Blair says he’d have invaded Iraq without the WMD threat
published this on 12:07 pm, Saturday, 12th December, 2009Community News| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |
We know he would. He did.
Related Posts
The Latest News from ForArgyll delivered via email, weekly or daily. You know it makes sense!
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post











Loading...
December 12th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Classic comment….and sooooo true!
Even when he tells the truth it stinks.
December 13th, 2009 at 11:07 am
This demonstrates nothing more clearly ‘ that absolute power corrupts absolutley ‘ and sums up Labours whole time in goverment.
December 13th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Beware of the Chilcot Inquiry. I would direct all interested person to the blog of Craig Murray (ex UK ambassador). He examines each person on it and exposes them as far from the impartial truthseekers they would have us believe they are.
The Chilcot Inquiry is designed to scapegoat Tony Blair and by default absolve others from any blame in a war crime which has left hundreds and thousands of innocent Iraqis dead and their nation blown back into the middle ages.
Tony Blair’s silence to date begs a number of questions.
Is he on board with this plan?
Is he going to come out and implicate those immediately around him (Gordon “as much money as it takes” Brown in particular)?
Was Brown so weak as a lieutenant that he couldn’t stop Blair? What an indictment!
Was the Labour cabinet made up of cardboard cut-outs? (No surprise there)
Does anybody believe that the Labour Government would have given this Inquiry the go-ahead unless they thought they could get some benefit from it?