In yet another example of Argyll and the Islands stirring with ambition, the Isle of Luing Community Trust has submitted a planning application to build an Atlantic Islands Centre in Cullipool.
This proposal was floated last year at the hugely successful Atlantic Islands festival held on the island in association with the Scottish Centre for Geopoetics which is based there.
Those supporting – and objecting to – the proposal have until this Friday (23rd July) for their comments to be received. Supporters must make their voices heard. Objectors always do. The planners need an accurate picture of community perspectives.
The challenge of renewal
Communities – individuals too – who do not renew themselves are self-condemned to progressive decline. The challenge of life itself is renewal, as that is its very process.
The Isle of Lismore in Loch Linnhe, north from Luing and its fellow Slate islands, was in this position a few years ago. A plan to build a new heritage centre with a bistro cafe, beside the old museum was founded on strong local support but drew persistent objections.
The centre was given planning consent. Its design, at once traditional and – today – innovative with its grass roof, sits comfortably in the landscape. A large outdoor deck, an extension of the bistro-cafe, makes outdoor socialising a communal pleasure in decent weather in the stunning landscape.
The St Moluag’s Centre supports residents, community groups and visitors alike. It provides contemporary facilities in an attractive, damp-proof, well insulated building. It has been a noted success for life on Lismore, with young folk confidently staffing the cafe and visitors given a sense of belonging for the time being.
This building won the inaugural Argyll and Bute 2009 Sustainable Design Award for public buildings – not only because of its quality but because of the insistent campaign on its behalf by its own community. That speaks for its acceptance and its perceived value.
Yet this building came from the same position as the proposed Atlantic Islands Centre now occupies – supported and attracting objections, many vigorous.
In Lismore, one focus of these was the assumption that a new centre would impact negatively on the existing village hall. This has not been the case. The new centre has added greatly to the island’s resources – for itself and for its visitors; and what had already existed continues to fulfill a vital function in the community.
There is every reason why Luing’s proposal should be every bit as successful and the two have much in common, including their architect.
Luing is a working island and a go ahead one. Many of those at the heart of the Atlantic Islands Centre proposal are involved with the Luing History Group and with strengthening the creative heart of the island. These are the last people to be insensitive to the nature and needs of the island.
What may well separate them from the objectors is that they are demonstrably willing to expend effort, time and expertise on making a contribution to the vital renewal of their island home.
Submit responses to be received by 23rd July
The application is on Argyll and Bute Council’s website.
If you click on View Associated Documents (at the foot of the screen) you can open the Design / Access Statement and the architect’s plans etc at the bottom of the list and see what is proposed.
Call to support the Community Trust’s initiative
The Community Trust sees this building being of great potential benefit to the people of Luing and its visitors and is asking for comments in support of this application (Ref: 10/01059/PP) to be submitted:
- online at the above Council website address or
- by letter to: Ms Fiona Scott, Planning Officer, Argyll & Bute Council, Planning and Regulatory Services, Lorn House, Albany Street, Oban, PA34 4AR.
Note: All comments must be received before Friday 23rd July 2010.
The Trust is asking those interested to pay particular attention to the planning issues that most concern the Council:
- Appearance (design, materials etc)
- Traffic, parking and access
- Residential amenity (noise levels etc)
- Impact on natural or built environment – e.g. benefit to natural heritage by raising awareness of bird and plant life in the area
It is legitimate for anyone to submit their comments, but if you have been to Luing please mention this and give your views as to how this Centre will enhance life on the island for residents and visitors. There are currently 8 objections and only 3 support letters listed.This is the usual pattern, with people motivated more strongly in objection than in support – but it gives a skewed picture.
For Argyll’s view is that objection and support should only be taken into account by the planners where it comes from full-time residents on Luing. These are the lives centrally affected by any change. Residents of all views and interests should talk to each other about it rather than become factionalised and rather than have a decision swayed by people who visit; by second homers; and by those who now live elsewhere.
But if it is legitimate for comments of either kind to be submitted even by people who have never been to Luing, then it is vital the the positives outweigh the negatives if progress is to be made.
People need to live in organic communities that grow and change to meet the wider context of the society of which they are a part. Living in fortress toytown may be the dream of witless romantics but sustainable communities need more realism, imagination and energy.
The Atlantic Islands Centre proposal is one which would bring new life and new opportunity to Luing while also enlarging its sphere of influence as an information junction for Argyll’s Atlantic islands.
The Isle of Luing
Luing is one of the celebrated Argyll slate islands, with the remnants of its slate quarries and quarriers cottages at the two villages of Cullipool and Toberonochy.
The proposed centre includes the former Engine House, with a contemporary addition.
Unlike some of its fellows, Luing is large enough and has land capable of having an agricultural as well as a fishing base, so it is, to a degree, a working island still. Luing cattle, a cross between Highlands and Shorthorns, were officially recognised as a breed in 1965. Clams/scallops, prawns and lobsters are the main focus for fishing.
Luing has the remains of two hill forts in commanding positions. Bronze age artefacts have been discovered on one of these. There are also the remnants of what seems to have been a sort of Crannog, with similar structures also on nearby Loch Seil.
The island is reached from the main road south of Oban via the secondary road to the Isle of Seil, by crossing the legendary Bridge Over the Atlantic and taking the minutes-long short ferry journey across the Cuan Sound.
The island – the archipelago – is very much a world of its own – as indeed are most areas of the amazingly diverse and beautiful Argyll.
The origins of the proposal
The Luing History Group could be said to have been the genesis of the move to provide an Atlantic Islands Centre.
The group describes its work as ‘collating and recording historical, ethnological, biological, archaeological, geological and other related information’. Its aim is to press the heritage and history of the Isle of Luing into service for the education and betterment of the widest possible audience.
As time has gone on, the group has also brought into its remit its adjacent, smaller and mainly uninhabited islands, including the Garvellachs, Scarba, Lunga, Torsa, Shuna, Fladda, Belnahua, Rubha Fiola and other small islets.
This has created the sense of Luing as a potential centre for the islands not only within but beyond its immediate vicinity. Others with related but different interests, like the Geopoetics group, have also been drawn to the attractions of helping to bond island alliances. Here there is the lure of creating affinities in contemporary culture, with its tap roots into island traditions.
In a way, the noti0n of a centre for the Atlantic Islands based in a small island close inshore, runs parallel to creating a St Kilda Centre on the Western Isles. This is guaranteed to be accessible virtually all the time; informing those who will find the opportunity to take passage out to the reverberant island group; and giving those who will never actually see it rich insights into its history and the lives it supported and destroyed.
The arguments around the proposal
We have read the eight objecting and three supporting letters/emails to the Council’s planners and have tried to look objectively at the picture that arises from them.
Here are what we consider to be the key facts emerging, for and against, fairly and objectively:
- Luing is still a working island so, while something can be done to sustain a working population and working lives there, it should be done.
- Ambition and change need to be embraced with discrimination. Without them, any community – any individual, any nation – will become moribund. With them, indiscriminately adopted, important and delicate social and economic balances can be lost.
- The Community Trust seems initially to have wanted simply to restore the Engine House and make it a host for the historical records the Luing History Group collects; and for archaeological artefacts. There are questions as to whether or not conditions could be engineered in this historic structure that would be capable of the adequate preservation of historical documents.
- The departure fr0m this first proposal may have been driven by Highlands and Islands Enterprise, which would fund a more expansive proposal founded on a business plan demonstrating its independent sustainability.
- The community seem universally to want to see the Engine House brought back into productive use.
- The two villages, Cullipool itself and Toberonochy, already have village halls. As with Lismore – which proved unfounded, there are fears that a third and larger facility would leave these buildings struggling to survive. There is not a need for all three.
- The site for the proposed Atlantic Islands Centre, to link with the old Engine House is quite tightly squeezed in front of the edge of a deep, water-filled slate quarry. Safety issues have bee raised relating to this location – but these cannot be insurmountable.
- The number of car parking spaces in the plan – four, plus two disabled parking spaces – is said to be inadequate to the numbers envisaged visiting the centre. There are concerns in the objections that under capacity would lead to random parking in the village, causing disputes with residents. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that great numbers of cars would visit simultaneously and this place is not a tour coach destination..
- Local roads in Seil and Luing and the Luing ferry (currently leaking and out of service) are both seen to be vulnerable to seriously increased usage – if indeed such volumes were likely. Again, such a centre as that proposed is more likely to receive a steady but modest volume of traffic – not day-long surges.
- Some objectors say that they would not oppose the creation of an Atlantic Islands Centre – if it was built somewhere else and out of Cullipool. This has all the hallmarks of nimbyism.
- Others point out that such a building needs to be organic in its location – to be in what was a centre of the working island in its industrial heyday, so that visitors can absorb the original and changing nature of the place. And of course it does.
- One objector says that perhaps if Cullipool was made a ‘warmer’ place, more visitors would come and more would stay. There is an issue here that reaches beyond attitudes to the proposed resource.
The big issues
There are two: indiscriminate policy development and muddled thinking by the enterprise agency; and a fortress mentality in some islanders.
Funding as the driver
There is an endemic problem here with HIE’s position – which is very familiar.
It is unhelpful to seduce communities into having more than they really want, need or can sustain. It is equally unhelpful virtually to compel them to produce unrealistic business plans which work to show that achieving the impossible might indeed be possible.
Auchindrain Township Museum in Mid Argyll – on the side of the A83 trunk road through Argyll – now says unequivocally that it can never hope to earn enough to support itself properly – and that even if it could, such numbers would destroy the fragile structure of the little historic township the museum preserves.
It is important to focus on what can be earned and to look at community assets in these terms – but it is too often ridiculous to force anticipation of unrealistic business volumes.
The Western Isles have massive sums of money pumped into them on every pretext imaginable. This can be indiscriminate on occasion but is born from the will to see such communities enabled to survive.
That determination – that value set – needs to be more widely applied. There is no reason why other small populations should not be supported in developing what they know they need and can modestly sustain.
Similarly if they have ambitious proposals which would regenerate a community while bringing a modest commercial advantage, that too is defensible within existing precedent, if one rarely applied to Argyll.
The Isle of Raasay – population 94 – was given over £4 million by HIE via the Big Lottery’s Growing Communities Fund, which it controls, to buy and refocus the Raasay Estate and Raasay House.
Repel invaders
On the second issue – that of the ‘repel invaders’ mindset – when we read the comment from a supporter of the proposal – that it would be better if Cullipool became a ‘warmer’ place, it chimed with what we were beginning to feel as we read the objections.
It was hard to avoid a sense of claustrophobia in a scenario where anyone visiting is observed, scrutinised and corralled into being as unobtrusive as possible.
While everyone in every circumstance needs to behave with consideration for others, joyous engagement with a new place cannot always be a silent or a still affair. There is a balance to be struck.
If you love your place, share it generously with those interested enough to come to engage with it.
If you want to repel invaders as opposed to welcome new friends, buy something large enough to give you the comfort of isolation. If you can’t afford to do that, celebrate what you have and share it. Understand that there are others who also love tranquil and enchanting places – that is what they come to find and they will not be there for long.
And…
It is always wise and constructive to consider the other side of a debate. There may be some substance to some of the objections. If the community works together, it is inconceivable that solutions to these cannot be found to the benefit of all concerned.












Twitter Comment
RT @ForArgyll: [link to post] > Isle of Luing ambition to build an Atlantic Islands Centre
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Edit
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Twitter Comment
RT @ForArgyll [link to post] > Isle of Luing ambition to build an Atlantic Islands Centre
– Posted using Chat Catcher
Edit
Like or Dislike:
0
0
As one of the objectors to the proposal and despite the success of the planning application probably benefiting my self catering business based in Cullipool and me financially,your biased editorial above although capturing some of the truth about our dilemna should not confuse the success of the Lismore project with what we are trying to achieve on Luing. Firstly, the design of the museum on Lismore is in my opinion very decent and I agree with some of your remarks regarding what it has achieved.Luing is not Lismore and never will be.
I was very surprised at you quoting that one supporter of the project has found Cullipool to be unfriendly as many of the 800 or so visitors to my self-catering cottage over the last 10 years have commented on the very special welcome they received when meeting the locals and taking part in activities in the local hall.
I agree that communities can become polarised and that the people of Luing are in danger of reaching such a situation.
You paint the Trust in glowing terms and are quite disparaging of anyone who might dissent calling them Nimbyists or other terms but please believe that what I and many objectors would like is for a decent compromise to be reached and one which will be to the benefit of the community as a whole.
I cannot respond totally to your editorial above but have to say that in my opinion the design of the museum in Luing is not as good as Lismore. I may have worded my objection to the planners more strongly!
You paint the Trust and its aspirations as presenting a glowing picture of harmonisation and fulfillment and appear to condemn objectors as the opposite.
You mention the love of tranquil and enchanting places and the selfishness of those who want to keep it for themselves.
You fail to mention or appreciate the inappropriate size of the development,the poor design of the museum, the destruction of the engine shed without proper conservation advice,the lack of any useful business plan and the very poor communication between the Trust and those who they say they represent. Maybe you expect that all these projects should be bailed out by the tax payer…after all that is where the charity money comes from.Yes lets have another museum..
I totally agree with your comments regarding the pressure put upon Groups of well meaning people who honestly desire to achieve something different for their community by those who dole out the funds and The Luing Community trust do have my sympathy but this is a project driven too far and too long and in my opinion down the wrong road!
Your final comment “If the community works together, it is inconceivable that solutions to these cannot be found to the benefit of all concerned” is totally true and one which I totally support.But compromise has to come from both sides.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
For Cully Pettigrew: There is actually much more that we agree on than disagree on and your own attitude is exemplary. Your position is clear and committed and you want the community to work together and come to an agreed solution – which inevitably involves compromise. That you are clearly prepared to engage in finding compromises – and would expect others to do the same, shows the core strength of the Luing community.
What we support in the Trust is its essential willingness to drive change to try to contribute to stemming the decline of Luing’s population. Change always arouses contrary passions and the Trust is courageous in sticking its head above the parapet. We back all of that unequivocally.
The detail of how this is done is down to the community as a whole and in so many ways there does not seem to us to be anything irresovable between your perspectives and the Trust’s.
If, together, you can take the aggro out of the situation – and any sense of winners and losers whatever the outcome, it’s actually great fun to knock competing ideas around.
For instance, you don’t like Shauna Cameron’s design. Others do. It’s needn’t be an us-and-them thing and it’s not a right-and-wrong thing. You should all be able to look at it objectively, share and discuss the way aspects of it are perceived by different people and try to understand each others’ view. Whatever you do in the end, you will all come out of such a process stronger and more coherent as a community. And more people may volunteer to take on specific responsibilities. In the end, it’s community cohesion that matters.
We wish the entire community well and look forward to what you do – and how you do it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I think there is an element of bias in the editorial you have published. While stating you wish to be objective, you unfortunately betray this position by uncritically stating the case for the museum whilst taking a more interrogative approach to the case against. You are clearly taking a position in this argument.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
For Marie Murphy; Fair comment. We are objective, within the limits of being committed to constructive change – and while not imagining that what we would see as constructive change is the only possible version. We also believe that the Luing community – as an entirety (which is what is most important) – has the capacity to work together for the common good and in a spirit of sensitive compromise. And we really look forward to seeing what it does and how it does it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“rather than have a decision swayed by people who visit; by second homers;”
Are you aware that at least 2 of the Trust directors were, until the last few years, “second homers” ? So now they have retired does their opinion becomes more important than the other “second homers” ?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
For A: Short answer to your question: Yes.
Why? Because it’s not about being an incomer, it’s about being committed to living in a place. People who move permanently into what has been a second home are making that commitment – and, living full time in a place, they know it more deeply and invest themselves in it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
What not said is important, let me make it clear. With an ear to the ground in my community, (talking and listening) there is a definate resentment to the proposed centre, not to the museum, but to the folly that is being persued by an individual who is on a personal campaign to bring Luing into his pretentious world of Geopoetics and new world grounding. (look it up).
I know with certainty that if this individual did the correct thing and stepped down from the Trust and the trust then returned to its original concept I guarentee that we would have a Community Trust that would once again be trusted by the community. It isn’t now!
There has been a great failure by directors to listen to people. They seem to have been blinkered by the greed for gold,
We don’t want anything other than space for the hard working history group to show the fruits of 10 years labour. Take heed you are losing trust members, your losing history group members, ask yourselves WHY.
I would hope there will come a time when you will have to admit you were wrong. But I doubt it.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I have recently spent a wonderful week on Luing. Whilst on the island I listened to both sides of this obviously contentious issue. I also looked at the rather ambitious plans for the centre which I thought seemed rather large scale for the proposed site. In the light of this, I feel that the tone of your editorial is anything but objective. Although you present both sides of the argument you are rather disparaging of the objectors views. I obviously have limited experience of life on the island but I would certainly echo the concerns around the road and ferry links. One of the most attractive features of Luing is it’s remoteness. Please be sure that in a well meaning attempt to improve the island you don’t spoil something very special. If it’s not broken…….
On a lighter note, I would like to say what a warm place I found Cullipool to be. Despite a rather somber first impression, I could not have felt more welcome. Lovely island, lovely people.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
For Fiona Nouri: Good news and fair comment.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Once again Luing C T have pulled out all the stops and added another insult to the people of Luing. The A.G.M. was a stage managed afair which was over in 25 minutes and left a packed meeting agog with astonishment, the meeting was over and done with so quickly.
What an insult. Were they running scared after a stormy reception at a meeting held last week in Toberonochy where they were left without any doubt that Luing does not want to be associated with this psuedo money grabbing Trust with a hidden agenda and some directors who have a vested interest.
Live on Luing, Know the people, know what they want, and act by it. The Trust is not trusted, neither does it work for the community. They have dug a great big hole in the island and can not get out. Its a sad state of afairs in the Fifedom of Luing.
Give the Trust the back to the community.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Pingback: Argyll News: Luing at war: is this the shortest AGM on record? :Argyll,Luing,Atlantic Islands Centre,divisions, | For Argyll