Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

Comment posted Quarrying at Glensanda: aggregating aggregates by newsroom.

Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – apart from the pleasure of actually meeting.

Recent comments by newsroom

  • Labour go for Murphy and Dugdale – now for the political Himalayas
    Jim Mather’s the benchmark.
    Where are we with cloning technology these days?
  • Labour go for Murphy and Dugdale – now for the political Himalayas
    We have a lot of time for John Swinney. He s a very safe pair of hands with the budget – and let’s not pretend that he didn’t put aside the funds to support a breathtaking and endless series of givewaways in the 12 months before the indeyref vote.
    We lost a bit of respect for him – although we could understand the pressure – when, in the heat of the indyref campaign, he gave some assurances he knew well to be unsound.
    People like John Swinney ARE the gold standard; ARE their integrity – and ought never to put it at risk for any ends.
    He is also a fundamentally decent man with a stable set of objective values. Anyone, everyone, has to honour him for, alone amongst the top echelons of the SNP – going to the service of reconciliation at St Giles after the indyref vote.
    He understands the nature and the mechanics of what he does and kt was people’s impeccably sound judgment of his capability and trustworthiness that was the ground anchor for the indy campaign each time it hit a wobble. [He should work not to whinge, though. Hearing him go through the ritual mantras of whingeing at Westminster is uncomfortable because it is unworthy and beneath him.]
    What we were saying though is that what it takes to conceive of a strategic economic development plan for a country is a challenge at another level.
    There is no politician in the UK, of any party and at any level of any government who has this capacity. It is perhaps rarer that it might be but rare it it; and it is not diminishing of John Swinney to say that this is not a level to which his skill set naturally leads.
  • An unexpected pairing to email in Day 8′s Save Castle Toward Advent Calendar
    The information architecture on the Argyll and Bute Council website is devoid of architectural understanding – and of the operational principles of simple usage. We share your frustrations on a regular basis.
  • An unexpected pairing to email in Day 8′s Save Castle Toward Advent Calendar
    Thank you.
    We have a worry about a democratic deficit in this sort of thing where, as here, the matter of the disposal of a publicly owned asset surely has to be of interest and responsibility to all elected representatives – regardless of their individual perspectives.
    The way the British political system is supposed to work is that energetic debate engaged from all sides of an issue is the best chance of getting all aspects of it opened up and made part of the fabric of final consideration.
    It is only ever those who have a specific intended outcome in mind – rather than the ‘right’ outcome which emerges form an open process – who fear this sort of democratic engagement.
  • An unexpected pairing to email in Day 8′s Save Castle Toward Advent Calendar
    Perhaps the SCCDC were drawing attention to the fact that this issue appears to be being diverted away from the full council where, as experienced councillors, both you and Councillor McQueen would have had views on it?
    Will it come back to the full council at some point, after its November diversion to the Policy and Resources Committee?

powered by SEO Super Comments

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Print

8 Responses to Am I glad you were there, Murdoch – …

  1. My understanding is that the ship’s conveyor boom is only used when discharging. At that time, the cargo is dropped through the hopper doors in the bottom of the holds, onto longitudinal conveyors which take the cargo to the foot of the vertical conveyor (in the un-lovely tower attached to the front of the superstructure). The vertical conveyor then dumps the cargo onto the start of the ship’s discharge conveyor belt, carried in the boom which is swung from the ship above the quay at Amsterdam, or Hamburg, or wherever.

    My understanding is that, when loading, the quarry’s own conveyer boom carries the stone chips right above the top of the hold, so that gravity does all of the rest (until the destination port), and the ship’s conveyor boom is simply swung out of the way.

    If the ship’s conveyor belt carried the new cargo on-board, you would then need some horizontal conveyors at deck level to get the cargo from the inboard end of that conveyor to the tops of the holds. That would seem to be a bigger change than has been implemented in this rebuild.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. The ship loader is actually on the jetty. It is a very interesting piece of equipment, more elaborate than I had imagined. From what I could see and from what I gleaned from the quarry staff I will try and explain how it works, but I did not get to see how the conveyor collects the stone or how the belt deals with it’s outward travel.

    If you look at the two pictures in this article you will see that it’s base is a massive bridge structure that sits on a turntable/pivot at one end and travels in an arc on rails set into the jetty at the outer end, where you can see a driver’s cab is attached. The conveyor to the ship is set in a boom that travels outwards on top of this bridge. It looks like the back end is held down by rollers that will be below the bridge. The boom conveyor can reach the furthest away corner of any of the ships holds.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Would make a good set for the next James Bond movie, but ideally the baddies would disappear into the mincing machine and that would be best achieved as the ship is unloaded and the cargo sinks into the hoppers at the base of the hold.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. I have no objection to the Glensanda operation whatsoever but . . .

    let no one tell you that heavy industry does not do cute

    compellingly beautiful symmetrical heap of silver crushed stone

    the very specific beauty that is part of industry

    Am I the only one who finds this eulogy to the industrialisation and total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside a bit odd after the vitriol recently poured on the wind industry?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Surely the difference with the wind industry is that it’s creeping over the surface of the country – and the surrounding seas – like some contagion that risks getting out of control, whereas Glensanda is an admittedly very large scale operation but in a carefully chosen area of a landscape big enough to contain it. Yes, it can be surprisingly visible – for example from the road through Glen Nant, 20 miles away – but it’s surely not the ‘total destruction of a huge swathe of countryside’, and it does have a certain grandeur in its sheer scale.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Digging a mountain away in an operation like that is pretty close to total destruction, is it not?

        It may be necessary, it may be in the most appropriate place and it may be very clever technically, but Glensanda is not ‘beautiful’ by any stretch of the imagination.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • I suppose it depends on the imagination being stretched. Some only see natural beauty while others see beauty in man’s industrial efforts to improve his lifestyle.

          To live the lives we desire we sometimes need to move mountains, cut down trees and extract energy. It’s what we do to make good the impact and generate re-growth that is important.

          The owners and the staff at Glensanda seem to consider the environmental impact of their every action and look to have it in mind at every stage. Vegetation is evident on the “benches” left from the earlier works.

          Fifty years ago when there was a lot of road building, there were small quarries dotted along the roadsides. Today most of these are hardly noticable due to government spending on tidying up schemes, modern machinery and the healing efforts of Mother Nature.

          We can look at the ground around Glensanda and see evidence of the toil of the people who lived there before the Clearances. In the future other generations will see evidence of the toil of today’s people.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

All the latest comments (including yours) straight to your mailbox, everyday! Click here to subscribe.