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Surely the difference with the wind industry is that it’s creeping over the surface of the country – and the surrounding seas – like some contagion that risks getting out of control, whereas Glensanda is an admittedly very large scale operation but in a carefully chosen area of a landscape big enough to contain it. Yes, it can be surprisingly visible – for example from the road through Glen Nant, 20 miles away – but it’s surely not the ‘total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside’, and it does have a certain grandeur in its sheer scale.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Digging a mountain away in an operation like that is pretty close to total destruction, is it not?

        It may be necessary, it may be in the most appropriate place and it may be very clever technically, but Glensanda is not ‘beautiful’ by any stretch of the imagination.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • I suppose it depends on the imagination being stretched. Some only see natural beauty while others see beauty in man’s industrial efforts to improve his lifestyle.

          To live the lives we desire we sometimes need to move mountains, cut down trees and extract energy. It’s what we do to make good the impact and generate re-growth that is important.

          The owners and the staff at Glensanda seem to consider the environmental impact of their every action and look to have it in mind at every stage. Vegetation is evident on the “benches” left from the earlier works.

          Fifty years ago when there was a lot of road building, there were small quarries dotted along the roadsides. Today most of these are hardly noticable due to government spending on tidying up schemes, modern machinery and the healing efforts of Mother Nature.

          We can look at the ground around Glensanda and see evidence of the toil of the people who lived there before the Clearances. In the future other generations will see evidence of the toil of today’s people.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.