Blair says he’d have invaded Iraq without the WMD threat

published this on 12:07 pm, Saturday, 12th December, 2009
Community News| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |

We know he would. He did.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post

3 Responses to “Blair says he’d have invaded Iraq without the WMD threat”

  1. Kenneth MacColl Says:

    Classic comment….and sooooo true!

    Even when he tells the truth it stinks.

  2. Spike Says:

    This demonstrates nothing more clearly ‘ that absolute power corrupts absolutley ‘ and sums up Labours whole time in goverment.

  3. David McEwan Hill Says:

    Beware of the Chilcot Inquiry. I would direct all interested person to the blog of Craig Murray (ex UK ambassador). He examines each person on it and exposes them as far from the impartial truthseekers they would have us believe they are.

    The Chilcot Inquiry is designed to scapegoat Tony Blair and by default absolve others from any blame in a war crime which has left hundreds and thousands of innocent Iraqis dead and their nation blown back into the middle ages.
    Tony Blair’s silence to date begs a number of questions.
    Is he on board with this plan?
    Is he going to come out and implicate those immediately around him (Gordon “as much money as it takes” Brown in particular)?
    Was Brown so weak as a lieutenant that he couldn’t stop Blair? What an indictment!
    Was the Labour cabinet made up of cardboard cut-outs? (No surprise there)
    Does anybody believe that the Labour Government would have given this Inquiry the go-ahead unless they thought they could get some benefit from it?

Leave a Reply