Responses to first news of MoD plans for Argyll submarine nuclear waste sites
published this on 10:58 am, Tuesday, 3rd November, 2009Community News| Environment| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |
The MoD made no contact with the responsible local authority but wrote to advise Argyll & Bute MP, Alan Reid, that ‘one or more’ unspecified sites ‘in your locality’ are under consideration to host irradiated material removed from redundant nuclear submarines.
Mr Reid is reported as saying that he will vigorously oppose this – and any – proposal to site nuclear waste of any kind in Argyll & Bute. He has also been in touch with us to say that he has written to Secretary of State for Defence, Bob Ainsworth suggesting that he confirm the sites under consideration. rather than leave the matter open to speculation. (On this, For Argyll can confirm that, as we have said in our main feature and on authority, the 5 sites under consideration in Scotland are: Doonreay, Hunterston, Rosyth, Coulport and Faslane.)
Mike Mackenzie, the SNP candidate challenging Mr Reid at the next General Election said: ‘I can tell you with assurance that SNP will vigorously oppose the dumping of nuclear waste in Argyll and Bute at all levels; in Argyll and Bute Council, in the Scottish Parliament, in Brussels and in Westminster.
As an individual, as a Parliamentary Candidate and, if I am elected, as MP for Argyll and Bute, I will work with colleagues at every level and using all legal means at our disposal to oppose the dumping of nuclear waste in Argyll and Bute.
We in SNP have been clear and unequivocal in our policies about the long term hazards of nuclear waste from power stations and about submarines carrying nuclear missiles.
Politicians from those Parties which support nuclear power generation and Trident should be careful that they are not dismissed and labelled as ‘nimbys’ because, in supporting these technologies, it necessarily follows that eventually nuclear material has to be disposed of and such disposal has to be in someone’s back yard’.
Gary Mulvaney, the Scottish Conservative candidate also challenging Mr Reid’s tenancy of the Argyll & But seat, said: ‘At the moment we are dealing with a leaked report which may or may not give the full story. In the first instance, I will be seeking sight of the full report. (Mr Mulvaney is referring to the leaking to journalists of a report commissioned by the MoD from the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. This examined the feasibility of its Scottish storage sites for irradiated waste from redundant nuclear submarines – and covered in our main feature on this matter.)
‘The potential sites for the UK’s long term nuclear waste depository have been under discussion for many years, so its not news that of course, Faslane and Coulport in Argyll , and Rosyth in Fife have been looked at. That doesn’t mean that they are necessarily being actively considered – so much work, such as geological surveys need to be done.
‘My view is that when a decision needs to be made, and that is still some way off, for a whole variety of reasons, Sellafield will finish up as the preferred, rational and considered option for the UK’s nuclear waste depository.
‘If I’m an MP for Argyll & Bute, that is what I will be pressing an incoming Conservative government to do. So let’s not start fighting phoney wars just so politicians can be seen to be doing something’.
Related Posts
The Latest News from ForArgyll delivered via email, weekly or daily. You know it makes sense!
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post











Loading...
November 3rd, 2009 at 12:53 pm
The sad truth is that nuclear wast does have to be disposed of. There is plenty stockpiled even now awaiting a solution to the problem of long term disposal. There is medical requirements for nuclear material which generates waste requiring disposed of in similar sites to the waste from nuclear power stations or nuclear power plants on submarines.
People tend to see disposal of waste as a horror to be avoided at all costs. It can also be seen as an opportunity. When something unpleasant has to be done, financial compensation is often used to sweeten the unpalatable pill. The local community around the site of a long term disposal site should be generously compensated by the rest of the country. If a community took a serious look at how they could improve their infrastucture and facilities with generous funding they may take a different view of the matter.
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Ex-welder, Indian Nuclear Reactor Complex, New York, from The new York Times, March 24, 1978 (Nuclear Power, MAUM Booklet, Oct. 1985) :
I accepted a temporary assignment there three years ago without knowing what it could possibly do to me. But now I hear top scientists saying there are no safe levels of radiation and I don’t want to end up someone else’s mistake.
Nor do we!!!