Transport Scotland to add road traffic barriers as protection against controversial wooden fences
newsroom published this on 10:18 am, Friday, 21st November, 2008News| Transport | Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |
For Argyll, with other media, has consistently drawn attention to the installation of wooden barriers in lochside locations in Argyll by TranServ. This was done against all advice and against the experience of traumatic injuries when such fences were in use several years ago. At that stage the fences were withdrawn for safety reasons but have recently been reintroduced to sustained controversy.
Now, after an investigation into what happened when a car left the A83 south of Inveraray and went through one of these fences, the fences themselves are to be buffered against traffic leaving the road with the installation of additional barriers.
Since the Inveraray incident, there has been a very recent fatality where two vehicles were in collision at Ardgartan on the A83 on Loch Long. Both vehicles went through the fence there, and man in his sixties who was a passenger in one of them, died. It is not yet known what injuries contributed to the death of this man.
While Transport Scotland’s plans may reduce injuries to road users if the approporiate barriers are installed, it does not answer some basic questions aroud the introduction of the fences themselves.
The fences were said to have been installed t=for the protection of pedestrians, regardless of the risk they posed to road traffic. For Argyll is pursuing the matter. It wants to know:
- What risk assessment was done before the fences were installed?
- What the results of such risk assessments were?
- What numbers of pedestrians had been falling onto the shores in the locations where the fences were later installed?
- Did the man killed at Ardgartan in the recent road accident at the fence there, suffer injuries caused by the fencing and contributing to his death?
Comments (rss) | Respond | Ping |



![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e427830e-422f-4380-803e-6976d1d1cd0e)













Subscribe here
Email Updates
November 21st, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Another example of the absolute idiocy of this government’s departments, quangos and legislation. Too many civil servants administering too much nonsensical legislation dreamed up by fools in cotton wool - people who feel the need to carry out a ‘risk assessment’ before picking up a pen.
Safety barriers for ’safety barriers’. I ask you. Don’t these people know there’s a whole world outside their offices, and that most of its people are laughing up their sleeves at them?
Whatever possessed Transerve to build such ridiculously high and dangerous fences? Weren’t they aware of the dangers? Don’t they know that the only escape from errant vehicles may be a quick scramble off the verge and onto the beach? Why have they put these fences in a few places only? If there’s a need, logic dictates they should line every road in Argyll.
I fear it is more the fact that Transerv, suddenly finding that they could be held responsible for the twisted ankle of the pedestrian who flees the drunken driver, have ‘followed procedures’ (the latest excuse) and absolved themselves of blame. The fact that they could be held responsible in the first place is the idiocy.
The consequences of that idiocy are, it seems, already tragic.