Comments on: Angus Robertson & Jim Mather’s response to MoD Chinook revelations http://forargyll.com/2010/01/angus-robertson-jim-mathers-response-to-mod-chinook-revelations/ Fri, 25 May 2012 15:41:57 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kenneth MacCollhttp://forargyll.com/2010/01/angus-robertson-jim-mathers-response-to-mod-chinook-revelations/#comment-25015 Kenneth MacColl Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:20:33 +0000 http://forargyll.com/?p=18875#comment-25015 I suppose we should be relieved that there is no comment from Kintyre1 on this I suppose we should be relieved that there is no comment from Kintyre1 on this

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: David McEwan Hillhttp://forargyll.com/2010/01/angus-robertson-jim-mathers-response-to-mod-chinook-revelations/#comment-24833 David McEwan Hill Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:29:59 +0000 http://forargyll.com/?p=18875#comment-24833 The total intransigence of the MOD against all the evidence in this matter has fuelled a huge suspicion about why they have remained in that position. The total intransigence of the MOD against all the evidence in this matter has fuelled a huge suspicion about why they have remained in that position.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>