Gary Mulvaney: Argyll and the defence establishment

published this on 9:30 am, Sunday, 14th June, 2009
Defence| News| Politics | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |

Gary Mulvaney photo 3

Our armed forces and their families are the backbone of the nation’s security. With major defence establishments at Coulport and Faslane, they play an important role in the life of Argyll & Bute.

At a strategic level, there now needs to be a formal all-encompassing defence review. It is over ten years since the last one, and the world has changed immensely, so a defence review is well overdue and needs to address some of the following areas:

  • Objectives, Commitments & Resources – Any review needs to determine the objectives, detail our commitments and importantly ensure the resources are made available. If the United Kingdom wishes to maintain its global influence for good, then proper funding is a pre-requisite. Too often the temptation has been to fund things on the cheap. If that is the case, then politicians should be honest with the country and our armed forces, reducing their objectives accordingly. Matching resources with commitments will resolve the current overstretch and mission fatigue, helping combat the worrying trend in retention especially amongst servicemen.
  • Society & Our Armed Forces -  Our Armed Forces command respect and we should encourage school visits, the wearing of uniforms in public, welcome home parades, Veterans Day and work experience in the services for young people. The Secretary of State should be a prestigious full time political, not a musical chair appointment in an annual cabinet reshuffle. Although we can criticise the US for some things, the way in which ordinary US citizens supports their forces and families is commendable.
  • Equipment Procurement – Defence procurement is dominated by projects that are over-budget, late, and sometimes operationally defective or redundant. It is critical that service personnel have the right equipment and protection when on operations and it is the duty of government to ensure they get it when they need it. Capability, interoperability, adaptability, affordability and exportability are five criteria for future procurement projects.
  • Welfare – In terms of defence housing, too much service accommodation is still in a dreadful state of repair, with 45% of single living accommodation at the foot of the scale. It is also important that the defence hospital unit and a world class rehabilitation facility are maintained. The issue of compensation, pensions, spouses’ pensions needs resolved with a common sense approach that is consistent with those in the public and private sectors.

These are some of the issues that any Defence Review should look at, but of course from a local perspective there are a number of issues that resonate here in Argyll & Bute.

One of the real concerns locally is the number of MoD houses that remain unoccupied in parts of Argyll. The problem is particularly acute in Helensburgh with over a 100 homes lying empty. With a desperate need for affordable houses for families, much discussion has taken place between council officers, councillors and defence estates on this issue. I hope that a solution can be found, to enable either service families or local residents to occupy these homes.

Of course, no commentary on defence would be complete without mentioning Trident – the UK’s ballistic nuclear deterrent based at Faslane. In a dangerous world with rogue states like North Korea acquiring ballistic nuclear capability we still need the ultimate deterrent. Moreover, the importance of Trident and its successor, to Faslane and Argyll cannot be underestimated. In the absence of Trident, the military need for a UK submarine base at Faslane disappears and with it the 11,000 direct and indirect jobs that it provides. The economic value of Faslane is over £220 million and its closure would prompt a cataclysmic collapse in the local economy, house values, our pubs, restaurants, shops and taxi’s.

A Scotland without nuclear weapons at Faslane may excite some politicians, but it would leave many families in and around Helensburgh with little hope for the future.  And what an advert Helensburgh as a ‘ghost town’ would be as the Lomond gateway into Argyll & Bute. That is why I unashamedly support Faslane, Trident, its successor, our forces and the critical role they play in our community.

Argyll needs politicians to defend our military establishments and that is what I will do.

Gary Mulvaney will be the Scottish Conservative Party candidate in the Argyll & Bute constituency at the next general election for the UK Parliament at Westminster.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • SphereIt
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping | | Print This Post

4 Responses to “Gary Mulvaney: Argyll and the defence establishment”

  1. Ron Wilson Says:

    I can’t help thinking that there would be no hope for any of us, never mind the good folk of Helensburgh, if the British State’s very own Weapons of Mass Destruction were to suffer a catastrophic accident or strike by terrorists.

    The local employment argument is an Aunt Sally that is dealt with in Mike MacKenzie’s contribution. Indeed it was the Labour Secretary of Defence, Geoff Hoon, who blew the ‘Trident means jobs’ propaganda out of the water in a reply to the SNP’s Angus Robertson in 2005:

    Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will estimate how many (a) direct and (b) indirect civilian jobs in (i) Scotland and (ii) the rest of the UK rely upon the Trident programme.

    Mr. Hoon: The number of civilian jobs which directly rely upon the Trident programme is estimated to be 936 in Scotland, with an additional 6,640 in the rest of the United Kingdom. The number of civilian jobs which indirectly rely upon the Trident programme is estimated to be 300 in Scotland and 5,700 for the rest of the UK.

    Of course it is not just the SNP and Scottish civil society who are against Trident. Earlier this year, three of our most senior retired officers called for Britain to scrap the nuclear option. Field Marshal Lord Bramall and Generals Lord Ramsbotham and Sir Hugh Beach said Trident was an irrelevance and the expense of its successor could not be justified. In a letter to the Times, the venerable trio argued the UK continued to be too dependent on America in defence matters. They wrote: “Nuclear weapons have shown themselves to be completely useless as a deterrent to the threats and scale of the violence we currently face.”

    Son of Trident will cost £25 billion. At a time of national belt tightening in the worst recession within living memory we ought to be questioning the skewed values that countenance such profligate spending. And questioning politicians on the stump talking up Trident but keeping shtum about the consequences for public services, not just in Helensburgh but the entire country.

    Both Labour and the Tories know full well that the cost of replacing Trident will have to come out of ADDITIONAL revenue. The question Gerry Mulvaney must answer is, is this money coming out of additional tax, and if not, what are the Conservatives going to cut from public spending to pay for it?

  2. David McEwan Hill Says:

    Until Gary Mulvaney holds his hands up and admits that the jobs figures associated with Trident he quoted widely in newspapers and on this site are absolute rubbish invented by Labour’s Jackie Baillie he cannot be taken seriously.
    I look forward to him conceding that the proposed Trident programme, like the present situation, has minimal employment implications for Scotland and for Argyll and its major significance is to ensure that the Firth of Clyde remains the world’s number one target.

    I presume Gary will join all sensible people in strongly resisiting the dumping of decommissioned or about to be decommissioned nuclear powered subs on his doorstep which, of course, is all the recently trumpeted announcement on this issue actually amounts to.
    As Lord Carrington remarked “The major benefit of Coulport is that it is very remote…….

  3. Argyll News: Round 3 of the For Argyll Political Challenge | For Argyll Says:

    [...] click here for more details « Gary Mulvaney: Argyll and the defence establishment 6 new PhDs in marine energy research offered at Argyll’s SAMS and Thurso’s ERI [...]

  4. Argyll News: Gary Mulvaney - no standard Tory :Argyll,politics,westminster,general election, | For Argyll Says:

    [...] Round 3: Gary Mulvaney on Argyll and the defence establishment [...]

Leave a Reply