Investigation into Salmond’s expenses claim for attempt to impeach Blair on Iraq
newsroom published this on 1:38 am, Wednesday, 15th July, 2009Community News| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |
In a parochial game of conkers played out at Westminster, Labour peer Lord Foulkes has taken a whack at the knuckles of Scotland’s First Minister. He has lodged a formal complaint against Alex Salmond with John Lyon, the Standards Commissioner. His charge relates to Mr Salmond’s claim on expenses for his share (£790) of the fees for legal advice in the joint attempt by the SNP and Plaid Cymru to bring Tony Blair to account for taking Britain illegally to war with Iraq.
The case Lord Foulkes has put forward, which the Commissioner has accepted for investigation, is that Mr Salmond has used his expenses for the pursuit of party political activities – which is against the rules.
In taking this action, Lord Foulkes has demonstrated powerfully that the Labour Party is not only stuck in parish pump political game playing but cannot tell right from wrong.
The central issue in the attempt to impeach Tony Blair was always a moral one. Had it succeeded, any party political advantage accruing to it would have been incidental. What still matters is rightness and just deserts.
Blair’s actions in, at the very least, underinforming Parliament and taking Britain to war with Iraq on a false premise of which it is hard to accept he was unaware, remain uninvestigated – as does the inexplicable death of Dr David Kelly.
Two factors may change this situation:
- Gordon Brown’s political weakness may make it finally impossible to protect Blair from full investigation in the failed attempt to hold the Iraq Inquiry in private and with a very limited brief. It is understood that Blair had friends intercede with Brown on his behalf, in his anxiety that the inquiry, if full and open, might result in his losing the post he covets. For several years he has been scheming to become the first permanent President of the European Union.
- The legal challenge by a consortium of serious medical opinion to the discredited Hutton report’s conclusions is calling for a Coroner’s Inquest into Dr Kelly’s death to be held, as it should already legally have been. Hutton conveniently concluded that Dr Kelly committed suicide by cutting the small and inaccessible Ulnar artery in his wrist with a blunt gardening knife. The doctors concerned contend that this is a medical impossibility on several grounds.
Foulkes’ little move was so blinkered in its keenness to score against his political superior that he failed to take account of President Obama’s admission this week that Britain is actually at much greater risk than the USA of terrorist action in retribution for its part in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Blair’s action in taking the country into these wars, against the evidence, against the clear weight of public opinion and probably against legal opinion was unarguably wrong. Now we know that his actions have made us an enemy deemed by terrorists to be even more reprehensible than the principal, America, Blair so self-interestedly supported. And maybe we are.
If Alex Salmond had claimed for the entire legal bill of £14,000 instead of his £790 share of it, it would still have been a proper use of public money in its drive to restore integrity to public life.
Related Posts
The Latest News from ForArgyll delivered via email, weekly or daily. You know it makes sense!
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post
Loading...
July 17th, 2009 at 11:47 am
Well said.
I suspect this idiocy by George Foulkes has already backfired as the last thing the Labour Party needs is the population reminded of the huge deceit which was used to take us into a murderous and illegal invasion of Iraq.
It is about time that Lord Foulkes was subjected to some serious scrutiny over the huge sums of public money he accumulates in various expenses while providing no obvious useful political purpose whatsover.
Like Union Jim Murphy he careers about the Scottish political scene at significant public expense with no evident agenda other than attacking the SNP.
March 22nd, 2010 at 7:26 pm
I must have missed this story, but on the assumption that its never too late, here goes.
Would this be the same Lord George Foulkes who writes a column for the Edinburgh Evening News under the description of “a respected politician”, who claimed nearly £45,000 in overnight expenses to stay in a property he inherited from his late mother?
George Foulkes, who is also an MSP, billed the public to stay in a London flat registered as his company’s address. His London abode also appears to be the business address for his work as a director and political consultant with Carrick Court Associates, which makes £50,000 per year.
The Lord Foulkes who claimed £54,441 in allowances for 94 days attendance (£579/day)at the House of Lords.
Earns £36,000 as a Parliamentary Consultant to Eversheds LLP for 36 days work (£1000/day)
Claimed £3061.17 in allowances from the Scottish Parliament between April 2008 and March 2009
Salary for a Member of the Scottish Parliament £56,671.
So he trousers £110,000 in salary from the taxpayer, more than a government minister. The Lord George Foulkes continues to waste public and government time and money by asking stupid questions like how much money the Scottish Government has spent on spacehoppers, and the one above, which reportedly costs the Government nearly £100,000 to answer.
No this cant be the same person. He wouldnt be so stupid surely!
March 22nd, 2010 at 8:24 pm
There is a “buffoon wing ” in the Scottish Parliament and Lord Ffffffoukes leads it.
March 22nd, 2010 at 8:42 pm
For Independista and David McEwan Hill: Could not agree more with you both – the facts tell the story and the bully’s only thinly disguised behind the buffoon. This is truly unpleasant piece of work.