Mulvaney reveals the game for Argyll & Bute in the coming General Election
published this on 10:49 pm, Tuesday, 20th October, 2009Community News| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |
The prequel campaign for Argyll & Bute in the next general election is hotting up.
The Conservative candidate for Westminster, Gary Mulvaney, speaker at a recent meeting in McColl’s Hotel, Dunoon, called on Liberal Democrat voters in the constituency to ‘come home’ to the Conservative.
The call refers to Argyll & Bute’s constituency history. It was a Conservative seat taken by Ray Michie in June 1987 for the then Liberal-SDP Alliance. She defeated the sitting Conservative MP, John Mackay.
Since then, Argyll & Bute has been a Liberal Democrat seat, inherited by Alan Reid after Ray Michie’s retirement before the 2001 General Election.
The Labour party is not a force in Argyll, although the 2001 General Election saw a revival of its fortunes driven by a very able candidate, Hugh Raven with votes by those who had not yet seen through the Blair illusion. Alan Reid said, after the result, that he had been quite nervous going into the Count because he was aware of the surge in the Labour Vote. Progressive popular withdrawal of support from the later Blair administrations and the current Brown one sees Labour unlikely to make it into visibility this time.
The SNP trailed in third place in the 2005 General Election but since then the political colour and performance of Scotland has changed. Argyll went SNP by narrowly voting in Jim Mather as its MSP in the 2007 elections to the Scottish Parliament.
The SNP Government’s strategic and operational capability – driven centrally by the calibre of John Swinney as Cabinet Secretary for Finance, has strengthened that party’s position in the public’s trust. Mather’s personal performance as Minister for Enterprise, Energy and Tourism has raised Argyll’s ambitions and given it a taste for an unfamiliar influence.
The Argyll & Bute seat is seen as a possible take by both the SNP and the Scottish Conservatives.
Mulvaney’s move now openly nails the specific battleground in Argyll. The fight will be for the Liberal Democrat vote.
Mackenzie will look to the extent to which Jim Mather has justified Argyll’s trust since he was voted its constituency MSP. Beyond mobilising those wishing to see an independent Scotland, Mackenzie will focus on the political advantage to Argyll of strengthening its alliance to the SNP, with influence where it matters, in Scotland.
Mulvaney is now already calling on a proportion of the Liberal Democrat vote to look to its roots and to vote for access to influence where the national power games are played out, at Westminster. It is recognised as probable that the 2010 election will see the nation reject Labour and vote in a Conservative administration for the first time since 1997.
Both of these candidates will challenge voters in Argyll to put Argyll first and vote for the influence which the Liberal Democrat sitting MP cannot offer. The best card the Lib Dems can play is to talk up the possibility of a hung Parliament where they would be king-makers.
For this card to be successful here, Alan Reid is going to have to say which side, in such a situation, his party would put into power. If the Lib Dem support will simply go to the highest bidder, such a stance will cut little ice in its appeal to the post-expenses scandal public. Voters are looking for something other than carpetbaggers, in person or party.
This fight for the Liberal Democrat vote will focus on two key areas:
- the track records in office of the SNP in Holyrood and the Conservatives in Westminster, working through the Scottish office (and we’ve just corrected a typo with SNP resonances – ‘Westmonster’)
- the unionism versus independence issue, with a referendum on this possibly being put to the Scottish people towards the end of 2010 – after the General Election
Mulvaney is already opening up a position on these matters. At the same meeting in Dunoon he attacked the SNP on its separatism.
‘The SNP have a single objective and that is to break up Britain and Alex Salmond and his nationalist MPs will seek to pick a fight with a British government on every occasion. That won’t do Argyll & Bute any favours and it certainly will not help Scotland recover from Labour’s recession’.
He questioned what relevance the SNP would have in fixing Labour’s recession, how they would be able to tackle Britain’s debt burden and what contribution they would make in reforming the UK’s welfare system. ‘When the choice is between a Labour and Conservative government, the SNP are simply not relevant to the British debate’.
He also called on Lib Dem voters to back the Conservatives to get Labour out of Downing Street.
Then he laid out the ground shared by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats – on progressive politics and liberal democracy, citing the Conservative opposition to ID cards; its belief in social justice and the work done in this area by its former leader, Iain Duncan Smith. Then he ran up the environmental flag, asserting that in David Cameron the Conservative Party has a leader personally committed to the climate change agenda.
Then Mulvaney turned his fire on the sitting Lib Dem MP, Alan Reid – as both he and the SNP candidate, Mike Mackenzie, will have to do in their respective battles for gains in this sector of the vote. He said: ‘For 23 years in Argyll & Bute, we have had a Lib Dem MP and been on the political fringes. That’s not good enough, we need to be at the heart of British politics where influence matters.
‘So if you’re a Lib Dem voter asking yourself how Argyll can get influence and which Government will deliver on the things that matter to you, I would ask you to get the change you want and vote for David Cameron and the Conservatives’ – and for Gary Mulvaney, of course.
Alan Reid is going to have the fight of his life. He is certainly not looking at increasing his vote. He is looking to save enough of it to return to Westminster for his party.
It will be a tennis match, with Reid alone at one end of the court defending againt attacks from both Mulvaney and Mackenzie at the other end. But any winning smash each of them puts past him is as likely to benefit the other as themseves. Reid’s best strategy will be to find a way of setting them against each other, at least to dilute their assaults upon himself. If he gets disoriented in a blizzard of defending against simultaneous multi-directional attacks, he will lose – but to whom?
Note: For Argyll has just published 3 simultaneous articles on these two serious challengers for the Argyll & Bute seat at Westminster. These are:
- The For Argyll Political Challenge: the interviews
- Gary Mulvaney – no standard Tory
- Mike Mackenzie – a complex Nationalist
Related Posts
The Latest News from ForArgyll delivered via email, weekly or daily. You know it makes sense!
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post











Loading...
October 20th, 2009 at 11:47 pm
There is and always has been a significant anti Tory majority in Argyll and Bute and the Tory only wins when they maximise their vote in a situation when the SNP and the LibDems split the anti Tory vote evenly.
My reading however is that the Tory vote has shrunk so far now that this is no longer in their reach in this constituency and the recent Euro result would underline this. The Tories were a poor third behind a poor second for the LibDems with the SNP almost 10points ahead of the LibDem vote.
In one respect however Mulvaney is absolutely correct. A big part of the ineffectual Alan Reid’s support has been from disaffected Tories and I’m sure a significant section of them are now moving back to the Tories. Information I’ve seen gathered from door to door canvassing shows a movement from LibDems to SNP also so I would be prepared to bet heavily if there was a General Election soon Alan Reid would have no chance of retaining this seat. I think most informed people in Argyll and Bute strongly believe this to be the case at the moment.
A lot of the Labour vote in Argyll and Bute has voted LibDem to keep the Tory out in the past. I am sure that the SNP will take most of this vote this time.
On present figures Mulvaney is battling Reid for a poor second place and the Labour candidate will be lucky to get 2000 votes.
My prediction? Mike MacKenzie 12,500; Gary Mulvaney 8000; Alan Reid 7,500; David Graham 2000
A week is along time in politics however.
October 20th, 2009 at 11:51 pm
I hope you’re right but I have a feeling that the SNP are firmly ahead at this moment in most of Argyll and Bute. The Helensburgh factor may make a big difference however as this is added onto us for Westminster elections. Any polling results from Helensburgh?
October 21st, 2009 at 8:30 pm
i expect snp mouthpieces to spout nationalist propaganda but to read in the lead article that the snp came third in the 2005 in argyll & bute is just incredible .
for the record in 2005 the snp came a poor FOURTH place – over 9000 votes behind the liberal , 3500 votes behind the tory and 3000 votes behind labour . snp vote down 2% liberal up 3.7%
fast forward to 2010 , the overwhelming unionist majority in the constituency have to decide how best to prevent the election of a nationalist . seen in this context , not since 1987 is there likely to be such a high level of tactical voting .
most labour people despise the snp and are likely to vote liberal in considerable numbers to try to prevent a conservative victory
a considerable number of tory voters will hold their noses and vote for alan reid to stop the nats
no doubt the liberals will surprise everyone by their high vote count in part earned by their commendable opposition to the snp at holyrood
October 21st, 2009 at 9:36 pm
“no doubt the liberals will surprise everyone by their high vote count in part earned by their commendable opposition to the snp at holyrood”
What a laugh.
No need to make any further comment except that it has been very firmly established that the vast majority of remaining Labour supporters have SNP firmly as their second choice.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:28 pm
Indeed, Willie. Not a lot of point of answering kintyre1′s posts as they demonstrably uninformed nonsense.
I am the first to concede when the results are not good for the SNP so I never indulge in fantasy figures or projections or, like kintyre1, childish wishful thinking.
So popular are Alan Reid and the LibDems in A&B that they came in nearly 10 points BEHIND the SNP in Argyll and Bute at the Euro Election. THAT IS A FACT. NOT A FIGMENT OF MY IMAGINATION. For every two people, for example, who voted LibDem three voted SNP.
I have little doubt that many will have noticed the collection of contradictions in kintyre1′s post above. I think there is little point in further response to his sour and delusional offerings.
October 22nd, 2009 at 12:18 pm
For kintyre1, it is now 2009 “There is no confusion like the confusion of a simple mind.”
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
Now is the time to put childish things aside and the good caring citizens that love Argyll will vote for a better, stronger Argyll with the SNP representing them in Westminster.
October 22nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm
who wins the euro election in argyll & bute has been proven to be no guide to the following general election result .
snp supporters here have chosen to overlook the george lyon factor .
mr lyon was candidate in the scottish election and the euro one . a very unpopular figure in argyll , he is loathed by many on bute , party came second to the get rid of lyon factor
i find it regretable that nationalists are happy to back slap with one another all day but refuse to seriously engage with anyone of a different viewpoint .
October 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 pm
And when was that “proven”. Evidence, please.
I have all the facts and figures but I’ll let kintyre1 provide them first.
October 23rd, 2009 at 8:36 pm
here’s your evidence……………. 1999 euro election result argyll & bute snp 1st , tory 2nd , lib3rd
following general election 2001 lib 1st , lab 2nd , tory 3rd , SNP FOURTH
October 23rd, 2009 at 10:29 pm
Exactly.
That was 10 years ago.
We all know the SNP was in that position 10 years ago in Argyll and Bute and in fact the Euro result proved to be an exact guide to the relative parliamentary position.
As will be the current case with the SNP in first position by a mile.
Next silly point?
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:00 pm
i think kinytyre1 is an snp who just puts these silly points up to help the snp because they are all easy to answer