Comment posted Council statement on press staff suspensions and more leaked information by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll.
I agree with that. Not just due to the possibility of compromising or prejudicing the case but also because of the right and proper concept of ‘innocent till proven guilty.’ The release of any details prior to a full review being completed can only lead to speculation and mud possibly sticking where none is due.
The more important question just now is why the investigation into the original Spygate issue seems to be dragging its feet for so long. The external ‘examiner’ was appointed a long time ago now and I would be willing to wager that the total time he charges to the Council for his review will be less than two FTE working weeks.
I wonder if the elections might be considered as a ‘good time to bury bad news’
Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll also commented
- As we don’t know the exact details of the alleged joke we can’t comment on the specifics of this case, or speculate on whether it is an excessive reaction or not.
However what I would say is that two A&B employees use e-mail to make a joke about a high ranking officer and they get suspended. An Executive Director uses e-mail to lie to a Councillor and he gets to meet the Princess Royal.
As is sang in ‘Get a Blooming’ Move On’ ‘This is the self-preservation society’
Recent comments by Integrity? Not in the ConDemAll
- First Minister’s choice not to condemn mob behaviour proves Farage point
Not sure if I agree with putting fascism and Islam on the same shelf (as it were).
However interestingly, and a little ironically, if there is a massively generalised criticism of the Islamic faith it is its traditional resistance/opposition to multiculturalism – a criticism that could be made of UKIP with little difficulty. - Walsh to lead all but Lib Dems, Conservatives and George Freeman
‘more honest and upfront’Really?
- First Minister’s choice not to condemn mob behaviour proves Farage point
On the issue of accusing people of being fascists I, in a rare moment, agree with Malcolm due to the people in history who have, through their actions, defined the term (although its proper definition has doens’t necessarily mean you need to be a mass murderer).It is a little bit of double standards though because in another post you refer to Farage as ‘good old’ yet he descibed the protesters as ‘fascist thugs.’ So an offensive remark by him in your eyes Malcolm?
- First Minister’s choice not to condemn mob behaviour proves Farage point
Using violence against it is obviously contradictory however it is often the action of very last resort. It is a good line by Arden although worth putting it in the context of the play it comes from which focuses on military deserters who are sickened by a war they are being forced to be a part of. Apartheid and the America civil rights movement is a very different context where years of suppression, violence, and some of the most heinous acts were committed on people for no other reason than bitter inbred prejudice. - First Minister’s choice not to condemn mob behaviour proves Farage point
The NIMBY, of all political persuasion, certainly isn’t a rare bird however their existence in place A, or of persuasion B, doesn’t detract from criticism of specific examples of it.I agree it is unsafe to use fringe views to represent a whole group and you make a fair point about the need for clarity in the overall ‘cause’. For me though, UKIP cause it not clear and I don’t see these issues as the views of a minority within the group, or a collection of rogue members.
Your point about Alex Salmond’s potential reaction to similar treatment of one of his own party (or himself) is valid and is a point I made in an earlier post. At the risk of repeating myself (well not a risk as I am doing it!) I believe the best course of action would have been for him to openly state that he didn’t approve of the actions of the crowd and, in the same statement, making it clear that the group was not representing either the SNP or the Scottish independence movement.I am sure he, as any of us would, be shaken by such an experience. The fact that there was no actual physical violence doesn’t for a second mean anger/abuse at such close proximity is not hugely intimidating and a politician, irrespective of opinion, should be allowed to perform their role without being out in a position where they are fearful for their safety. Tony Blair would, almost definitely, face a similar reaction in certain places, as would a number of other politicians over the years. Like you I would argue that this is not the best way to express discontent. Only in a very small number of occasions would I condone taking protest to the point of physical intimidation and I reserve that to some of the most significant ‘upheavals’ in modern times (examples being the fight against apartheid and the civil rights movement in the US) – even then there would be a line I, personally, couldn’t step over.
Drifting away from the point a little (although I must say it is refreshing to be debating something other than Scottish Independence or A&B Council!). My overall point is that I believe UKIP to be a party with an inherent bigotry at the core of it and this is clearly evidenced by the actions, statements, and affiliations of too many of its members for it to be brushed off as a the actions of a fringe minority. If the same number of statements (of the same nature) had been made by members of any of the mainstream parties (on both sides of the border) then they would face a far bigger backlash from the media and opposition supporters despite the actual percentage representation being far lower.
powered by SEO Super Comments
If anyone in a senior position in an organisation lets a bruised ego get in the way of sensible management, and vindictiveness takes over, it’s the senior that should go; I saw a very good office manager hugely embarrassed when a juvenile email was seen by the director she was making fun of. The director was hurt by the remarks, but the dust settled and no lasting harm was done. The event at Kilmory may well be just the latest case of vindictive treatment of staff for minor – if stupid – misdemeanours.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Newsroom – do you know if the funnies were about the executive management as a group or were they about particular individuals in the executive?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Can we look forward to FA (or indeed the OT) putting in a FoI request for us to see these comments? They are definitely in the public interest as we could all do with a laugh after the last Westminster budget!
I agree with Robert, senior management need to have thick skins and turn a blind eye to the disrespectful banter of their juniors. Anything else just makes them look stupid, vindictive and rather too full of themselves.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
As we don’t know the exact details of the alleged joke we can’t comment on the specifics of this case, or speculate on whether it is an excessive reaction or not.
However what I would say is that two A&B employees use e-mail to make a joke about a high ranking officer and they get suspended. An Executive Director uses e-mail to lie to a Councillor and he gets to meet the Princess Royal.
As is sang in ‘Get a Blooming’ Move On’ ‘This is the self-preservation society’
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Whilst we cannot know the exact situations that led to the suspensions and while we must bear in mind that suspension can be part of a disciplinary process and not the end, we are surely entitled to query whether there is any effective leadership of council staff. To have one staff member suspended over one issue might be unfortunate but to have 3 staff suspended over two different matters would appear to suggest a real lack of leadership and control.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
It seems premature to comment on whether the suspensions are excessive or not – the council has to follow its own procedure for each and every issue that crops up on its own merits. If the accusations are serious enough then they should of course by suspended, and we do not yet know the entire extent of the accusations.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
And therein lies the problem Dr McCoy… the complete lack of transparency within this council and in particular this investigation.
Will we actually ever get the answers or is the delay in replying to FOIs on this matter and the length of time the investigation is taking all to give Sally bin Loudon time to cover up the damning evidence.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If the investigation is still ongoing, common sense dictates that the council can’t give out details for fear of compromising or prejudicing it. All this talk of conspiracy is only fit for the tinfoil hat brigade.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I agree with that. Not just due to the possibility of compromising or prejudicing the case but also because of the right and proper concept of ‘innocent till proven guilty.’ The release of any details prior to a full review being completed can only lead to speculation and mud possibly sticking where none is due.
The more important question just now is why the investigation into the original Spygate issue seems to be dragging its feet for so long. The external ‘examiner’ was appointed a long time ago now and I would be willing to wager that the total time he charges to the Council for his review will be less than two FTE working weeks.
I wonder if the elections might be considered as a ‘good time to bury bad news’
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Dr L McCoy – ‘All this talk of conspiracy is only fit for the tinfoil hat brigade.’ An interesting comment.
Of course, you were quite right in your first post, they do have to follow their own procedures and if Council Officers operated in a fair and just manner your comment would be very appropriate. Unfortunately in ABC, adherance and intepretation of the respective policies is strictly dependant on who and how they are applied.
Small example – in difficult times you would hope that organisations would have in place policies aimed at keeping staff up-to-date with developments, which would offer staff the reassurance that everything was being done to minimse job losses etc. And to it’s credit, ABC has such a policy.
For the past two or more years staff in the Council have been living in fear and uncertainty about their jobs. Has senior management recognised these fears and anxieties? Oh yes, they’ve unquestionably noticed the fear and anxiety in the staff. Has the policy on keeping staff up-to-date with developments been followed? Nope. Have they offered staff reassurance whenever they could???
IF we assume there is some merit in this story, as reported in several different media sources, and if we assumed Senior Managers were being consistent in their application of policies, they would need to suspend the majority of their current workforce. Staff who were fearful for their jobs before will be absolutely terrified now. Or do you think this is maybe the message they were hoping to give out?
In relation to the the on-going investgation on ‘spying’, people have every right to ask questions, not about particular details which may compromise or prejudice either parties involved, but to ask questions about what on earth is going on at ABC.
There is a public interest factor in this case, a member of the Council’s staff has apparently openly acknowledged they set-up false accounts to ‘spy’ on members of the public who they percieved were involved in possible subservise activities against the Council. In other words they were possibly spying on parents during the schools closure programme. Now two further members of staff from the same department have apparently either resigned and/or been suspended.
Of course people are going to ask questions and rightly so.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
So two members of staff are suspended and the predictable, nay automatic, reaction from the infestation of snp apparatchiks on here is the Council is at fault! And this is based on Newise’s sensational “we have learned”.
‘We have learned’ is of course the new “we understand” – a term now largely discarded by Newsie following ‘exclusives’ like “we understand the Dunoon Observer is going bust….”
Sheer speculation and utter tosh of cooiurse – but that doesn’t stop the slabbering sycophants attaching their coat tails to Newsie nonsense and telling us again what a dreadful Council this is.
Grow up.
What to see a poor Council? Take a look at SNP controlled Edinburgh City Council. Allegations of a £1.5 million fraud and so far 18 Council staff suspended…
Have a nice day.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Last time I looked, the Lib Dems were the largest party in Edinburgh and are the senior partners in coalition with the SNP (the Lib Dems have both the Provost and Council leader positions). Edinburgh certainly does have problems and those being suspended or sacked are being pursued for crimes rather more serious than laissez majeste.
However, it would be churlish to let the facts stand in the way of a good old fashioned anti-Nat rant from the “Simon”!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon -why does he hide?- correctly identifies that Edinburgh Council have considerable difficulties although some of those have been imposed by exterior influences-the tram project being a good example. It will be interesting to see which parties come out on top there in May.The SNP are the junior partner in this administration and Simon must know that, if he is anywhere as bright as he thinks he is.
Why does he think it acceptable to cite “alleged” offences about unspecified individuals and yet take exception to unsourced reports from FA?
I’ll get back to my slabbering now but it certainly makes a mess on the keyboard.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Simon: I’m sometimes entertained by the abrasive tone of your comments, but what sort of sycophant is a slabbering one? Since a is nowhere near o on the keyboard, I’m concerned that it’s not a typo and there’s something I don’t know.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Robert: It’s Scots for dribbling at the mouth. So “Simon” is right on that at least.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FOI requests? For goodness sake, get a grip, next you’ll be wanting to tap in to Council staff’s conversation on the phone and heaven forbid when they chat in their office, tearoom or toilet!
If, there was dialogue as it suggests, then the staff involved should have had their wrists slapped. That’s good management. Seems management in the Council are keen to switch the spotlight to the poor cooncil staff when they should be looking on their own doorstep first!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Doc” it’s sad. You used to be much more objective and in fact I can remember you castigating Newsie for one of her frivilous (ie sheer conjecture) reports about the community council in Connel being too afraid of supposed Council repercussions to be actually quoted (three days before the Oban Times carried the full story quotes names and all) “hearsay” you described it as.
Sad then that you’ve just swallowed Newsie’s ‘story’ hook, line and plonker…..
Election time must be approaching….
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Not sure, “Simon” where you think I am demonstrating a lack of objectivity in my above posts. I haven’t commented on the story directly except to call for us all to see the alleged remarks as they might bring a smile to our faces. I have no idea about the veracity of Newsroom’s information and will save any heavy weight criticism until the truth outs (or what we mere mortals are allowed to see of it) before commenting further on the hapless press officers.
I thank you for highlighting the fact that I previously picked Newsroom up on the definition of hearsay Again, I have no idea if this current story is hearsay or not as Newsroom has not revealed her source for the story. If it comes from any of the affected parties then it would not be hearsay. If it comes from a third party then it is hearsay. However, understand “Simon”, the fact that something is hearsay doesn’t make it false; it merely means that it cannot be used in evidence in a court.
No apology from you over your attempt to mislead with your comments about Edinburgh Council being controlled by the SNP then?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hmmmm, this story seems to be a good bit more solidly evidenced than you suggest though Simon. There’s even the “official” statement from Sally bin Loudon on the website, the story in the OT this week.
Truth is that gossip will be flowing out of the council about this and it will actually be harder not to hear about it.
The unsubstantated arguments you like to sling at newsie aren’t appropriate in this case.
Allegedly
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
looks like this kind of thing is going viral……
http://in.news.yahoo.com/sonar-bangle-211405882.html
cracking jokes about the memsahib is a jolly not on your nellie no-no
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well Newsie, after your “While they were working at some point, the two staff concerned were evidently exchanging some private jokes about executive staff – not scurrilous in any way but funny/silly – as you do.” the Oban Times is today quoting the Council “the decision to suspend was founded on strong evidence of potential serious and gross mis-conduct around wholly inappropriate and repetitive use of obscene and abusive communication messaging exchanges, deemed to be harsh and hurtful if read by the colleagues – mostly junior – being discussed. Not joke sharing about senior colleagues or anything close to it”.
Beaten to the punch again by the OT – and certainly “obscene and abusive does not fit your description of “‘third form’ private jollity ” – will you now withdraw your comments?
Will the posters above who queued up to rant again, about the Council no apologise??
I ain’t holding my breath….
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Crazy ” [Simon] The unsubstantated arguments you like to sling at newsie aren’t appropriate in this case.” – Oh Yeah???
Have a nice evening
Like or Dislike:
0 
0